e-Business strategy and firm performance: a latent class assessment of the drivers and impediments to success

Among many leading organizations, in all sectors of industry, commerce and government, there is considerable evidence of e-business being deployed to achieve strategic goals. Where this deployment has been most successful, there is a strong case that the organization has taken an integrated approach that both builds on the organization's strengths and pays careful attention to the process of change within the organization. However, in the literature most empirical work has either studied e-business strategy and performance from the perspective of strategy content – which highlights positioning and/or unique bundles of resources – or from the perspective of strategy process – which captures human influence and e-business implementation. In this study, we integrate these two perspectives to develop a more holistic understanding of the underlying drivers of e-business performance. Further, latent class modeling techniques are used to show that the variables in our study are heavily influenced by the unobservable heterogeneity across firms. Four distinct types of firms populate our data, and the relationship between performance and its underlying determinants varies greatly between them. The implication is that a single model cannot explain the relationship between environment, structure, feasibility, managerial beliefs and performance. This is critical to our understanding of e-business as it implies that there is far less homogeneity at the individual firm level than is normally assumed in the literature.

[1]  Linda Duxbury The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation , 1993 .

[2]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[3]  Kressel,et al.  Competing for the Future , 2007 .

[4]  Timothy M. Devinney,et al.  Understanding Institutional Designs within Marketing Value Systems , 1999 .

[5]  J. Barney,et al.  IS THE RESOURCE-BASED " VIEW " A USEFUL PERSPECTIVE FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH ? , 2001 .

[6]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  A mixture likelihood approach for generalized linear models , 1995 .

[7]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[8]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[9]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Strategic Information Technology Investments: Guidelines for Decision Making , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[11]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Yolande E. Chan IT Value: The Great Divide Between Qualitative and Quantitative and Individual and Organizational Measures , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing , 2002 .

[14]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta - Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm - Level Empirical Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Finite-Mixture Structural Equation Models for Response-Based Segmentation and Unobserved Heterogeneity , 1997 .

[16]  Paul F. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Latent Structure Analysis. , 1969 .

[17]  D. Schendel,et al.  A Strategic Model of the U.S. Brewing Industry: 1952-1971 , 1978 .

[18]  H. Akaike A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[19]  Gerald E. Fryxell,et al.  The Fortune Corporate 'Reputation' Index: Reputation for What? , 1994 .

[20]  Claudio Aspesi,et al.  Brilliant strategy, but can you execute? , 1999 .

[21]  Egon Berghout,et al.  Information Technology: Strategic Decision Making for Managers , 2006 .

[22]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Shaping UP for E-Commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimliation of Web Technologies , 2002, MIS Q..

[23]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[24]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[25]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[26]  T. Devinney,et al.  The Optimal Performance of the Global Firm: Formalizing and Extending the Integration- Responsiveness Framework , 2000 .

[27]  Ping Wang,et al.  Knowing why and how to innovate with packaged business software , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[28]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[29]  C. S. Boucher The Measurement Business , 1934 .

[30]  F. Krauss Latent Structure Analysis , 1980 .

[31]  Nandini Rajagopalan,et al.  TOWARDS A THEORY OF STRATEGIC CHANGE: A MULTI-LENS PERSPECTIVE AND INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK. , 1996 .

[32]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[33]  A. Pettigrew The Character and Significance of Strategy Process Research , 1992 .

[34]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Crafting and Executing Strategy , 2006 .

[35]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[36]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[37]  Nandini Rajagopalan,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF STRATEGIC CHANGE: A MULTI-LENS PERSPECTIVE AND INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK , 1997 .

[38]  David F. Midgley,et al.  Strategy content and process in the context of e-business performance , 2005 .

[39]  Rhonda K. Reger,et al.  A Review of Strategic Process Research , 1987 .

[40]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Limits to value in electronic commerce-related IT investments , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[41]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[42]  J. E. Butler,et al.  Tautology in the resource-based view and the implications of externally determined resource value: f , 2001 .

[43]  John P. Robinson,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – Criteria for Scale Selection and Evaluation , 1991 .

[44]  E. P. Michael Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[45]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[46]  J. Child Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[47]  N. Venkatraman Beyond Outsourcing: Managing IT Resources as a Value Center , 1997 .

[48]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technolgoy Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers , 2003, MIS Q..

[49]  H. Russell Johnston,et al.  Developing Capabilities to Use Information Strategically , 1988, MIS Q..

[50]  Dave Oliver,et al.  Justifying enterprise resource planning adoption , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[51]  Kenneth A. Kozar,et al.  A Multimedia Solution to Productivity Gridlock: A Re-Engineered Jewelry Appraisal System at Zale Corporation , 1994, MIS Q..

[52]  Robert A. Atkinson,et al.  Reshaping IS Strategic Planning , 1990 .

[53]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[54]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[55]  J. Louviere,et al.  The impact of brand credibility on consumer price sensitivity , 2002 .

[56]  R. Sohi,et al.  IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? , 2003 .

[57]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  CSCW challenges: cooperative design in engineering projects , 1993, CACM.

[58]  Vera Ivanaj,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and Sustainable Development: A Review of Strategy Process Research , 2009 .

[59]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[60]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[61]  P. Varadarajan Strategy content and process perspectives revisited , 1999 .

[62]  Gomes Pj Is success a sin? A conversation with the reverend Peter J. Gomes. Interview by David A. Light. , 2001 .

[63]  L. Donaldson Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations , 1997 .

[64]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[65]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[66]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation , 1997 .

[67]  Werner Reinartz,et al.  Getting the most out of all your customers. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[68]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .