Diversity Analysis of MIMO Decode-and-Forward Relay Network by Using Near-ML Decoder

SUMMARY The probability of making mistakes on the decoded signals at the relay has been used for the maximum-likelihood (ML) decision at the receiver in the decode-and-forward (DF) relay network. It is well known that deriving the probability is relatively easy for the uncoded single-antenna transmission with M-pulse amplitude modulation (PAM). However, in the multiplexing multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) transmission, the multi-dimensional decision region is getting too complicated to derive the probability. In this paper, a high-performance near-ML decoder is devised by applying a well-known pairwise error probability (PEP) of two paired-signals at the relay in the MIMO DF relay network. It also proves that the near-ML decoder can achieve the maximum diversity of MS MD + MR min(MS , MD), where MS , MR ,a ndMD are the number of antennas at the source, relay, and destination, respectively. The simulation results show that 1) the near-ML decoder achieves the diversity we derived and 2) the bit error probability of the near-ML decoder is almost the same as that of the ML decoder.

[1]  Franz Hlawatsch,et al.  Efficient detection algorithms for MIMO channels: a geometrical approach to approximate ML detection , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[2]  Per Ola Börjesson,et al.  Simple Approximations of the Error Function Q(x) for Communications Applications , 1979, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[3]  Uday B. Desai,et al.  Performance Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Detection for Decode and Forward MIMO Relay Channels in Rayleigh Fading , 2009, 2009 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[4]  Siavash M. Alamouti,et al.  A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications , 1998, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[5]  M. Rodrigues,et al.  Characterisation of the Performance of Cooperative Networks in Ricean Fading Channels , 2005 .

[6]  Tung-Sang Ng,et al.  A novel analytical method for maximum likelihood detection in MIMO multiplexing systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[7]  Il-Min Kim,et al.  ML performance analysis of the decode-and-forward protocol in cooperative diversity networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  Elza Erkip,et al.  User cooperation diversity. Part I. System description , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[9]  Jong-Seon No,et al.  Distributed space-time coded non-orthogonal DF protocols with source antenna switching , 2010, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[10]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  M. J. Gans,et al.  On Limits of Wireless Communications in a Fading Environment when Using Multiple Antennas , 1998, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[12]  P. K. Chaturvedi,et al.  Communication Systems , 2002, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[13]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  High-Performance Cooperative Demodulation With Decode-and-Forward Relays , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[14]  Shu Lin,et al.  Error control coding : fundamentals and applications , 1983 .

[15]  Elza Erkip,et al.  User cooperation diversity. Part II. Implementation aspects and performance analysis , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[16]  Stephan ten Brink,et al.  Achieving near-capacity on a multiple-antenna channel , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[17]  강익선 Symbol error probability of orthogonal space-time block codes with QAM in slow rayleigh fading channel , 2003 .