Toward accurate relative energy predictions of the bioactive conformation of drugs

Quantifying the relative energy of a ligand in its target‐bound state (i.e. the bioactive conformation) is essential to understand the process of molecular recognition, to optimize the potency of bioactive molecules and to increase the accuracy of structure‐based drug design methods. This is, nevertheless, seriously hampered by two interrelated issues, namely the difficulty in carrying out an exhaustive sampling of the conformational space and the shortcomings of the energy functions, usually based on parametric methods of limited accuracy. Matters are further complicated by the experimental uncertainty on the atomic coordinates, which precludes a univocal definition of the bioactive conformation. In this article we investigate the relative energy of bioactive conformations introducing two major improvements over previous studies: the use sophisticated QM‐based methods to take into account both the internal energy of the ligand and the solvation effect, and the application of physically meaningful constraints to refine the bioactive conformation. On a set of 99 drug‐like molecules, we find that, contrary to previous observations, two thirds of bioactive conformations lie within 0.5 kcal mol−1 of a local minimum, with penalties above 2.0kcal mol−1 being generally attributable to structural determination inaccuracies. The methodology herein described opens the door to obtain quantitative estimates of the energy of bioactive conformations and can be used both as an aid in refining crystallographic structures and as a tool in drug discovery. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 2009

[1]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings , 1997 .

[2]  Lionel A. Carreira,et al.  A RIGOROUS TEST FOR SPARC'S CHEMICAL REACTIVITY MODELS : ESTIMATION OF MORE THAN 4300 IONIZATION PKAS , 1995 .

[3]  Thierry Langer,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Protein-Bound Ligand Conformations with Respect to Catalyst's Conformational Space Subsampling Algorithms , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  S. Parthasarathy,et al.  On the correlation between the main-chain and side-chain atomic displacement parameters (B values) in high-resolution protein structures. , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[5]  J. Tomasi,et al.  Electrostatic interaction of a solute with a continuum. A direct utilizaion of AB initio molecular potentials for the prevision of solvent effects , 1981 .

[6]  Min Zhou,et al.  Understanding noncovalent interactions: ligand binding energy and catalytic efficiency from ligand-induced reductions in motion within receptors and enzymes. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[7]  D. Spellmeyer,et al.  Textbook of Drug Design and Discovery , 2003 .

[8]  Gordon M. Crippen,et al.  Prediction of Physicochemical Parameters by Atomic Contributions , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[9]  S. Martin,et al.  Ligand preorganization may be accompanied by entropic penalties in protein-ligand interactions. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[10]  F. Javier Luque,et al.  Extension of the MST model to the IEF formalism: HF and B3LYP parametrizations , 2005 .

[11]  W. L. Jorgensen The Many Roles of Computation in Drug Discovery , 2004, Science.

[12]  Bogdan Lesyng,et al.  Generalized Born model: Analysis, refinement, and applications to proteins , 2004 .

[13]  P Argos,et al.  Correlation between side chain mobility and conformation in protein structures. , 1997, Protein engineering.

[14]  Tamar Schlick,et al.  New Algorithms for Macromolecular Simulation , 2006 .

[15]  Tamar Schlick,et al.  New Algorithms for Macromolecular Simulation (Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering) , 2006 .

[16]  Dagmar Ringe,et al.  [19]Study of protein dynamics by X-ray diffraction , 1986 .

[17]  Manuel F. Ruiz-López,et al.  Basic ideas for the correction of semiempirical methods describing H-bonded systems , 2000 .

[18]  F. Javier Luque,et al.  Extension of the MST continuum solvation model to the RM1 semiempirical hamiltonian , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[19]  Gerard J Kleywegt,et al.  Application and limitations of X-ray crystallographic data in structure-based ligand and drug design. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[20]  Julian Tirado-Rives,et al.  Contribution of conformer focusing to the uncertainty in predicting free energies for protein-ligand binding. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[21]  C L Brooks,et al.  Do active site conformations of small ligands correspond to low free-energy solution structures? , 1998, Journal of computer-aided molecular design.

[22]  G J Kleywegt,et al.  Model building and refinement practice. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[23]  Yu. N. Morokov,et al.  Structure of small hydrogenated silicon clusters: global search of low-energy states , 1999 .

[24]  T. Halgren Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94 , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..

[25]  Ian A. Watson,et al.  Characteristic physical properties and structural fragments of marketed oral drugs. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[26]  M C Nicklaus,et al.  Conformational changes of small molecules binding to proteins. , 1995, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[27]  T. A. Jones,et al.  The Uppsala Electron-Density Server. , 2004, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[28]  J. Tomasi,et al.  The IEF version of the PCM solvation method: an overview of a new method addressed to study molecular solutes at the QM ab initio level , 1999 .

[29]  Stefan Senger,et al.  Sulfonamide-related conformational effects and their importance in structure-based design. , 2007, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[30]  X. Barril,et al.  Incorporating protein flexibility into docking and structure-based drug design , 2006, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[31]  R. Friesner Ab initio quantum chemistry: methodology and applications. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  Jonas Boström,et al.  Conformational energy penalties of protein-bound ligands , 1998, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[34]  P. Selzer,et al.  Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[35]  H. John Smith,et al.  Textbook of Drug Design and Discovery , 2002 .

[36]  P. Charifson,et al.  Conformational analysis of drug-like molecules bound to proteins: an extensive study of ligand reorganization upon binding. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.