Foamy oil flow in heavy oil–solvent systems tested by pressure depletion in a sandpack

Abstract In this study, pressure depletion tests on foamy oil flow were conducted in a one-meter-long sandpack system to investigate the effect of pressure depletion rates on different heavy oil–solvent systems in porous media. Pure methane, pure propane, and a mixture of methane and propane were recombined respectively into a typical Manatokan dead heavy oil sample to generate live oil samples, four different pressure depletion rates were undertaken for each heavy oil–solvent system. The experimental results showed that, a critical pressure depletion rate, at which the maximum oil recovery factor (RF) could be obtained, was observed for each heavy oil–solvent system. The critical pressure depletion rates were 1.70 kPa/min, 0.76 kPa/min, and 3.97 kPa/min with the oil RF of 22.13%, 24.17%, and 21.80%, for heavy oil–methane, heavy oil–propane, and heavy oil–mixture systems, respectively. The foamy oil for heavy oil–methane system is more stable than heavy oil–propane system due to (1) that for heavy oil–methane system, significant amount of oil were produced after the pressure in the back pressure regulator (BPR) dropped to atmosphere pressure and (2) that for heavy oil–propane system, the pressure plots show many pressure fluctuations due to the high solubility of propane and non-stability of gas bubbles in the foamy oil. For heavy oil–mixture system, the foamy oil flow behavior is more complex than heavy oil–pure solvent systems and it is suggested that the performance of foamy oil flow of heavy oil–mixture system is poorer than heavy oil–methane and heavy oil–propane systems, which might be caused by non-homogenous bubbles generated by the mixture of methane and propane. The results obtained in this study could be used to guide cyclic solvent injection (CSI) design in field.

[1]  A. Turta,et al.  Mobility of Gas-in-Oil Dispersions in Enhanced Solution Gas Drive (Foamy Oil) Exploitation of Heavy Oil Reservoirs , 2003 .

[2]  Shangqi Liu,et al.  Behaviors of Foamy Oil Flow in Solution Gas Drive at Different Temperatures , 2015, Transport in Porous Media.

[3]  R. Kumar,et al.  Effect of Viscosity and Diffusion Coefficient on the Kinetics of Bubble Growth in Solution-Gas Drive in Heavy Oil , 2001 .

[4]  Yongan Gu,et al.  Gasflooding-assisted cyclic solvent injection (GA-CSI) for enhancing heavy oil recovery , 2014 .

[5]  B. Maini,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Foamy Oil Depletion Tests , 2005 .

[6]  S. McDougall,et al.  Pore-scale modelling of the effect of viscous pressure gradients during heavy oil depletion experiments , 2009 .

[7]  Yiping Zhang.  Effects of temperature on foamy solution gas-drive , 1999 .

[8]  Mingzhe Dong,et al.  Enhanced heavy oil recovery in thin reservoirs using foamy oil-assisted methane huff-n-puff method , 2015 .

[9]  Hemanta Kumar Sarma,et al.  Significance of Foamy-oil Behaviour In Primary Production of Heavy Oils , 1993 .

[10]  R. Wong,et al.  Heavy Oil Flow Under Solution-gas Drive: Pressure Depletion Tests , 1999 .

[11]  Zhangxin Chen,et al.  A pseudo-bubble point model and its simulation for foamy oil in porous media , 2015 .

[12]  Zhangxin Chen,et al.  Performance of Drainage Experiments With Orinoco Belt Heavy Oil in a Long Laboratory Core in Simulated Reservoir Conditions , 2008 .

[13]  Jeannine Chang,et al.  Field-Scale Simulation of Cyclic Solvent Injection (CSI) , 2013 .

[14]  Understanding HW-CSS for Thin Heavy Oil Reservoir , 2013 .

[15]  Xiaofei Sun,et al.  Diffusion coefficients of natural gas in foamy oil systems under high pressures , 2015, Petroleum Science.

[16]  Brij B. Maini,et al.  Foamy-Oil Flow , 2001 .

[17]  Mehran Pooladi-Darvish,et al.  Solution-Gas Drive in Heavy Oil: Field Prediction and Sensitivity Studies Using Low Gas Relative Permeability , 2000 .

[18]  Gerald E. Smith,et al.  Fluid flow and sand production in heavy-oil reservoirs under solution-gas drive , 1988 .

[19]  W. S. Tortike,et al.  Experimental Study of Foamy Oil Stability , 1997 .

[20]  Bashir Busahmin,et al.  Effect of Solution-Gas-Oil-Ratio on Performance of Solution Gas Drive in Foamy Heavy Oil Systems , 2010 .

[21]  Pengcheng Liu,et al.  Experimental study on the stability of the foamy oil in developing heavy oil reservoirs , 2013 .

[22]  M. Pooladi-Darvish,et al.  The Effect of Pressure-Decline Rate and Pressure Gradient on the Behavior of Solution-Gas Drive in Heavy Oil , 2009 .

[23]  A. Chakma,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Foamy Oil Flow Using a High Pressure Etched Glass Micromodel , 2003 .

[24]  Songyan Li,et al.  Experimental study on the performance of foamy oil flow under different solution gas–oil ratios , 2015 .

[25]  Brij B. Maini,et al.  An integrated experimental study of foamy oil flow during solution gas drive , 2003 .

[26]  R. Bora,et al.  Cold production of heavy oil: an experimental investigation of foamy oil flow in porous media , 1998 .

[27]  B. Maini.  Laboratory Evaluation of Solution Gas Drive Recovery Factors In Foamy Heavy Oil Reservoirs , 1999 .

[28]  Yongan Gu,et al.  A new solvent-based enhanced heavy oil recovery method: Cyclic production with continuous solvent injection , 2014 .

[29]  Abbas Firoozabadi,et al.  Mechanisms of Solution Gas Drive in Heavy Oil Reservoirs , 2001 .

[30]  R. E. Hayes,et al.  Modelling Foamy Oil Flow in Porous Media , 1999 .

[31]  B. Busahmin,et al.  Foamy Oil Flow and its Role in Heavy Oil Production , 2010 .

[32]  J. Sheng.  Enhanced Oil Recovery Field Case Studies , 2013 .

[33]  Christine W. Chan,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Post-CHOPS Cyclic Solvent Injection Process , 2015 .