Core/periphery Structures and Trust in Distributed Work Groups: A comparative case study

Trust is crucial for modern organizations and in particular in cases of virtual and distributed work. In such organizations much of the communication is based on electronic media, and the collaborators often know very little about each other when they start collaborating. Due to geographical boundaries it often takes a longer time to build trust in such organizations, and in difficult situations there is a risk of developing distrust rather than trust. This paper is concerned with how trust can be developed in highly distributed groups, and the network-related mechanisms that are used to build trust under such conditions. Based on a comparative study of vocational strong ties (intense, work-related) in four distributed groups, the study suggests that groups with higher levels of trust have an integrating core of collaborators that connects to central employees at the involved local sites. In contrast, the groups with lower trust had moved in the direction of establishing dual core structures with fewer boundary-crossing strong ties. Three central trust building mechanisms initiated by the integrating cores are discussed including; immediate coordination, visualization of work tasks and moderating conflicts.

[1]  Charles Tilly,et al.  Trust and rule , 2004 .

[2]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Time Effects in Computer-Mediated Groups: Past, Present, and Future , 2002 .

[3]  G. Homans The human group , 1952 .

[4]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[5]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[6]  F. Harary,et al.  The cohesiveness of blocks in social networks: Node connectivity and conditional density , 2001 .

[7]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Homogeneity in confiding relations , 1988 .

[9]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups , 2001 .

[10]  Jonathon N. Cummings Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[11]  R. Burt Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital , 2001 .

[12]  P. Killworth,et al.  Informant accuracy in social-network data V. An experimental attempt to predict actual communication from recall data☆ , 1982 .

[13]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[14]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[15]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Geographically-Colocated Subgroups in Globally Dispersed Teams: A Test of the Faultline Hypothesis , 2003 .

[16]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Network Structure in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[17]  Blake Ives,et al.  Trust and the Unintended Effects of Behavior Control in Virtual Teams , 2003, MIS Q..

[18]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation , 1988 .

[19]  B. Aubert,et al.  Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual Teams , 2003 .

[20]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[21]  Randall S. Schuler,et al.  Role Conflict and Role Ambiguity: Integration of the Literature and Directions for Future Research , 1981 .

[22]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[23]  N. Luhmann Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives , 2000 .

[24]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[25]  Roger V. Gould,et al.  A Dilemma of State Power: Brokerage and Influence in the National Health Policy Domain , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[27]  Tom Erik Julsrud,et al.  The development, distribution and maintenance of trust in distributed work groups: a social network approach , 2007, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[28]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  Demographic Diversity and Faultlines: The Compositional DYnamics of Organizational Groups , 1998 .

[29]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[30]  Guido Möllering,et al.  Trust: Reason, Routine, Reflexivity , 2006 .

[31]  F. Belanger,et al.  Communication patterns in distributed work groups: a network analysis , 1999 .

[32]  G. D. Weeks,et al.  Subjective time estimates of work tasks by office workers , 1977 .

[33]  J. Whitney Case Study Research , 1999 .

[34]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams , 2006 .

[35]  R. Friedman,et al.  Differentiation of Boundary Spanning Roles: Labor Negotiations and Implications for Role Conflict , 1992 .

[36]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[37]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[38]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Models of core/periphery structures , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[39]  N. Panteli Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 2005 .

[40]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[41]  R. Burt,et al.  Trust and third-party gossip. , 1996 .

[42]  D. R. White,et al.  Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups , 2003 .

[43]  B. Wellman Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. , 1988 .

[44]  Martin Kilduff,et al.  Structure, culture and Simmelian ties in entrepreneurial firms , 2002, Soc. Networks.

[45]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Trust in context: The development of interpersonal trust in geographically distributed work , 2004 .

[46]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Structures that work: social structure, work structure and coordination ease in geographically distributed teams , 2006, CSCW '06.

[47]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: People Working Across Boundaries with Technology, Second Edition , 2000 .

[48]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Organizational Identity and Identification: Charting New Waters and Building New Bridges , 2000 .

[49]  Pamela J. Bettis,et al.  Organizational Identity and Identification During a Departmental Reorganization , 2006 .

[50]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships , 1996 .

[51]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[52]  Laurence Prusak,et al.  In good company: how social capital makes organizations work , 2001, UBIQ.

[53]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: A longitudinal study , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[54]  J. Lewis,et al.  Trust as a Social Reality , 1985 .

[55]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[56]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[57]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 1989 .

[58]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Trust and temporary virtual teams: alternative explanations and dramaturgical relationships , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[59]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[60]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[61]  R. Burt Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2005 .

[62]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Scholarly Networks as Learning Communities: The Case of TechNet , 2002 .

[63]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[64]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[65]  S. Feld The Focused Organization of Social Ties , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[66]  Roger V. Gould,et al.  Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks , 1989 .

[67]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: Trust as an Organizing Principle , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[68]  C. Handy Trust and the virtual organization , 1999 .

[69]  James A. Davis,et al.  Constructing social research , 1994 .

[70]  P. Kollock The Emergence of Exchange Structures: An Experimental Study of Uncertainty, Commitment, and Trust , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[71]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[72]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[73]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[74]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[75]  Roger V. Gould MULTIPLE NETWORKS AND MOBILIZATION IN THE PARIS COMMUNE, 1871* , 1991 .

[76]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  --Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration : Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work , 2001 .

[77]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[78]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Power, Social Influence, and Sense Making: Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions. , 1993 .

[79]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[80]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research , 2002 .