Affordable zero emission housing: through life cost-benefit analysis to identify policy pathways for residential new-build in Melbourne, Australia

From an energy efficiency perspective, recent housing policy in Australia has focused on setting minimum energy standards in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Internationally, the UK and the USA have implemented definite policy targets of zero emission new housing by 2020. In Australia, the current minimum housing standard is '5 stars', increasing to '6 stars' by mid 2011. This policy direction has been strongly debated, and there remains uncertainty over the reliability of presented cost benefit data. A lack of empirical evidence has impeded the debate; particularly a lack of evidence on the through life costs and benefits of net zero and low emission housing options to private households and the costs and benefits of renewable energy technologies. This paper seeks to inform the present knowledge gap by applying cost benefit methods. AccuRate thermal simulation house modelling and lifecycle costing are applied to explore the costs and benefits across 50 year and 100 year time-horizons for net zero emission new house scenarios in Melbourne, Australia. Results show that net zero emission housing is economically viable at these time-horizons, with accumulated economic savings of a magnitude of 78% compared to a business as usual scenario over 50 years, with a 100% reduction of net energy emissions. Potential policy and regulatory pathways through which to achieve zero emission residential new-build based upon this empirical research are identified. This research provides empirical evidence to support stronger energy efficient housing standards and has significant implications for the future direction of housing standards in Australia. It argues that current housing standards policy is too narrow in focus, and that renewable energy aspects are presently overlooked.

[1]  V. Ismet Ugursal,et al.  Modeling of end-use energy consumption in the residential sector: A review of modeling techniques , 2009 .

[2]  John Burnett,et al.  City buildings : Eco-labels and shades of green! , 2007 .

[3]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  Assessing transitions to sustainable housing and communities in the UK , 2009 .

[4]  Brenda Vale,et al.  The New Autonomous House: Design and Planning for Sustainability , 2000 .

[5]  Grace K C Ding,et al.  Sustainable construction--the role of environmental assessment tools. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[7]  P. Torcellini,et al.  Zero Energy Buildings: A Critical Look at the Definition; Preprint , 2006 .

[8]  Scott B. Jackson,et al.  Economic Consequences of Firms' Depreciation Method Choice: Evidence from Capital Investments , 2009 .

[9]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  District heating and energy efficiency in detached houses of differing size and construction , 2009 .

[10]  Angelo Delsante,et al.  A VALIDATION OF THE 'ACCURATE' SIMULATION ENGINE USING BESTEST , 2004 .

[11]  Phillip John Jones,et al.  Modelling the built environment at an urban scale—Energy and health impacts in relation to housing , 2007 .

[12]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Translating Sustainabilities between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[13]  J. C. Requena,et al.  Reconciling Sustainability and Discounting in Cost Benefit Analysis: a methodological proposal , 2007 .

[14]  Rick Nevin,et al.  Evidence of rational market valuations for home energy efficiency , 1998 .

[15]  M. Jakob Marginal costs and co-benefits of energy efficiency investments: The case of the Swiss residential sector , 2006 .

[16]  Dorota Chwieduk,et al.  Towards sustainable-energy buildings , 2003 .

[17]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[18]  Andreas Uihlein,et al.  Policy options towards an energy efficient residential building stock in the EU-27 , 2010 .

[19]  Jim Walker,et al.  Extending cost-benefit analysis for energy investment choices , 1987 .

[20]  Ralph Horne,et al.  Affordable passive solar design in a temperate climate: An experiment in residential building orientation , 2011 .

[21]  Peter W. Newton,et al.  Hybrid buildings: pathways for greenhouse gas mitigation in the housing sector , 2009 .

[22]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[23]  Joseph Laquatra Housing market capitalization of thermal integrity , 1986 .

[24]  Steve Hatfield-Dodds,et al.  Energy affordability, living standards and emissions trading: Assessing the social impacts of achieving deep cuts in Australian greenhouse emissions , 2008 .

[25]  Paul Kenny,et al.  From net energy to zero energy buildings: Defining life cycle zero energy buildings (LC-ZEB) , 2010 .

[26]  Li Zhu,et al.  Comprehensive energy and economic analyses on a zero energy house versus a conventional house , 2009 .