Identification of modal strains using sub-microstrain FBG data and a novel wavelength-shift detection algorithm

Abstract The presence of damage in a civil structure alters its stiffness and consequently its modal characteristics. The identification of these changes can provide engineers with useful information about the condition of a structure and constitutes the basic principle of the vibration-based structural health monitoring. While eigenfrequencies and mode shapes are the most commonly monitored modal characteristics, their sensitivity to structural damage may be low relative to their sensitivity to environmental influences. Modal strains or curvatures could offer an attractive alternative but current measurement techniques encounter difficulties in capturing the very small strain (sub-microstrain) levels occurring during ambient, or operational excitation, with sufficient accuracy. This paper investigates the ability to obtain sub-microstrain accuracy with standard fiber-optic Bragg gratings using a novel optical signal processing algorithm that identifies the wavelength shift with high accuracy and precision. The novel technique is validated in an extensive experimental modal analysis test on a steel I-beam which is instrumented with FBG sensors at its top and bottom flange. The raw wavelength FBG data are processed into strain values using both a novel correlation-based processing technique and a conventional peak tracking technique. Subsequently, the strain time series are used for identifying the beam's modal characteristics. Finally, the accuracy of both algorithms in identification of modal characteristics is extensively investigated.

[1]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge : environmental effects versus damage events , 2001 .

[2]  Oral Büyüköztürk,et al.  Structural Damage Detection Using Modal Strain Energy and Hybrid Multiobjective Optimization , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[3]  Antonio Quintela Incera,et al.  Fiber Optic Sensors in Structural Health Monitoring , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[4]  S. Vanlanduit,et al.  A novel fast phase correlation algorithm for peak wavelength detection of Fiber Bragg Grating sensors. , 2014, Optics express.

[5]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[6]  G. Meltz,et al.  Formation of Bragg gratings in optical fibers by a transverse holographic method. , 1989, Optics letters.

[7]  T. K. Gangopadhyay,et al.  Fibre Bragg gratings in structural health monitoring—Present status and applications , 2008 .

[8]  Liping Liu.  THEORY OF ELASTICITY , 2012 .

[9]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in operational modal analysis with stochastic subspace identification: Validation and applications , 2016 .

[10]  R.M. Gray,et al.  Communication systems: An introduction to signals and noise in electrical communication , 1976, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  N. Roveri,et al.  Real-time monitoring of railway infrastructures using fibre Bragg grating sensors , 2015 .

[12]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification , 2008 .

[13]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Adaptive modeling of environmental effects in modal parameters for damage detection in civil structures , 1998, Smart Structures.

[14]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Fiber Bragg grating sensors for structural health monitoring of Tsing Ma bridge : Background and experimental observation , 2006 .

[15]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Damage Detection of a Prestressed Concrete Beam Using Modal Strains , 2005 .

[16]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Reference-based combined deterministic–stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis , 2006 .

[17]  G. De Roeck,et al.  Vibration based Structural Health Monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment , 2008 .

[18]  E. R. Cohen.  An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements , 1998 .

[19]  Eleni Chatzi,et al.  Monitoring of a Novel Structure using Fiber Bragg Grating Strain Sensors , 2015 .

[20]  Branko Glisic,et al.  Fibre Optic Methods for Structural Health Monitoring , 2007 .

[21]  Alessandro De Stefano,et al.  Vibration-based monitoring of civil infrastructure: challenges and successes , 2011 .

[22]  Francis Berghmans,et al.  Influence of Fiber Bragg Grating Spectrum Degradation on the Performance of Sensor Interrogation Algorithms , 2014, Sensors.

[23]  Kai Liu,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of a composite bridge for high-speed trains , 2009 .

[24]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[25]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Strain flexibility identification of bridges from long-gauge strain measurements , 2015 .

[26]  Subhadarshi Nayak,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring: State of the Art and Perspectives , 2012 .

[27]  P. G. Bakir,et al.  Damage identification on the Tilff bridge by vibration monitoring using optical fiber strain sensors , 2005 .

[28]  P. Welch.  The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[29]  Branko Glisic,et al.  An Approach in Dynamic Monitoring Using Long-gage Fiber Optic Sensors , 2015 .

[30]  Kenneth G. McConnell,et al.  Modal testing , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[31]  Randall J. Allemang,et al.  THE MODAL ASSURANCE CRITERION–TWENTY YEARS OF USE AND ABUSE , 2003 .