Please silence your cell phone: Your ringtone captures other people's attention.

Ringtones are designed to draw attention away from on-going activities. In the present study, it was investigated whether the disruptive effects of a ringing cell phone on short-term memory are inevitable or become smaller as a function of exposure and whether (self-) relevance plays a role. Participants performed a serial recall task either in silence or while task-irrelevant ringtones were presented. Performance was worse when a ringing phone had to be ignored, but gradually recovered compared with the quiet control condition with repeated presentation of the distractor sound. Whether the participant's own ringtone was played or that of a yoked-control partner did not affect performance and habituation rate. The results offer insight into auditory distraction by highly attention-demanding distractors and recovery therefrom. Implications for work environments and other applied settings are discussed.

[1]  A. Buchner,et al.  Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[2]  E. Elliott,et al.  The Distracting Effects of a Ringing Cell Phone: An Investigation of the Laboratory and the Classroom Setting. , 2009, Journal of environmental psychology.

[3]  Carol Holland,et al.  Influence of personal mobile phone ringing and usual intention to answer on driver error. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  E. Schröger,et al.  Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event‐related potential study with ringtones , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[5]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[6]  Bill Macken,et al.  Role of Habituation in the Irrelevant Sound Effect : Evidence From the Effects of Token Set Size and Rate of Transition , 2001 .

[7]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Habituation and dishabituation to speech and office noise , 1997 .

[8]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction , 2009, Cognition.

[10]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Auditory Distraction in Semantic Memory: A Process-Based Approach. , 2008 .

[11]  Yôiti Suzuki,et al.  Equal-loudness-level contours for pure tones. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Habituation of the irrelevant sound effect: evidence for an attentional theory of short-term memory disruption. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  W. Ellermeier,et al.  Individual differences in susceptibility to the "irrelevant speech effect". , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Patrik Sörqvist,et al.  Working memory capacity modulates habituation rate: Evidence from a cross-modal auditory distraction paradigm , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Patrik Sörqvist,et al.  Expectations Modulate the Magnitude of Attentional Capture by Auditory Events , 2012, PloS one.

[16]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption , 2002, Memory.

[17]  A. Buchner,et al.  Self-relevance increases the irrelevant sound effect: Attentional disruption by one's own name , 2013 .

[18]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition Broken Expectations : Violation of Expectancies , Not Novelty , Captures Auditory Attention , 2011 .

[19]  S P Banbury,et al.  Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements , 2005, Ergonomics.

[20]  C. Philip Beaman,et al.  Auditory distraction from low‐intensity noise: a review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments , 2005 .

[21]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Listen out! Behavioural and subjective responses to verbal warnings , 2012 .

[24]  Axel Buchner,et al.  Irrelevant speech disrupts item-context binding. , 2013, Experimental psychology.

[25]  A. Buchner,et al.  The role of habituation and attentional orienting in the disruption of short-term memory performance , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Is My Mobile Ringing? Evidence for Rapid Processing of a Personally Significant Sound in Humans , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  A. Buchner,et al.  Equivalent irrelevant-sound effects for old and young adults , 2007, Memory & cognition.