Explicit methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study

Attribute weighting is a key aspect when modeling multi-attribute decision analysis problems. Despite the large number of proposals reported in the literature, reaching a consensus on the most convenient method for a certain scenario is difficult, if not impossible. As a first contribution of this paper, we propose a categorization of existing methodologies, which goes beyond the current taxonomy (subjective, objective, hybrid). As a second contribution, supported by the new categorization, we survey and critically discuss the explicit weighting methods (which are closely related to the subjective ones). The critical discussion allows evaluating how much a solution can deviate from the expected one if no foresight is taken. As a final contribution, we summarize the main drawbacks from a global perspective and propose some insights to correct them. Such a discussion attempts to improve the reliability of decision support systems involving human experts.

[1]  Tommi Tervonen,et al.  Entropy-optimal weight constraint elicitation with additive multi-attribute utility models , 2016 .

[2]  Tai-Myung Chung,et al.  Optimizing Access Point Allocation Using Genetic Algorithmic Approach for Smart Home Environments , 2009, Comput. J..

[3]  Ira Horowitz,et al.  The linear programming alternative to policy capturing for eliciting criteria weights in the performance appraisal process , 1995 .

[4]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[7]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  A general multiple attribute decision-making approach for integrating subjective preferences and objective information , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[8]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Distance and Aggregation-Based Methodologies for Hesitant Fuzzy Decision Making , 2017, Cognitive Computation.

[9]  Mohammadsadegh Mobin,et al.  An Integrated AHP-GIS-MCLP Method to Locate Bank Branches , 2015 .

[10]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Group decision making under multiple criteria , 1987 .

[11]  Shu-Ping Wan,et al.  A new method for Atanassov's interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy MAGDM with incomplete attribute weight information , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[12]  F. H. Barron,et al.  SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 1994 .

[13]  Muhammad Sajjad Ali Khan,et al.  New extension of TOPSIS method based on Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy sets with incomplete weight information , 2018, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[14]  David J. Weiss,et al.  SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved Simple Methods for Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 2008 .

[15]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[16]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy QUALIFLEX method with a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[17]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Tiantian Bao,et al.  MADM method based on prospect theory and evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights under intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Michael N. Huhns,et al.  A consensus framework for multiple attribute group decision analysis in an evidential reasoning context , 2014, Inf. Fusion.

[20]  Manfeng Liu,et al.  The Maximizing Deviation Method Based on Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Weighted Aggregating Operator for Multiple Criteria Group Decision Analysis , 2015 .

[21]  Xiaolu Zhang,et al.  Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: A hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Mei Li,et al.  A Distance Model of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Cross Entropy to Solve Preference Problem on Alternatives , 2016 .

[24]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Weize Wang,et al.  The multi-attribute decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein hybrid weighted geometric operator , 2013, Comput. Math. Appl..

[26]  Huayou Chen,et al.  Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy continuous weighted entropy and its application to multi-criteria fuzzy group decision making , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[27]  J. Dombi,et al.  A method for determining the weights of criteria: the centralized weights , 1986 .

[28]  Charalambos L. Iacovou,et al.  Determining attribute weights using mathematical programming , 2003 .

[29]  Chao Fu,et al.  An interval difference based evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights and utilities of assessment grades , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[30]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  An evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirements , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Yingjun Zhang,et al.  Objective Attributes Weights Determining Based on Shannon Information Entropy in Hesitant Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2014 .

[32]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[33]  Dan Horsky,et al.  Estimation of Attribute Weights from Preference Comparisons , 1984 .

[34]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[35]  Quan Zhang,et al.  An approach to multiple attribute decision making based on preference information on alternatives , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[36]  R. Venkata Rao,et al.  Industrial robot selection using a novel decision making method considering objective and subjective preferences , 2011, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[37]  Jian Ma,et al.  A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  John R. Doyle,et al.  A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best , 2001 .

[39]  Md. Yusof B. Ismail,et al.  A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process , 2012 .

[40]  David J. Weiss,et al.  How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking , 2008 .

[41]  R. Green,et al.  Judging Relative Importance: Direct Rating and Point Allocation Are Not Equivalent , 1997, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[42]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[43]  Shu-Ping Wan,et al.  Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy mathematical programming method for hybrid multi-criteria group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy truth degrees , 2015, Inf. Fusion.

[44]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  On fuzzy multiattribute decision-making models and methods with incomplete preference information , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[45]  Muhammad Sajjad Ali Khan,et al.  Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to group decision making with incomplete weight information , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[46]  C. West Churchman,et al.  Introduction to operations research , 1957 .

[47]  Quan Zhang,et al.  Decision consolidation: criteria weight determination using multiple preference formats , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[48]  Jin-Han Park,et al.  Correlation coefficient of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute group decision making problems , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[49]  Sen Liu,et al.  Decision making for the selection of cloud vendor: An improved approach under group decision-making with integrated weights and objective/subjective attributes , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[50]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[51]  Deng-Feng Li,et al.  Closeness coefficient based nonlinear programming method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiattribute decision making with incomplete preference information , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[52]  Weixuan Xu,et al.  Estimating The Attribute Weights Through Evidential Reasoning And Mathematical Programming , 2004, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[53]  Changyong Liang,et al.  Generalized cross-entropy based group decision making with unknown expert and attribute weights under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[54]  Shu-Ping Wan,et al.  Atanassov's Intuitionistic Fuzzy Programming Method for Heterogeneous Multiattribute Group Decision Making With Atanassov's Intuitionistic Fuzzy Truth Degrees , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[55]  Ward Edwards,et al.  How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[56]  Carlos A. Bana e Costa,et al.  The MACBETH Approach: Basic Ideas, Software, and an Application , 1999 .

[57]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean fuzzy subsets , 2013, 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS).

[58]  Qiaoping Sun,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making Based on TOPSIS With Entropy-Weighted Method , 2015 .

[59]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  Objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures and computational experiment analysis , 2011, Appl. Soft Comput..

[60]  ZhangXiaolu Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis , 2016 .

[61]  F. Crispino,et al.  A Software Tool to Support the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and the User Need Elicitation of Medical Devices via the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) , 2014 .

[62]  Huayou Chen,et al.  Continuous interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to group decision making , 2014 .

[63]  Zhi Pei,et al.  Rational decision making models with incomplete weight information for production line assessment , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[64]  Yanfu Zhang TOPSIS Method Based on Entropy Weight for Supplier Evaluation of Power Grid Enterprise , 2015 .

[65]  Jun Ye Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Methods with Completely Unknown Weights in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Setting and Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Setting , 2013 .

[66]  Ying Luo,et al.  Integration of correlations with standard deviations for determining attribute weights in multiple attribute decision making , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..

[67]  Dengfeng Li,et al.  Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees , 2013 .

[68]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[69]  C. Hwang,et al.  TOPSIS for MODM , 1994 .

[70]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures: A comparative analysis , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[71]  Zhi-Ping Fan,et al.  A Subjective and Objective Integrated Approach to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Preference Information on Alternatives , 1999 .

[72]  Chong Wu,et al.  A Distance Model of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Cross Entropy to Solve Preference Problem on Alternatives , 2016 .

[73]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[74]  J. H. Park,et al.  Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision making problems under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2011 .

[75]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Ordered Weighted Hesitant Fuzzy Information Fusion-Based Approach to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Probabilistic Linguistic Term Sets , 2018, Fundam. Inform..

[76]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[77]  Shuyu Guo Application of entropy weight method in the evaluation of the road capacity of open area , 2017 .

[78]  G. Mavrotas,et al.  Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[79]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  An attribute weight based feedback model for multiple attributive group decision analysis problems with group consensus requirements in evidential reasoning context , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[80]  Chao Fu,et al.  A method of determining attribute weights in evidential reasoning approach based on incompatibility among attributes , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[81]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  The evidential reasoning approach for MADA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[82]  W. Edwards How to Use Multi-Attribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision Making , 1976 .

[83]  Gin-Shuh Liang,et al.  Fuzzy MCDM based on ideal and anti-ideal concepts , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..