Hearing aid processing changes tone burst onset: effect on cortical auditory evoked potentials in individuals with normal audiometric thresholds.

PURPOSE The validity of using the cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) as an objective measure of hearing aid outcome has been questioned in the literature due to stimulus modifications caused by hearing aid processing. This study aimed to investigate the effects of hearing aid processing on the CAEP elicited with tone bursts that may have altered onsets. METHOD CAEPs to unprocessed and hearing aid-processed tone bursts were obtained from 16 individuals with normal audiometric thresholds when the onset time, level, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were matched between the 2 conditions. Tone bursts processed by the hearing aid were recorded in an anechoic box and were presented through insert receivers. Unprocessed tone bursts were superimposed with hearing aid noise floor to match the SNR of the hearing aid-processed tone bursts. RESULTS Shortening of rise time and overshoot at the onset of the tone burst were evident in the hearing aid-processed stimuli. Statistical analysis of data showed no significant effects of hearing aid processing on the latency or amplitude of CAEP peaks (p > .05). CONCLUSION The changes in rise time occurring in the tone bursts due to hearing aid processing may not confound CAEP measures that are used to validate hearing aid fitting.

[1]  Martin Dahlquist,et al.  Standard Audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 Measurement Procedure , 2010, Trends in amplification.

[2]  Elmer V Carlson,et al.  Noise in miniature microphones. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  P. Skinner,et al.  Effects of signal duration and rise time on the auditory evoked potential. , 1968, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Synchrony of Neural Activity in Electric Responses Evoked by Transient Acoustic Stimuli , 1958 .

[5]  S. Purdy,et al.  Duration-sensitive neurons in the auditory cortex , 2009, Neuroreport.

[6]  D P Phillips,et al.  Spike-rate intensity functions of cat cortical neurons studied with combined tone-noise stimuli. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  FRANCIS K. KUK.  5 Considerations in Modern Multichannel Nonlinear Hearing Aids , 2002 .

[8]  J. Suzuki,et al.  Effects of rise time on simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked potentials from the early, middle and late ranges. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[9]  R. Burkard.  Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 2010 .

[10]  Paavo Alku,et al.  Subtitled videos and mismatch negativity (MMN) investigations of spoken word processing. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[11]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Brainstem responses to speech syllables , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  Erika Skoe,et al.  Perception of Speech in Noise: Neural Correlates , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  J Agnew.  Audible circuit noise in hearing aid amplifiers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  D. P. Phillips.  Neural representation of sound amplitude in the auditory cortex: effects of noise masking , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[15]  W. Olsen,et al.  Average Speech Levels and Spectra in Various Speaking/Listening Conditions: A Summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell (1977) Report. , 1998, American journal of audiology.

[16]  Liat Kishon-Rabin,et al.  Identification of syllables in noise: electrophysiological and behavioral correlates. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  K. Hecox,et al.  Effect of broadband noise on the human brain stem auditory evoked response. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[18]  M. Hyde,et al.  The N1 response and its applications. , 1997, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[19]  R. Burkard,et al.  The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. I. Rate and intensity effects. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  B. Moore.  Cochlear hearing loss : physiological, psychological and technical issues , 2014 .

[21]  Sheila Moodie,et al.  The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm , 2005, Trends in amplification.

[22]  L E Lamb,et al.  Influence of signal variables on evoked response to sound. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  Torsten Baldeweg,et al.  The ERP signature of sound rise time changes , 2009, Brain Research.

[24]  J. Eggermont,et al.  Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application , 2006 .

[25]  J. Kates.  Principles of Digital Dynamic-Range Compression , 2005, Trends in amplification.

[26]  D. Prasher.  The influence of stimulus spectral content on rise time effects in cortical-evoked responses. , 1980, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[27]  H. Davis,et al.  Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Deborah Hayes,et al.  Handbook of Clinical Audiology (4th ed.) , 1994 .

[29]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and functional measures in young infants. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[30]  D. Markle,et al.  Hearing Aids , 1936, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[31]  Ruth A Bentler,et al.  Measurement of hearing aid internal noise. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  G. Christopher Stecker,et al.  Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level , 2009, Hearing Research.

[33]  Curtis J. Billings,et al.  Effects of Hearing Aid Amplification and Stimulus Intensity on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[34]  R. Cox,et al.  Development of APHAB Norms for WDRC Hearing Aids and Comparisons with Original Norms , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[35]  B. Lavoie,et al.  The choice of distracting task can affect the quality of auditory evoked potentials recorded for clinical assessment , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[36]  James M. Kates,et al.  Digital hearing aids. , 2008, Harvard health letter.

[37]  Curtis J. Billings,et al.  Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes in hearing aid gain , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[38]  D. Klass,et al.  Cortical audiometry. Potential pitfalls in testing. , 1968, Archives of otolaryngology.

[39]  D. P. Phillips.  Temporal response features of cat auditory cortex neurons contributing to sensitivity to tones delivered in the presence of continuous noise , 1985, Hearing Research.

[40]  M. Florentine,et al.  Temporal integration in normal hearing, cochlear impairment, and impairment simulated by masking. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  Curtis J. Billings,et al.  Neural Representation of Amplified Speech Sounds , 2006, Ear and hearing.