Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection

Significance The introduction of genomic selection in dairy cattle improvement programs in 2008 was expected to increase rates of genetic gain, particularly for traits with low heritabilities, such as fertility and longevity. Our analysis of the US national dairy database found that generation intervals have decreased dramatically over the past 6 y, and selection intensity for lowly heritable traits has increased considerably. Genetic trends rapidly increased for fertility, lifespan, and udder health. These results clearly demonstrate the positive impact of genomic selection in US dairy cattle, even though this technology has only been in use for a short time. This progress in US Holsteins will have a favorable impact on other populations worldwide due to the widespread dissemination of US germplasm. Seven years after the introduction of genomic selection in the United States, it is now possible to evaluate the impact of this technology on the population. Selection differential(s) (SD) and generation interval(s) (GI) were characterized in a four-path selection model that included sire(s) of bulls (SB), sire(s) of cows (SC), dam(s) of bulls (DB), and dam(s) of cows (DC). Changes in SD over time were estimated for milk, fat, and protein yield; somatic cell score (SCS); productive life (PL); and daughter pregnancy rate (DPR) for the Holstein breed. In the period following implementation of genomic selection, dramatic reductions were seen in GI, especially the SB and SC paths. The SB GI reduced from ∼7 y to less than 2.5 y, and the DB GI fell from about 4 y to nearly 2.5 y. SD were relatively stable for yield traits, although modest gains were noted in recent years. The most dramatic response to genomic selection was observed for the lowly heritable traits DPR, PL, and SCS. Genetic trends changed from close to zero to large and favorable, resulting in rapid genetic improvement in fertility, lifespan, and health in a breed where these traits eroded over time. These results clearly demonstrate the positive impact of genomic selection in US dairy cattle, even though this technology has only been in use for a short time. Based on the four-path selection model, rates of genetic gain per year increased from ∼50–100% for yield traits and from threefold to fourfold for lowly heritable traits.

[1]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[2]  E. Wall,et al.  Understanding the genetics of survival in dairy cows. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  Ethics and farm animal welfare , 1988 .

[4]  G E Seidel,et al.  Superovulation and embryo transfer in cattle. , 1981, Science.

[5]  A. Robertson,et al.  Estimation of genetic gain in milk yield by selection in a closed herd of dairy cattle , 1950, Journal of Genetics.

[6]  P. VanRaden Invited review: selection on net merit to improve lifetime profit. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  L. D. Vleck,et al.  Estimates of Genetic Selection Differentials and Generation Intervals for Four Paths of Selection , 1991 .

[8]  T A Cooper,et al.  Technical note: adjustment of traditional cow evaluations to improve accuracy of genomic predictions. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  C. Schrooten,et al.  Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Productive life evaluations: calculation, accuracy, and economic value. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1961 .

[12]  S Mattalia,et al.  Three methods to validate the estimation of genetic trend for dairy cattle. , 1995, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  A. Robertson,et al.  The use of progeny testing with artificial insemination in dairy cattle , 1950, Journal of Genetics.

[14]  A. E. Freeman,et al.  Genetic parameters for yield traits of Holsteins, including lactose and somatic cell score. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  H. Simianer,et al.  Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs. , 2009, Journal of Dairy Science.

[16]  T A Cooper,et al.  The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  G. Wiggans,et al.  Method R estimates of heritability for milk, fat, and protein yields of United States dairy cattle. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Selection and mating considering expected inbreeding of future progeny. , 1999, Journal of Dairy Science.

[19]  Michel Georges,et al.  Velogenetics or the synergistic use of Marker Assisted Selection and Germ-Line Manipulation , 1991 .

[20]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Invited review: reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  S. Brotherstone,et al.  Artificial selection and maintenance of genetic variance in the global dairy cow population , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  I. Wilmut,et al.  Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line , 1996, Nature.

[24]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Economic aspects of mastitis: New developments , 2011, New Zealand veterinary journal.

[25]  M. Lucy,et al.  Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end? , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  L R Schaeffer,et al.  Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. , 2006, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[27]  A. Nejati-Javaremi,et al.  Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[28]  F. Miglior,et al.  Selection indices in Holstein cattle of various countries. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[29]  P M VanRaden,et al.  Development of a national genetic evaluation for cow fertility. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[30]  L. Johnson,et al.  Sex preselection: high-speed flow cytometric sorting of X and Y sperm for maximum efficiency. , 1999, Theriogenology.

[31]  R. Miller,et al.  Impact of genetic merit for milk somatic cell score of sires and maternal grandsires on herd life of their daughters. , 2009, Journal of Dairy Science.

[32]  E. Feuer,et al.  Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[33]  S. Harsh,et al.  Dairy cattle culling patterns, explanations, and implications. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[34]  M. Schutz,et al.  Selection on somatic cell score to improve resistance to mastitis in the United States. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[35]  I Misztal,et al.  Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection. , 2011, Genetics research.

[36]  P M Visscher,et al.  Strategies to utilize marker-quantitative trait loci associations. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[37]  M. Goddard,et al.  Accurate Prediction of Genetic Values for Complex Traits by Whole-Genome Resequencing , 2010, Genetics.

[38]  J E Pryce,et al.  Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[39]  M. Schutz,et al.  Genetic evaluation of somatic cell scores for United States dairy cattle. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[40]  M. Taverne,et al.  Aspiration of bovine oocytes during transvaginal ultrasound scanning of the ovaries. , 1988, Theriogenology.

[41]  D. Bickhart,et al.  Short communication: Use of young bulls in the United States. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[42]  G. Wiggans,et al.  Implementation of an Animal Model for Genetic Evaluation of Dairy Cattle in the United States , 1988 .

[43]  P. Boettcher,et al.  Potential Biases in Predicted Transmitting Abilities of Females from Preferential Treatment , 1994 .

[44]  K A Weigel,et al.  Use of linear type and production data to supplement early predicted transmitting abilities for productive life. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.

[45]  Paul M VanRaden,et al.  Measuring Genomic Pre-Selection in Theory and in Practice , 2013 .

[46]  I Misztal,et al.  Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[47]  M. Goddard,et al.  Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.