The welfare of layer hens in cage and cage-free housing systems

Historically, animal welfare has been defined by the absence of negative states such as disease, hunger and thirst. However, a shift in animal welfare science has led to the understanding that good animal welfare cannot be achieved without the experience of positive states. Unequivocally, the housing environment has significant impacts on animal welfare. This review summarises how cage and cage-free housing systems impact some of the key welfare issues for layer hens: musculoskeletal health, disease, severe feather pecking, and behavioural expression. Welfare in cage-free systems is currently highly variable, and needs to be addressed by management practices, genetic selection, further research, and appropriate design and maintenance of the housing environment. Conventional cages lack adequate space for movement, and do not include features to allow behavioural expression. Hens therefore experience extreme behavioural restriction, musculoskeletal weakness and an inability to experience positive affective states. Furnished cages retain the benefits of conventional cages in terms of production efficiency and hygiene, and offer some benefits of cage-free systems in terms of an increased behavioural repertoire, but do not allow full behavioural expression. In Australia, while the retail market share of free-range eggs has been increasing in recent years, the majority of hens (approximately 70%) remain housed in conventional cages, and furnished cages are not in use. Unlike many other countries including New Zealand, Canada, and all those within the European Union (where a legislated phase-out commenced in 1999 and was completed in 2012) a legislative phase-out of conventional cages has not been announced in Australia. This review came about in light of the current development of the Australian Animal Welfare Standards and Guidelines for Poultry in Australia. These standards are intended to provide nationally consistent legislation for the welfare of all poultry species in all Australian states and territories. While it is purported that the standards will reflect contemporary scientific knowledge, there is no scientific review, nor scientific committee to inform the development of these standards, and conventional cages are permitted in the standards with no phase-out proposed.

[1]  I. Duncan,et al.  The performance of nest building by domestic hens: is it more important than the construction of a nest? , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  D. Fraser.  Assessing Animal Welfare at the Farm and Group Level: The Interplay of Science and Values , 2003, Animal Welfare.

[3]  L. Green,et al.  Assessment of the behaviour and welfare of laying hens on free-range units , 2007, Veterinary Record.

[4]  T. Foster,et al.  The demand for straw and feathers as litter substrates by laying hens , 2000 .

[5]  L. Keeling,et al.  Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. , 1999, British poultry science.

[6]  O. Distl,et al.  Effect of furnished small group housing systems and furnished cages on mortality and causes of death in two layer strains , 2005, British poultry science.

[7]  A. Janczak,et al.  Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens , 2015, Poultry science.

[8]  S. Brown,et al.  Continuous monitoring of pop hole usage by commercially housed free-range hens throughout the production cycle , 2011, Veterinary Record.

[9]  P. Hemsworth,et al.  Laying hen welfare I. Social environment and space , 2016 .

[10]  I. Duncan,et al.  Frustrated nesting behaviour: Relation to extra-cuticular shell calcium and bone strength in White Leghorn hens , 2003, British poultry science.

[11]  E. Zeltner,et al.  Effect of artificial structuring on the use of laying hen runs in a free-range system , 2003, British poultry science.

[12]  G. Cronin,et al.  The importance of pre-laying behaviour and nest boxes for laying hen welfare: a review , 2012 .

[13]  B. Huber-Eicher,et al.  Reducing feather pecking when raising laying hen chicks in aviary systems. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[14]  J. Cooper,et al.  Behavioural priorities of laying hens , 2003 .

[15]  P. Hester,et al.  Early access to perches in caged White Leghorn pullets. , 2012, Poultry science.

[16]  I. Duncan.  The pros and cons of cages , 2001 .

[17]  L. Wilkins,et al.  Differential effects of increased stocking density, mediated by increased flock size, on feather pecking and aggression in laying hens , 1999 .

[18]  A. P. Van de Wouw,et al.  Fly the coop! Vertical structures influence the distribution and behaviour of laying hens in an outdoor range. , 2013, Australian veterinary journal.

[19]  D. Mellor,et al.  Concepts of animal well-being and predicting the impact of procedures on experimental animals , 1994 .

[20]  M. Špinka,et al.  General Principles for the welfare of animals in production systems: the underlying science and its application. , 2013, Veterinary journal.

[21]  M. Gentle,et al.  Beak trimming of poultry: its implications for welfare , 1995 .

[22]  Christopher M. Wathes,et al.  Light, Vision and the Welfare of Poultry , 2003, Animal Welfare.

[23]  P. Hester,et al.  The effect of perch access during pullet rearing and egg laying on physiological measures of stress in White Leghorns at 71 weeks of age. , 2014, Poultry science.

[24]  C Chauve,et al.  The poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778): current situation and future prospects for control. , 1998, Veterinary parasitology.

[25]  D J Mellor,et al.  Development of animal welfare understanding drives change in minimum welfare standards. , 2014, Revue scientifique et technique.

[26]  C. Nicol,et al.  The prevention and control of feather pecking: application to commercial systems , 2013 .

[27]  David J. Mellor,et al.  Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “A Life Worth Living” , 2016, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[28]  C. Savory.  Feather pecking and cannibalism , 1995 .

[29]  J. Kjaer,et al.  Development of feather pecking in relation to light intensity , 1999 .

[30]  K. Uetake,et al.  Comparison of behavior, physical condition and performance of laying hens in four molting methods , 2008 .

[31]  W. Bessei,et al.  The interrelationships of nutrition and feather pecking in the the domestic fowl - A review , 2012 .

[32]  A. Birch,et al.  Part C notification (reference C/NL/13/01) from Suntory Holdings Limited for the import, distribution and retailing of carnation SHD-27531-4 cut flowers with modified petal colour for ornamental use. , 2015 .

[33]  D. Broom.  Indicators of poor welfare. , 1986, The British veterinary journal.

[34]  Michael N Romanov,et al.  Analysis of genetic relationships between various populations of domestic and jungle fowl using microsatellite markers. , 2001, Poultry science.

[35]  J. Downing,et al.  Determination of corticosterone concentrations in egg albumen: A non-invasive indicator of stress in laying hens , 2008, Physiology & Behavior.

[36]  M. Bracke,et al.  Assessing the Importance of Natural Behavior for Animal Welfare , 2006 .

[37]  J. Mckinstry,et al.  Reducing The Prevalence And Severity Of Injurious Pecking n Laying Hens Without Beak Trimming , 2010 .

[38]  L. Green,et al.  Matched concurrent case-control study of risk factors for feather pecking in hens on free-range commercial farms in the UK , 2003, British poultry science.

[39]  I. Vågsholm,et al.  Causes of mortality in laying hens in different housing systems in 2001 to 2004 , 2009, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

[40]  N. O’Connell,et al.  The influence of access to aerial perches on fearfulness, social behaviour and production parameters in free-range laying hens , 2012 .

[41]  G. Cronin,et al.  Scientific assessment of animal welfare , 2015, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[42]  R. Marchant-Forde,et al.  Comparative effects of infrared and one-third hot-blade trimming on beak topography, behavior, and growth. , 2008, Poultry science.

[43]  G. Cronin,et al.  Severe feather-pecking in non-cage laying hens and some associated and predisposing factors: a review , 2016 .

[44]  C. Savory,et al.  Use of perches and nestboxes by laying hens in relation to social status, based on examination of consistency of ranking orders and frequency of interaction. , 2001, Applied animal behaviour science.

[45]  H. McCormack,et al.  Relationships between genetic, environmental and nutritional factors influencing osteoporosis in laying hens , 2006, British poultry science.

[46]  T. Achterbosch,et al.  Animal welfare in poultry production systems: impact of EU standards on world trade , 2008 .

[47]  F. Tuyttens,et al.  Risk factors associated with keel bone and foot pad disorders in laying hens housed in aviary systems. , 2016, Poultry science.

[48]  B. Sonck,et al.  Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: assimilating expert opinion , 2008, Animal Welfare.

[49]  J. Murrell,et al.  The effect of keel fractures on egg production, feed and water consumption in individual laying hens , 2013, British poultry science.

[50]  M. Dawkins.  Priorities in the cage size and flooring preferences of domestic hens , 1981 .

[51]  R C Newberry,et al.  Hen welfare in different housing systems. , 2011, Poultry science.

[52]  B. Sonck,et al.  Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: an on-farm comparison , 2008, Animal Welfare.

[53]  C. Nicol.  Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  G. Cronin,et al.  The effects of environmental enrichment and beak-trimming during the rearing period on subsequent feather damage due to feather-pecking in laying hens. , 2015, Poultry science.

[55]  T. Knowles,et al.  The risk factors affecting the development of gentle and severe feather pecking in loose housed laying hens , 2010 .

[56]  P. Hester,et al.  Effect of perches on liver health of hens. , 2014, Poultry science.

[57]  A. Gilbert,et al.  Some hormones involved in the nesting behaviour of hens. , 1973, Animal behaviour.

[58]  R. Tauson.  Management and housing systems for layers – effects on welfare and production , 2005 .

[59]  G. Wang,et al.  Wet litter and perches as risk factors for the development of foot pad dermatitis in floor-housed hens. , 1998, British poultry science.

[60]  P. E. Taylor,et al.  The ability of domestic hens to jump between horizontal perches: effects of light intensity and perch colour , 2003 .

[61]  McAdie,et al.  Effect of manipulating feathers of laying hens on the incidence of feather pecking and cannibalism. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[62]  I. Estevez,et al.  Use of space in the domestic fowl: separating the effects of enclosure size, group size and density , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[63]  Michael C. Appleby,et al.  Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: environmental, physical and behavioural aspects , 1991 .

[64]  F. Tuyttens,et al.  Effects of perch design on behaviour and health of laying hens , 2009, Animal Welfare.

[65]  F. Tuyttens,et al.  Opinion of Belgian Egg Farmers on Hen Welfare and Its Relationship with Housing Type , 2015, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[66]  P. Koene,et al.  Thwarting of behaviour in different contexts and the gakel-call in the laying hen. , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[67]  Christine J Nicol,et al.  A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of vent pecking in laying hens in alternative systems and its associations with feather pecking, management and disease , 2001 .

[68]  B. Sonck,et al.  Welfare, Health, and Hygiene of Laying Hens Housed in Furnished Cages and in Alternative Housing Systems , 2005, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[69]  I. Duncan,et al.  The notion of ethological ‘need’, models of motivation and animal welfare , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[70]  N. Prescott,et al.  Preference and motivation of laying hens to eat under different illuminances and the effect of illuminance on eating behaviour , 2002, British poultry science.

[71]  P. Hester.  The effect of perches installed in cages on laying hens , 2014 .

[72]  N. Lambe,et al.  Ability of laying hens to negotiate horizontal perches at different heights, separated by different angles. , 1997, British poultry science.

[73]  R. C. Newberry,et al.  Production-related traits of layers reared in different sized flocks: the concept of problematic intermediate group sizes. , 2003, Poultry science.

[74]  P. Koene,et al.  Influence of farm factors on the occurrence of feather pecking in organic reared hens and their predictability for feather pecking in the laying period , 2009 .

[75]  T. Rodenburg,et al.  The effects of selection on low mortality and brooding by a mother hen on open-field response, feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens , 2009, Animal Welfare.

[76]  K. Uetake,et al.  Multi-factorial investigation of various housing systems for laying hens , 2010, British poultry science.

[77]  C. Nicol,et al.  Behavioural needs, priorities and preferences of laying hens , 2006 .

[78]  Michael C. Appleby,et al.  The Value of Environmental Resources to Domestic Hens: A Comparison of the Work-Rate for Food and for Nests as a Function of Time , 2003, Animal Welfare.

[79]  L. Schrader,et al.  Pressure load on keel bone and foot pads in perching laying hens in relation to perch design. , 2011, Poultry science.

[80]  W. Bessei,et al.  The preference for high-fiber feed in laying hens divergently selected on feather pecking. , 2012, Poultry science.

[81]  Hannah M. Buchanan-Smith,et al.  Control and Complexity in Novel Object Enrichment , 1997, Animal Welfare.

[82]  U. Knierim.  Animal welfare aspects of outdoor runs for laying hens: a review , 2006 .

[83]  L. Keeling,et al.  Why in earth? Dustbathing behaviour in jungle and domestic fowl reviewed from a Tinbergian and animal welfare perspective , 2005 .

[84]  Duncan,et al.  Working for a dustbath: are hens increasing pleasure rather than reducing suffering? , 2000, Applied animal behaviour science.

[85]  D. Broom.  The scientific assessment of animal welfare , 1988 .

[86]  H. Bak,et al.  Reduced use of antimicrobials after vaccination of pigs against porcine proliferative enteropathy in a Danish SPF herd , 2009, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

[87]  A. Webster.  Welfare implications of avian osteoporosis. , 2004, Poultry science.

[88]  H. Blokhuis,et al.  The Relevance of Sleep in Poultry , 1983 .

[89]  M. V. van Krimpen,et al.  The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles , 2013 .

[90]  H. A. Elson,et al.  Development of furnished cages for laying hens , 2002, British poultry science.

[91]  E. Ringler,et al.  Cannibalism , 2019, Current Biology.

[92]  J. B. Kjaer,et al.  Dustbathing in food particles does not remove feather lipids. , 2014, Poultry science.

[93]  S. Gebhardt-Henrich,et al.  Prevalence of keel bone deformities in Swiss laying hens , 2011, British poultry science.

[94]  G. Banks.  Battery Eggs Sale and Production in the Act Research Report , 1998 .

[95]  R. Hoop,et al.  Diseases in chicks and laying hens during the first 12 years after battery cages were banned in Switzerland , 2009, Veterinary Record.

[96]  H. Blokhuis.  Rest in poultry , 1984 .