Comparing classification methods for diffuse reflectance spectra to improve tissue specific laser surgery

BackgroundIn the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, newly developed laser scalpels have multiple advantages over traditional metal scalpels. However, they lack haptic feedback. This is dangerous near e.g. nerve tissue, which has to be preserved during surgery. One solution to this problem is to train an algorithm that analyzes the reflected light spectra during surgery and can classify these spectra into different tissue types, in order to ultimately send a warning or temporarily switch off the laser when critical tissue is about to be ablated. Various machine learning algorithms are available for this task, but a detailed analysis is needed to assess the most appropriate algorithm.MethodsIn this study, a small data set is used to simulate many larger data sets according to a multivariate Gaussian distribution. Various machine learning algorithms are then trained and evaluated on these data sets. The algorithms’ performance is subsequently evaluated and compared by averaged confusion matrices and ultimately by boxplots of misclassification rates. The results are validated on the smaller, experimental data set.ResultsMost classifiers have a median misclassification rate below 0.25 in the simulated data. The most notable performance was observed for the Penalized Discriminant Analysis, with a misclassifiaction rate of 0.00 in the simulated data, and an average misclassification rate of 0.02 in a 10-fold cross validation on the original data.ConclusionThe results suggest a Penalized Discriminant Analysis is the most promising approach, most probably because it considers the functional, correlated nature of the reflectance spectra.The results of this study improve the accuracy of real-time tissue discrimination and are an essential step towards improving the safety of oral laser surgery.

[1]  Forest Baskett,et al.  An Algorithm for Finding Nearest Neighbors , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[2]  Emeka Nkenke,et al.  LIMITATIONS OF CANCER MARGIN DELINEATION BY MEANS OF AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING UNDER CONDITIONS OF LASER SURGERY , 2010 .

[3]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Penalized Discriminant Analysis , 1995 .

[4]  Hans-Georg Müller,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 2016 .

[5]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  Reshaping Data with the reshape Package , 2007 .

[6]  Emeka Nkenke,et al.  Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for optical soft tissue differentiation as remote feedback control for tissue‐specific laser surgery , 2010, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[7]  Nirmala Ramanujam,et al.  Autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance properties of malignant and benign breast tissues , 2004, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  Ruiliang Pu,et al.  Penalized discriminant analysis of in situ hyperspectral data for conifer species recognition , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[10]  R. Dasari,et al.  Ultrasensitive Chemical Analysis by Raman Spectroscopy , 1999 .

[11]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[12]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[13]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[14]  R. Dasari,et al.  Ultrasensitive chemical analysis by Raman spectroscopy. , 1999, Chemical reviews.

[15]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[16]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[17]  M Luomanen,et al.  A comparative study of healing of laser and scalpel incision wounds in rat oral mucosa. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[18]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[19]  Emeka Nkenke,et al.  The impact of laser ablation on optical soft tissue differentiation for tissue specific laser surgery-an experimental ex vivo study , 2012, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[20]  Emeka Nkenke,et al.  In Vivo Optical Tissue Differentiation by Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy , 2012, Surgical innovation.

[21]  S. Qin,et al.  Selection of the Number of Principal Components: The Variance of the Reconstruction Error Criterion with a Comparison to Other Methods† , 1999 .

[22]  J. Franklin,et al.  The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction , 2005 .

[23]  J. Roodenburg,et al.  Autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for oral oncology , 2005, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[24]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[25]  Emeka Nkenke,et al.  Optical Nerve Detection by Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy for Feedback Controlled Oral and Maxillofacial Laser Surgery , 2011, Journal of Translational Medicine.

[26]  E. Nkenke,et al.  Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for optical nerve identification: Preliminary ex vivo results for feedback controlled oral and maxillofacial laser surgery , 2010 .

[27]  B. Efron Estimating the Error Rate of a Prediction Rule: Improvement on Cross-Validation , 1983 .

[28]  J. Friedman Regularized Discriminant Analysis , 1989 .

[29]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.