The Long Road to Automation: Neurocognitive Development of Letter–Speech Sound Processing

In transparent alphabetic languages, the expected standard for complete acquisition of letter–speech sound associations is within one year of reading instruction. The neural mechanisms underlying the acquisition of letter–speech sound associations have, however, hardly been investigated. The present article describes an ERP study with beginner and advanced readers in which the influence of letters on speech sound processing is investigated by comparing the MMN to speech sounds presented in isolation with the MMN to speech sounds accompanied by letters. Furthermore, SOA between letter and speech sound presentation was manipulated in order to investigate the development of the temporal window of integration for letter–speech sound processing. Beginner readers, despite one year of reading instruction, showed no early letter–speech sound integration, that is, no influence of the letter on the evocation of the MMN to the speech sound. Only later in the difference wave, at 650 msec, was an influence of the letter on speech sound processing revealed. Advanced readers, with 4 years of reading instruction, showed early and automatic letter–speech sound processing as revealed by an enhancement of the MMN amplitude, however, at a different temporal window of integration in comparison with experienced adult readers. The present results indicate a transition from mere association in beginner readers to more automatic, but still not “adult-like,” integration in advanced readers. In contrast to general assumptions, the present study provides evidence for an extended development of letter–speech sound integration.

[1]  H. Semlitsch,et al.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[2]  R. Goebel,et al.  Integration of Letters and Speech Sounds in the Human Brain , 2004, Neuron.

[3]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Interaction of speech and script in human auditory cortex: Insights from neuro-imaging and effective connectivity , 2009, Hearing Research.

[4]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? , 2004, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[5]  L. Siegel,et al.  Acquisition of certain grapheme-phoneme correspondences in normally achieving and disabled readers , 1989 .

[6]  Christina M. Krause,et al.  Early and Late Mismatch Negativity Elicited by Words and Speech-Like Stimuli in Children , 2001, Brain and Language.

[7]  Marja Laasonen,et al.  Crossmodal Temporal Order and Processing Acuity in Developmentally Dyslexic Young Adults , 2002, Brain and Language.

[8]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Mismatch negativity (MMN): perspectives for application. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[9]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The effect of temporal asynchrony on the multisensory integration of letters and speech sounds. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  D. Brandeis,et al.  Development of the automatic mismatch response: from frontal positivity in kindergarten children to the mismatch negativity , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  R. Näätänen.  The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled & automatic processing: behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Dries J. W. Froyen,et al.  Cross-modal enhancement of the MMN to speech-sounds indicates early and automatic integration of letters and speech-sounds , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  T. Picton,et al.  Mismatch Negativity: Different Water in the Same River , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[15]  Penny A. MacDonald,et al.  The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Dries J. W. Froyen,et al.  Evidence for a specific cross-modal association deficit in dyslexia: an electrophysiological study of letter-speech sound processing. , 2011, Developmental science.

[17]  J. Raven.  Coloured progressive matrices : sets A, Ab, B , 1956 .

[18]  E. Schröger.  Measurement and interpretation of the mismatch negativity , 1998 .

[19]  G. Comi,et al.  IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  Bertram Müller-Myhsok,et al.  Association of a Rare Variant with Mismatch Negativity in a Region Between KIAA0319 and DCDC2 in Dyslexia , 2011, Behavior genetics.

[21]  Elaine Fox.  Grapheme-phoneme correspondence in dyslexic and matched control readers. , 1994, British journal of psychology.

[22]  R. Goebel,et al.  Deviant processing of letters and speech sounds as proximate cause of reading failure: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of dyslexic children. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  Daniel Brandeis,et al.  Evidence for developmental changes in the visual word processing network beyond adolescence , 2006, NeuroImage.

[24]  Riitta Hari,et al.  Audiovisual Integration of Letters in the Human Brain , 2000, Neuron.

[25]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Development of Sight Word Reading: Phases and Findings. , 2008 .

[26]  Holger Mitterer,et al.  Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: Evidence for early compensation , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Temporal window of integration of auditory information in the human brain. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[28]  T. Picton,et al.  Cortical oscillations related to processing congruent and incongruent grapheme–phoneme pairs , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Imaging the developing brain: what have we learned about cognitive development? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Sound perception affected by nonlinear variation of accuracy in memory trace , 2004, Neuroreport.

[31]  Mara L. Morr,et al.  Maturation of Mismatch Negativity in School‐Age Children , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[32]  Marja Laasonen,et al.  Rate of Information Segregation in Developmentally Dyslexic Children , 2000, Brain and Language.

[33]  A. Iwanami,et al.  No effect of gender on tonal and phonetic mismatch negativity in normal adults assessed by a high-resolution EEG recording. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[34]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Attention and mismatch negativity. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[36]  L. Blomert,et al.  Is there a causal link from a phonological awareness deficit to reading failure in children at familial risk for dyslexia? , 2010, Dyslexia.

[37]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[38]  R. Stennett,et al.  Developmental patterns in elemental reading skills: phoneme-grapheme and grapheme-phoneme correspondences. , 1972, Journal of educational psychology.

[39]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[40]  Suzanne E. Welcome,et al.  Mapping cortical change across the human life span , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Bonte,et al.  Deviant neurophysiological responses to phonological regularities in speech in dyslexic children , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  U. Frauenfelder,et al.  Grapheme Context Effects on Phonemic Processing , 1989 .

[43]  Michael J Brammer,et al.  Crossmodal identification , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  M. Cheour,et al.  Mismatch Negativity and Late Discriminative Negativity in Investigating Speech Perception and Learning in Children and Infants , 2001, Audiology and Neurotology.

[45]  M. Snowling,et al.  The development of grapheme-phoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers. , 1980, Journal of experimental child psychology.