Playing Dress-Up : Costumes , roleplay and imagination Philosophy of Computer Games January 24-27 Department of Social , Quantitative and Cognitive Sciences University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Ludica

In their canonical texts of game studies, both Huizinga and Caillois, each in and of his respective time, relegate dress-up dismissively to the sphere of girls’ play. Little has been written to-date on the subject; in this paper, we survey the literature on analog and digital dress-up. We argue for a deeper examination and legitimization of dress-up play as a means to infuse greater gender balance into both game studies and game design. In the West, adults are typically discouraged from playing dress-up, except in relegated and sanctioned contexts, such as Mardi Gras or masquerade parties. Practices such as Japanese “cosplay,” renaissance fairs, Live-Action Role-Playing games (LARPs), and co-performative events such as the Star Trek Conventions, DragonCon and Burning Man suggest a growing pattern of cultural practices around adult costume play. In the digital sphere, while massively multiplayer games tend to focus on team-based combat, players pay equal attention to clothing and fashion (often masked by the more masculine terminology of “gear”). The design and acquisition of virtual fashion is among the most popular activities in metaverse-type social worlds, such as Second Life and There.com. Cultural precedents for dress-up have been studied by performance anthropologists such as Victor Turner and Richard Schechner, who examined how the costume in ritual and theater create an embodied alternate persona for the wearer. We also see precedents of today’s MMOG gender transgression dress-up play in historical movements, from 18 th Century court culture to notorious cross-dressing Dadaists Marcel Duchmap and Man Ray. In social and cultural contexts, dress-up not only provides an opportunity for expression, but also occupies a unique intersubjective domain as players, whether physically or virtually costumed, can together create alternative worlds simply by “putting them on.” Dress-up also provides the opportunity for transformative play, for in dressing up and taking on new roles, we learn more about ourselves.

[1]  G. Mead,et al.  Mind, Self and Society. From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. , 1935 .

[2]  R. Morrison Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist , 1936 .

[3]  J. Huizinga Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture , 1938 .

[4]  J. Piaget Play, dreams and imitation in childhood , 1951 .

[5]  R. Caillois,et al.  Man, Play and Games , 1958 .

[6]  J. Eicher,et al.  Dress, Adornment and the Social Order , 1966 .

[7]  E. Goffman Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[8]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[9]  V. Turner From ritual to theatre : the human seriousness of play , 1986 .

[10]  Jack Santino Halloween in America: Contemporary Customs and Performances , 1983 .

[11]  J. Butler Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity , 1990 .

[12]  Henry Jenkins Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture , 1992 .

[13]  C. Bell Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions , 1997 .

[14]  S. Turkle Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[15]  A. C. Smith Smith on Jenkins, 'Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture' , 1997 .

[16]  Kimberly A. Miller,et al.  Dress: Private and Secret Self-Expression , 1997 .

[17]  J. Moran-Ellis The ambiguity of play , 1998 .

[18]  Gender Comparisons within Reenactment Costume: Theoretical Interpretations , 1998 .

[19]  Margaret Honey,et al.  Girl games and technological desire , 1998 .

[20]  Henry Jenkins,et al.  From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: gender and computer games , 1998 .

[21]  Bart G. Farkas Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask , 2000 .

[22]  Celia Pearce,et al.  Emergent authorship: the next interactive revolution , 2002, Comput. Graph..

[23]  R. Kozinets Can Consumers Escape the Market? Emancipatory Illuminations from Burning Man , 2002 .

[24]  T. L. Taylor Intentional Bodies: Virtual Environments and the Designers Who Shape Them* , 2003 .

[25]  C. A. Hill,et al.  The Waves , 2003, Stars and Other Signs.

[26]  Cindy Poremba Player as author : digital games and agency , 2003 .

[27]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Project massive: a study of online gaming communities , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[28]  Donghun Chung,et al.  Something for Nothing: Understanding Purchasing Behaviors in Social Virtual Environments , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[29]  C. Pearce Playing ethnography: a study of emergent behaviour in online games and virtual worlds , 2006 .

[30]  Debbora Battaglia,et al.  Intertextual Enterprises: Writing Alternative Places and Meanings in the Media Mixed Networks of Yugioh , 2006 .

[31]  LeeNewton Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat , 2006 .

[32]  Celia Pearce,et al.  Getting girls into the game: Towards a "Virtuous Cycle" , 2007 .

[33]  Mark Lentczner,et al.  Second Life , 2007, USENIX Annual Technical Conference.

[34]  S. M. Suibhne Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and other Inmates , 2009 .

[35]  S. Mac Suibhne Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and other Inmates , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.