Steady-state assessment of the DG impact on voltage control and loss allocation

The introduction of distributed generation (DG) affects the operational characteristics of the distribution systems. The impact depends on the level of penetration of DG, as well as on the possibility of operating significant portions of the distribution system as micro-grids, or to allow temporary operation of intentional islands. In the electrical sector, the major changes occurred in the last two decades led to modify the structure of the electricity business from a vertically integrated utility (VIU) system, in which the four major functions of the electrical chain (that is, generation, transmission, distribution and retail) were operated by the same company, to an unbundled system in which these functions are separated and are performed by different companies. One of the main effects of unbundling has been the decoupling of the function of generator with respect to the one of the distribution network operator (DNO). A plurality of local generators connected to the today’s distribution systems are owned and managed independently of the DNO. The objectives themselves at the local generation site management may differ from the ones of the DNO. More specifically: at the local generation site, the main goals are to provide energy to the local users, to sell excess electricity to the grid when the electricity price makes it convenient, and to reduce the internal losses; the DNO’s main objectives are to run the distribution system in a reliable, safe and secure way, without exceeding the operational limits on voltages and currents, maintaining reduced losses and satisfactorily high power quality levels; emerging options include the role of energy service companies or organised consortia in managing local generators located at different points in the networks in an integrated way, mainly for economic purposes, or the comprehensive management of portions of the networks with generators and loads as micro-grids.

[1]  Ronnie Belmans,et al.  Distributed generation: definition, benefits and issues , 2005 .

[2]  M. R. Irving,et al.  Transmission loss allocation through a modified Ybus , 2005 .

[3]  Enrico Carpaneto,et al.  Characterization of the loss allocation techniques for radial systems with distributed generation , 2008 .

[4]  F. Blaabjerg,et al.  Z-Source-Inverter-Based Flexible Distributed Generation System Solution for Grid Power Quality Improvement , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[5]  Jae-Chul Kim,et al.  Network reconfiguration at the power distribution system with dispersed generations for loss reduction , 2000, 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37077).

[6]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Z-Bus Loss Allocation , 2001 .

[7]  M.E. Baran,et al.  A Multiagent-Based Dispatching Scheme for Distributed Generators for Voltage Support on Distribution Feeders , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Frede Blaabjerg,et al.  Overview of Control and Grid Synchronization for Distributed Power Generation Systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[9]  I. Roytelman,et al.  Coordinated local and centralized control in distribution management systems , 2000 .

[10]  G.P. Harrison,et al.  Centralized and Distributed Voltage Control: Impact on Distributed Generation Penetration , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Sung-Hun Ko,et al.  Application of voltage- and current-controlled voltage source inverters for distributed generation systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[12]  D. Rajicic,et al.  Energy summation method for energy loss computation in radial distribution networks , 1996 .

[13]  Enrico Carpaneto,et al.  Application of the circuit-based loss allocation techniques to radial distribution systems , 2006 .

[14]  L.A.F. Ferreira,et al.  Distributed Reactive Power Generation Control for Voltage Rise Mitigation in Distribution Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Janusz Bialek,et al.  Proportional sharing assumption in tracing methodology , 2004 .

[16]  W. L. Fang,et al.  Succinct method for allocation of network losses , 2002 .

[17]  Enrico Carpaneto,et al.  Voltage Controllability of Distribution Systems with Local Generation Sources , 2004 .

[18]  N. Hadjsaid,et al.  Dispersed generation impact on distribution networks , 1999 .

[19]  J. A. Pecas Lopes,et al.  Coordinated voltage support in distribution networks with distributed generation and microgrids , 2009 .

[20]  D. Karlsson,et al.  Combined Local and Remote Voltage and Reactive Power Control in the Presence of Induction Machine Distributed Generation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Danny Pudjianto,et al.  Virtual power plant and system integration of distributed energy resources , 2007 .

[22]  H. Nikkhajoei,et al.  Distributed Generation Interface to the CERTS Microgrid , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[23]  T. Funabashi,et al.  Optimal Distribution Voltage Control and Coordination With Distributed Generation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[24]  J. Mutale,et al.  Allocation of losses in distribution systems with embedded generation , 2000 .

[25]  M. Matos,et al.  Loss allocation in distribution networks with embedded generation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[26]  Mario Russo,et al.  Optimal exploitation of generator-transformer units , 1998 .

[27]  Vladimir C. Strezoski,et al.  Voltage control integrated in distribution management system , 2001 .

[28]  A.M. Knight,et al.  A review of power converter topologies for wind generators , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Electric Machines and Drives, 2005..

[29]  G. Chicco,et al.  Branch current decomposition method for loss allocation in radial distribution systems with distributed generation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[30]  A. Sannino,et al.  Voltage control with inverter-based distributed generation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.