How Contradictions Facilitate Evolutionary Transformation: an Exploration into the dynamics of Business-IT Alignment from the Perspective of Activity Theory

This paper aims at contributing to our understanding of business-IT alignment and at offering a novel and theoretically well-grounded view on the phenomenon. Drawing on Activity Theory (AT), we argue that business and IT reflect two distinct, yet related activity systems. We propose that applying AT enables systematic analysis of these systems, their constituents and complex interrelations. Building on AT’s notion of tensions, we further assume that AT enables us to iden-tify and manage misalignment within and between the systems as well as drivers for their mutual development. Subsequently, AT provides a coherent framework for describing and analysing complex interrelations between both domains. To illustrate the applicability of AT and highlight its potentials to contribute to our understand-ing of business-IT alignment, we conducted a single, in-depth case study. As to that, we analyse six years of co-evolution of business and IT within a complex organizational setting. Our empir-ical examinations show that continually approaching emerging tensions within and between the two activity systems and implementing changes enables co-evolutionary processes of both sys-tems. Though further research has to approve the practical applicability of the framework, we provide early evidence that activity system analysis can enable practitioners to purposefully detect and approach misalignments.

[1]  Steven De Haes,et al.  An Exploratory Study into IT Governance Implementations and its Impact on Business/IT Alignment , 2009, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[2]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Enhancing the measurement of information technology (IT) business alignment and its influence on company performance , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[3]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[4]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  Achieving social alignment between business and IT – an empirical evaluation of the efficacy of IT governance mechanisms , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Jerry N. Luftman,et al.  Key information technology and management issues 2010–11: an international study , 2011, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  B. van den Hooff,et al.  Us and them: a social capital perspective on the relationship between the business and IT departments , 2011 .

[7]  Tricia L Erstad,et al.  Analyzing computer based patient records: a review of literature. , 2003, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[8]  Grover S. Kearns,et al.  The effect of strategic alignment on the use of IS-based resources for competitive advantage , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Evolving Work Routines: Adaptive Routinization of Information Technology in Healthcare , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  ICT for development in the context of the closure of Chernobyl nuclear power plant: an activity theory perspective , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Jacky Swan,et al.  Understanding the Role of Objects in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Eric van Heck,et al.  No time to waste: the role of timing and complementarity of alignment practices in creating business value in IT projects , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Grover S. Kearns,et al.  A Resource-Based View of Strategic IT Alignment: How Knowledge Sharing Creates Competitive Advantage , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[14]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Six types of IT-business strategic alignment: an investigation of the constructs and their measurement , 2015, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  Working with activity theory: Context, technology, and information behavior , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Frank Blackler,et al.  Organizing Processes in Complex Activity Networks , 2000 .

[17]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  CIO Reporting Structure, Strategic Positioning, and Firm Performance , 2011, MIS Q..

[18]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  CEO/CIO mutual understanding, strategic alignment, and the contribution of IS to the organization , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Qing Hu,et al.  The impact of IT-business strategic alignment on firm performance in a developing country setting: exploring moderating roles of environmental uncertainty and strategic orientation , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[20]  M. Cole A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition , 1993 .

[21]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization , 2001 .

[22]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research , 2014 .

[23]  A. N. Leont’ev,et al.  Activity, consciousness, and personality , 1978 .

[24]  Bill Doolin,et al.  Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[25]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Antecedents of IS Strategic Alignment: A Nomological Network , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  How Information Technology Governance Mechanisms and Strategic Alignment Influence Organizational Performance: Insights from a Matched Survey of Business and IT Managers , 2015, MIS Q..

[28]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. , 2005, Health affairs.

[29]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[30]  F. Blackler KNOWLEDGE AND THE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONS: ORGANIZATIONS AS ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AND THE REFRAMING OF MANAGEMENT* , 1993 .

[31]  Hind Benbya,et al.  Using coevolutionary and complexity theories to improve IS alignment: a multi-level approach , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[32]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Conceptualizing the Dynamic Strategic Alignment Competency , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  Aligning in practice: from current cases to a new agenda , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[34]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[35]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[36]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  When the river leaves its bed: analyzing deviations between planned and actual interaction structures in IT change processes , 2013, J. Inf. Technol..

[37]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[38]  Tim Weitzel,et al.  How to Achieve Operational Business-IT Alignment: Insights from a Global Aerospace Firm , 2012, MIS Q. Executive.

[39]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[40]  Gerald Grant Reconceptualizing the concept of business and IT alignment: from engineering to agriculture , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Yolande E. Chan Why Haven't We Mastered Alignment? The Importance of the Informal Organization Structure , 2002, MIS Q. Executive.

[42]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  Mobile technology in mobile work: contradictions and congruencies in activity systems , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[43]  W. Stead Rethinking electronic health records to better achieve quality and safety goals. , 2007, Annual review of medicine.

[44]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[45]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Principles and Models for Organizing the IT Function , 2002, MIS Q. Executive.

[46]  Paula Jarzabkowski,et al.  Strategic Practices: An Activity Theory Perspective on Continuity and Change , 2003 .

[47]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[49]  K. Kuutti Perspectives on activity theory: Activity theory, transformation of work, and information systems design , 1999 .

[50]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Y Engeström,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Objects , contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition : an activity-theoretical perspective , 2003 .

[52]  V. Kaptelinin The Object of Activity: Making Sense of the Sense-Maker , 2005 .

[53]  K. Kuutti Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[54]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  How Social Capital Among Information Technology and Business Units Drives Operational Alignment and IT Business Value , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Strategic IT alignment: twenty-five years on , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[56]  Stan Karanasios,et al.  HOW SHOULD TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE BE EXPLAINED ? A COMPARISON OF THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF CRITICAL REALISM AND ACTIVITY THEORY 1 , 2013 .

[57]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  Key Issues of IT Organizations and Their Leadership: The 2013 SIM IT Trends Study , 2013, MIS Q. Executive.

[58]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Activity Theory and the Social Construction of Knowledge: A Story of Four Umpires , 2000 .

[60]  Kai Zheng,et al.  Understanding technology adoption in clinical care: Clinician adoption behavior of a point-of-care reminder system , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.