Losing the trait without losing the signal: Evolutionary shifts in communicative colour signalling

Colour signalling traits are often lost over evolutionary time, perhaps because they increase vulnerability to visual predators or lose relevance in terms of sexual selection. Here, we used spectrometric and phylogenetic comparative analyses to ask whether four independent losses of a sexually selected blue patch are spectrally similar, and whether these losses equate to a decrease in conspicuousness or to loss of a signal. We found that patches were lost in two distinct ways: either increasing reflectance primarily at very long or at very short wavelengths, and that species with additional colour elements (UV, green and pink) may be evolutionary intermediates. In addition, we found that patch spectral profiles of all species were closely aligned with visual receptors in the receiver's retina. We found that loss of the blue patch makes males less conspicuous in terms of chromatic conspicuousness, but more conspicuous in terms of achromatic contrast, and that sexual dimorphism often persists regardless of patch loss. Dorsal surfaces were considerably more cryptic than were ventral surfaces, and species in which male bellies were the most similar in conspicuousness to their dorsal surfaces were also the most sexually dimorphic. These results emphasize the consistent importance of sexual selection and its flexible impact on different signal components through evolutionary time.

[1]  E. Martins,et al.  Information‐gathering as a response to manipulated signals in the eastern fence lizard, Sceloporus undulatus , 2018, Ethology.

[2]  E. Martins,et al.  In Space and Time: Territorial Animals are Attracted to Conspecific Chemical Cues. , 2017, Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[3]  M. Novotny,et al.  Evolutionary Interactions Between Visual and Chemical Signals: Chemosignals Compensate for the Loss of a Visual Signal in Male Sceloporus Lizards , 2016, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[4]  J. Endler,et al.  Color Change for Thermoregulation versus Camouflage in Free-Ranging Lizards , 2016, The American Naturalist.

[5]  E. Martins,et al.  Shaping communicative colour signals over evolutionary time , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[6]  A. Barron,et al.  A systems approach to animal communication , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  J. Losos,et al.  A Naturalist’s Insight into the Evolution of Signal Redundancy , 2015, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Clayton E Cressler,et al.  Detecting Adaptive Evolution in Phylogenetic Comparative Analysis Using the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Model. , 2015, Systematic biology.

[9]  Richard K. Simpson,et al.  Migration and the evolution of sexual dichromatism: evolutionary loss of female coloration with migration among wood-warblers , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  E. Martins,et al.  Evolving from static to dynamic signals: evolutionary compensation between two communicative signals , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  R. Tinghitella,et al.  The evolutionary loss of a badge of status alters male competition in three-spine stickleback , 2015 .

[12]  W. Halliday,et al.  Testosterone, body size, and sexual signals predict parasite load in Yarrow's Spiny Lizards (Sceloporus jarrovii) , 2014 .

[13]  E. Font,et al.  Ultraviolet vision in lacertid lizards: evidence from retinal structure, eye transmittance, SWS1 visual pigment genes and behaviour , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  J. Stamps,et al.  Convergent evolution in the territorial communication of a classic adaptive radiation: Caribbean Anolis lizards , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  J. Wiens,et al.  DIVERSITY AND NICHE EVOLUTION ALONG ARIDITY GRADIENTS IN NORTH AMERICAN LIZARDS (PHRYNOSOMATIDAE) , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  E. Martins,et al.  Information content is more important than sensory system or physical distance in guiding the long-term evolutionary relationships between signaling modalities in Sceloporus lizards , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  P. Fitze,et al.  Independent sources of condition dependency and multiple pathways determine a composite trait: lessons from carotenoid‐based plumage colouration , 2013, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[18]  Esteban Fernández-Juricic,et al.  Oblique color vision in an open-habitat bird: spectral sensitivity, photoreceptor distribution and behavioral implications , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  T. Jombart,et al.  How to measure and test phylogenetic signal , 2012 .

[20]  Liam J. Revell,et al.  phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things) , 2012 .

[21]  M. Whiting,et al.  High sensitivity to short wavelengths in a lizard and implications for understanding the evolution of visual systems in lizards , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Erina Hara,et al.  Field presentation of male secretions alters social display in Sceloporus virgatus but not S. undulatus lizards , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  T. Langkilde,et al.  Color as a Signal: The Relationship between Coloration and Morphology in Male Eastern Fence Lizards, Sceloporus undulatus , 2010 .

[24]  P. Fitze,et al.  Dissecting Carotenoid from Structural Components of Carotenoid‐Based Coloration: A Field Experiment with Great Tits (Parus major) , 2010, The American Naturalist.

[25]  Liam J. Revell,et al.  Size-Correction and Principal Components for Interspecific Comparative Studies , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  T. Laaksonen,et al.  Distinguishing between male and territory quality: females choose multiple traits in the pied flycatcher , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  D. Kemp,et al.  Conspicuousness of Dickerson's collared lizard (Crotaphytus dickersonae) through the eyes of conspecifics and predators , 2009 .

[28]  M. Vorobyev,et al.  A review of the evolution of animal colour vision and visual communication signals , 2008, Vision Research.

[29]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  A Comparative Method for Studying Adaptation to a Randomly Evolving Environment , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  M. Cummings SENSORY TRADE-OFFS PREDICT SIGNAL DIVERGENCE IN SURFPERCH , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  D. Levey,et al.  The role of chromatic and achromatic signals for fruit detection by birds , 2006 .

[32]  P. Nicoletto,et al.  The role of sexual selection in the loss of sexually selected traits in the swordtail fish Xiphophorus continens , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  Sarah R Partan,et al.  Issues in the Classification of Multimodal Communication Signals , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[34]  T. Ord,et al.  Combining motions into complex displays: playbacks with a robotic lizard , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  M. Leal,et al.  Differences in Visual Signal Design and Detectability between Allopatric Populations of Anolis Lizards , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[36]  U. Candolin The use of multiple cues in mate choice , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[37]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  E. Huhta,et al.  Individual color variation and male quality in pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca): a role of ultraviolet reflectance , 2002 .

[39]  R. Foster,et al.  Visual pigments and oil droplets in diurnal lizards: a comparative study of Caribbean anoles. , 2002, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[40]  M. Leal,et al.  Evidence for habitat partitioning based on adaptation to environmental light in a pair of sympatric lizard species , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  G. Hill,et al.  SPECIES DIVERGENCE IN SEXUALLY SELECTED TRAITS: INCREASE IN SONG ELABORATION IS RELATED TO DECREASE IN PLUMAGE ORNAMENTATION IN FINCHES , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  José Martín,et al.  Pheromonal Recognition of Females Takes Precedence over the Chromatic Cue in Male Iberian Wall Lizards Podarcis hispanica , 2001 .

[43]  Michael F. Benard,et al.  Negative association between conspicuous visual display and chemosensory behavior in two phrynosomatid lizards , 2001 .

[44]  J. Wiens Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: how the peacock lost its spots , 2001 .

[45]  D. K. Hews,et al.  Signals and behavioural responses are not coupled in males: aggression affected by replacement of an evolutionarily lost colour signal , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  J. Wiens Phylogenetic evidence for multiple losses of a sexually selected character in phrynosomatid lizards , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[47]  P. Marler,et al.  Communication Goes Multimodal , 1999, Science.

[48]  J A Endler,et al.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[49]  K. Burns A PHYLOGENETIC PERSPECTIVE ON THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DICHROMATISM IN TANAGERS (THRAUPIDAE): THE ROLE OF FEMALE VERSUS MALE PLUMAGE , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[50]  M. Vorobyev,et al.  Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  T. F. Hansen STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADAPTATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[52]  K. E. Omland Female mallard mating preferences for multiple male ornaments , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[53]  H. Emden,et al.  Hopkins' ‘host selection principle’, another nail in its coffin , 1996 .

[54]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Multiple Displays in Animal Communication:`Backup Signals' and `Multiple Messages' , 1996 .

[55]  G. Sætre,et al.  Female pied flycatchers prefer brightly coloured males , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[56]  E. Martins A Comparative Study of the Evolution of Sceloporus Push-Up Displays , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[57]  A. Møller,et al.  Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[58]  E. P. Martins Contextual use of the push-up display by the sagebrush lizard, Sceloporus graciosus , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[59]  J. Endler Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[60]  T. Reimchen LOSS OF NUPTIAL COLOR IN THREESPINE STICKLEBACKS (GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS) , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[61]  W. Cooper,et al.  Social significance of ventrolateral coloration in the fence lizard, Sceloporus undulatus , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  A. Lundberg,et al.  Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics , 1986, Nature.

[63]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[64]  J. Endler Natural and sexual selection on color patterns in poeciliid fishes , 1983, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[65]  A. S. Rand,et al.  An Estimation of Redundancy and Information Content of Anole Dewlaps , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[66]  W D Wright,et al.  Color Science, Concepts and Methods. Quantitative Data and Formulas , 1967 .

[67]  R. Fisher The Evolution of Dominance in Certain Polymorphic Species , 1930, The American Naturalist.

[68]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[69]  E. Font,et al.  Ultraviolet reflectance of male nuptial colouration in sand lizards (Lacerta agilis) from the Pyrenees , 2007 .

[70]  K. E. Omland Female mallard mating preferences for multiple male ornaments , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[71]  C. Hawryshyn,et al.  Nuptial Colour Loss and Signal Masking in Gasterosteus: an Analysis Using Video Imaging , 1995 .

[72]  J. Endler A Predator’s View of Animal Color Patterns , 1978 .