Informed consent: moral necessity or illusion?

There is a professional and legal consensus about the clinical duty to obtain informed consent from patients before treating them. This duty is a reflection of wider cultural values about the moral importance of respect for individual autonomy. Recent research has raised practical problems about obtaining informed consent. Some patients have cognitive and emotional problems with understanding clinical information and do not apparently wish to participate in making decisions about their treatment. This paper argues that such research does not undermine their potential to provide informed consent. Rather, sufficient resources are required to create better communication skills among clinicians and more effective educational materials for patients. Finally, cognitive and emotional inequality among patients is maintained to be a reflection of wider social and economic inequalities. Researchers who take the right to informed consent seriously should also address these.

[1]  A. Lloyd,et al.  The extent of patients' understanding of the risk of treatments. , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[2]  R. Thomson,et al.  Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[3]  N. Dudley.  Importance of risk communication and decision making in cardiovascular conditions in older patients: a discussion paper. , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[4]  Michael Leahy.  Against Liberation: Putting Animals in Perspective , 1991 .

[5]  G. Lockwood,et al.  Are We Getting Informed Consent from Patients with Cancer? , 1990, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[6]  D Charnock,et al.  Helping patients access high quality health information , 1999, BMJ.

[7]  NJM London,et al.  Patients' ability to recall risk associated with treatment options , 1999, The Lancet.

[8]  N. Sembilan,et al.  A Code of Medical Ethics , 1886, Edinburgh Medical Journal.

[9]  A Coulter,et al.  Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? , 1999, BMJ.

[10]  T. Fahey,et al.  How do patients' treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians? , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[11]  L. Doyal.  Informed consent in medical research: Journals should not publish research to which patients have not given fully informed consent–with three exceptions , 1997 .

[12]  A Bowling,et al.  Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[13]  L. Doyal,et al.  Need for moral audit in evaluating quality in health care. , 1992, Quality in health care : QHC.

[14]  A Coulter,et al.  Partnerships with Patients: The Pros and Cons of Shared Clinical Decision-Making , 1997, Journal of health services research & policy.

[15]  A. Blenkinsopp,et al.  Partnership with patients , 1998, BMJ.

[16]  R. Deber,et al.  Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate. , 1994, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[17]  N. Modi.  Ethical and legal issues in neonatal research , 1998 .

[18]  L. Doyal,et al.  A Theory of Human Need , 1991 .

[19]  D M Trandel-Korenchuk,et al.  Patient participation in decision making. , 1982, The Nurse practitioner.

[20]  C. Bulpitt,et al.  Knowledge and communication difficulties for patients with chronic heart failure: qualitative study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  R A Stephenson,et al.  Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study. , 2000, JAMA.

[22]  W. Mackillop,et al.  Cancer patients' perceptions of their disease and its treatment. , 1988, British Journal of Cancer.