An ecology of science education

This article reports on a 15 month study of attempted innovation in school science. The teachers in an Australian secondary school were attempting to introduce a constructivist approach to their teaching of science. The change attempt is interpreted through analogical transfer. In this method of analysis, the school science system is mapped against an ecosystem. That is, the science education system is conceptualized as an ecosystem; a self-sustaining, homeostatic, yet evolving, system of interacting influences. This ecological view of science education provides a way of interpreting the findings of this case study by using biological features of ecosystems, such as succession, evolution, selection and adaptation, to explain stagnation, degradation and change in school science. Implications of this interpretation of school science are considered including a proposed mechanism to promote innovation, such as a constructivist approach, through successive stages and the production and communication of knowledge.

[1]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Tom Nesbit,et al.  Cultures of Teaching , 2000 .

[3]  E. Mayr.  Toward a new philosophy of biology: observations of an evolutionist , 1988 .

[4]  Sam Glucksberg,et al.  Metaphor comprehension: How metaphors create new categories. , 1997 .

[5]  M. Fullan.  Change Forces: Probing the Depths of Educational Reform. School Development and the Management of Change Series: 10. , 1993 .

[6]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Cognition Unawares. (Book Reviews: Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious.) , 1996 .

[8]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought , 1994 .

[9]  H. Plotkin.  The nature of knowledge : concerning adaptations, instinct and the evolution of intelligence , 1994 .

[10]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[11]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[12]  D. Gentner,et al.  Chapter 4 – Reasoning1 , 1999 .

[13]  G. T. Miller.  Living in the environment : concepts, problems, and alternatives , 1975 .

[14]  B. Tuckman.  Conducting Educational Research , 1972 .

[15]  A. Stambuk.  Metaphor in the language of science , 1999 .

[16]  I. Goodson.  Subjects for Study: Aspects of a Social History of Curriculum. , 1983 .

[17]  Blanche Geer,et al.  School-Teacher: A Sociological Study. , 1976 .

[18]  V. Minichiello.  In-depth Interviewing: Researching People , 1992 .

[19]  Kevin Kelly,et al.  Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, and the Economic World , 1992 .

[20]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[21]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning in science : the implications of children's science , 1985 .

[22]  Michael Fullan,et al.  The New Meaning of Educational Change. Second Edition. , 1991 .

[23]  G. F. Tremblay,et al.  Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind, Gerald M. Edelman. 1992. Basic Books, New York, NY. 280 pages. ISBN: 0-465-05245-2. $25.00 , 1992 .

[24]  T. Flannery.  The Future Eaters , 1994 .

[25]  K. Dunbar.  How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. , 1997 .

[26]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[27]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler , 1997 .

[28]  D. Gentner,et al.  Commonalities and differences in similarity comparisons , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[29]  R. Atkinson.  Knowledge and Explanation in History , 1978 .