BrainNet: A Multi-Person Brain-to-Brain Interface for Direct Collaboration Between Brains

We present BrainNet which, to our knowledge, is the first multi-person non-invasive direct brain-to-brain interface for collaborative problem solving. The interface combines electroencephalography (EEG) to record brain signals and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to deliver information noninvasively to the brain. The interface allows three human subjects to collaborate and solve a task using direct brain-to-brain communication. Two of the three subjects are designated as “Senders” whose brain signals are decoded using real-time EEG data analysis. The decoding process extracts each Sender’s decision about whether to rotate a block in a Tetris-like game before it is dropped to fill a line. The Senders’ decisions are transmitted via the Internet to the brain of a third subject, the “Receiver,” who cannot see the game screen. The Senders’ decisions are delivered to the Receiver’s brain via magnetic stimulation of the occipital cortex. The Receiver integrates the information received from the two Senders and uses an EEG interface to make a decision about either turning the block or keeping it in the same orientation. A second round of the game provides an additional chance for the Senders to evaluate the Receiver’s decision and send feedback to the Receiver’s brain, and for the Receiver to rectify a possible incorrect decision made in the first round. We evaluated the performance of BrainNet in terms of (1) Group-level performance during the game, (2) True/False positive rates of subjects’ decisions, and (3) Mutual information between subjects. Five groups, each with three human subjects, successfully used BrainNet to perform the collaborative task, with an average accuracy of 81.25%. Furthermore, by varying the information reliability of the Senders by artificially injecting noise into one Sender’s signal, we investigated how the Receiver learns to integrate noisy signals in order to make a correct decision. We found that like conventional social networks, BrainNet allows Receivers to learn to trust the Sender who is more reliable, in this case, based solely on the information transmitted directly to their brains. Our results point the way to future brain-to-brain interfaces that enable cooperative problem solving by humans using a “social network” of connected brains.

[1]  C. Baird,et al.  The pilot study. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[2]  Dan Yang,et al.  In Vitro and In Vivo Activity of a Novel Antifungal Small Molecule against Candida Infections , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  Conscious Brain-to-Brain Communication in Humans Using Non-Invasive Technologies , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[4]  Byoung-Kyong Min,et al.  Neuroimaging-based approaches in the brain-computer interface. , 2010, Trends in biotechnology.

[5]  R. Sorrentino,et al.  Electronic Filter Simulation & Design , 2007 .

[6]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Visual spatial attention tracking using high-density SSVEP data for independent brain-computer communication , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The role of social networks in information diffusion , 2012, WWW.

[8]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Navigating a 2D Virtual World Using Direct Brain Stimulation , 2016, Front. Robot. AI.

[9]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  A Direct Brain-to-Brain Interface in Humans , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[11]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[12]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Correcting for the sampling bias problem in spike train information measures. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Norman M. Dott An Introductory Review , 1962 .

[14]  Miguel A L Nicolelis,et al.  Corrigendum: Building an organic computing device with multiple interconnected brains , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Soraj Hongladarom,et al.  Brain-brain integration in 2035: metaphysical and ethical implications , 2015, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[16]  A. Piquero,et al.  USING THE CORRECT STATISTICAL TEST FOR THE EQUALITY OF REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS , 1998 .

[17]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Towards an independent brain–computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Solaiman Shokur,et al.  A Brain-Machine Interface Enables Bimanual Arm Movements in Monkeys , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[19]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Synchronous Bursts on Scale-Free Neuronal Networks with Attractive and Repulsive Coupling , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  M. M. Taylor,et al.  PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions , 1967 .

[21]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory: Cover/Elements of Information Theory, Second Edition , 2005 .

[22]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  H. B. Meziane,et al.  Movement Preparation and Bilateral Modulation of Beta Activity in Aging and Parkinson’s Disease , 2015, PloS one.

[24]  P. Nunez,et al.  Electric fields of the brain , 1981 .

[25]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Building an organic computing device with multiple interconnected brains , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Mikhail A. Lebedev,et al.  Computing Arm Movements with a Monkey Brainet , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[27]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[28]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Playing 20 Questions with the Mind: Collaborative Problem Solving by Humans Using a Brain-to-Brain Interface , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, Current Biology.

[30]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  When Two Brains Connect , 2014 .

[31]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  A Collaborative Brain-Computer Interface for Improving Human Performance , 2011, PloS one.

[32]  E. Harth,et al.  Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of Eeg , 2005 .

[33]  J. Kenney Mathematics of statistics , 1940 .

[34]  Mark Dingemanse,et al.  Brain-to-brain interfaces and the role of language in distributing agency , 2017 .

[35]  Marios Kyriazis,et al.  Systems neuroscience in focus: from the human brain to the global brain? , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[36]  P. Rao Statistical Research Methods in the Life Sciences , 1997 .

[37]  Mukesh Dhamala,et al.  Hyperscanning : Simultaneous fMRI during Linked Social Interactions , 2001 .

[38]  René J. Huster,et al.  Methods for Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: An Introductory Review , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  J. Kenney,et al.  Mathematics of statistics , 1940 .