Optimizing fixed observational assets in a coastal observatory

Abstract Proliferation of coastal observatories necessitates an objective approach to managing of observational assets. In this article, we used our experience in the coastal observatory for the Columbia River estuary and plume to identify and address common problems in managing of fixed observational assets, such as salinity, temperature, and water level sensors attached to pilings and moorings. Specifically, we addressed the following problems: assessing the quality of an existing array, adding stations to an existing array, removing stations from an existing array, validating an array design, and targeting of an array toward data assimilation or monitoring. Our analysis was based on a combination of methods from oceanographic and statistical literature, mainly on the statistical machinery of the best linear unbiased estimator. The key information required for our analysis was the covariance structure for a field of interest, which was computed from the output of assimilated and non-assimilated models of the Columbia River estuary and plume. The network optimization experiments in the Columbia River estuary and plume proved to be successful, largely withstanding the scrutiny of sensitivity and validation studies, and hence providing valuable insight into optimization and operation of the existing observational network. Our success in the Columbia River estuary and plume suggest that algorithms for optimal placement of sensors are reaching maturity and are likely to play a significant role in the design of emerging ocean observatories, such as the United State's ocean observation initiative (OOI) and integrated ocean observing system (IOOS) observatories, and smaller regional observatories.

[1]  J. She,et al.  Assessment of sea surface temperature observational networks in the Baltic Sea and North Sea , 2007 .

[2]  António M. Baptista,et al.  A cross-scale model for 3D baroclinic circulation in estuary–plume–shelf systems: II. Application to the Columbia River , 2005 .

[3]  Craig H. Bishop,et al.  Adaptive sampling with the ensemble transform Kalman filter , 2001 .

[4]  António M. Baptista,et al.  Salmon at River's End: The Role of the Estuary in the Decline and Recovery of Columbia River salmon , 2005 .

[5]  António M. Baptista,et al.  SELFE: A semi-implicit Eulerian–Lagrangian finite-element model for cross-scale ocean circulation , 2008 .

[6]  Petter Ögren,et al.  Cooperative control of mobile sensor networks:Adaptive gradient climbing in a distributed environment , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  C. Grimes,et al.  How do Riverine Plumes of Different Sizes Influence Fish Larvae: do they Enhance Recruitment? , 1996 .

[8]  Chris Snyder,et al.  Statistical Design for Adaptive Weather Observations , 1999 .

[9]  D. Menemenlis Inverse Modeling of the Ocean and Atmosphere , 2002 .

[10]  Drew Seils,et al.  Optimal design , 2007 .

[11]  N. Banas,et al.  A model study of tide- and wind-induced mixing in the Columbia River Estuary and plume , 2009 .

[12]  Barbara M. Hickey,et al.  A bi-directional river plume: The Columbia in summer , 2005 .

[13]  C. A. Barnes,et al.  THE CIRCULATION AND SELECTED PROPERTIES OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER EFFLUENT AT SEA. , 1970 .

[14]  James D. Watkins,et al.  AN OCEAN BLUEPRINT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: THE WORK OF THE U.S. COMMISSION ON OCEAN POLICY , 2004 .

[15]  Robert N. Miller,et al.  An optimized design for a moored instrument array in the tropical Atlantic Ocean , 1998 .

[16]  Edward P. Myers,et al.  A cross-scale model for 3D baroclinic circulation in estuary-plume-shelf systems: I , 2004 .

[17]  T. Mexia,et al.  Author ' s personal copy , 2009 .

[18]  Dacian N. Daescu,et al.  An adjoint sensitivity method for the adaptive location of the observations in air quality modeling , 2003 .

[19]  Roger Daley,et al.  Observation and background adjoint sensitivity in the adaptive observation‐targeting problem , 2007 .

[20]  L. Gandin Objective Analysis of Meteorological Fields , 1963 .

[21]  Zhe Jiang,et al.  Spatial Statistics , 2013 .

[22]  Peter R. Oke,et al.  Objective Array Design: Application to the Tropical Indian Ocean , 2008 .

[23]  David A. Jay,et al.  Interaction of fluctuating river flow with a barotropic tide: A demonstration of wavelet tidal analysis methods , 1997 .

[24]  James G. Bellingham,et al.  An efficient method of selecting ocean observing locations for capturing the leading modes and reconstructing the full field , 2008 .

[25]  Valery V. Fedorov,et al.  Optimal Experimental Design : Spatial Sampling , 1994 .

[26]  A. Bennett,et al.  Array design by inverse methods , 1985 .

[27]  L. Pietrafesa,et al.  The Columbia River plume study : Subtidal variability in the velocity and salinity fields , 1998 .

[28]  W. Godwin Article in Press , 2000 .

[29]  Anne Lohrli Chapman and Hall , 1985 .

[30]  A. Bennett Inverse Methods in Physical Oceanography , 1992 .

[31]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Optimal Design of Experiments , 1994 .

[32]  F. Bretherton,et al.  A technique for objective analysis and design of oceanographic experiments applied to MODE-73* , 2002 .

[33]  J. Gottsmann,et al.  AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco , 2006 .

[34]  David A. Jay,et al.  Circulation, density distribution and neap-spring transitions in the Columbia River Estuary , 1990 .

[35]  Melvin J. Dubnick Army Corps of Engineers , 1998 .

[36]  Rolf H. Langland,et al.  Adjoint-Based Targeting of Observations for Fastex Cyclones, , 1996 .

[37]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  Optimal Design of a Multi-Pollutant Air Quality Monitoring Network in a Metropolitan Region Using Kaohsiung, Taiwan as an Example , 1999 .

[38]  B. Hickey,et al.  Influence of wind stress and ambient flow on a high discharge river plume , 2002 .

[39]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Collective Motion, Sensor Networks, and Ocean Sampling , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[40]  W. J. Studden,et al.  Theory Of Optimal Experiments , 1972 .

[41]  A. Baptista,et al.  CORIE: the first decade of a coastal-margin collaborative observatory , 2006, OCEANS 2006.