A semi-variogram approach for estimating stems per hectare in Eucalyptus grandis plantations using discrete-return lidar height data

Abstract Estimating stems per hectare (SPHA) for a given forest area from high spatial resolution remotely sensed data usually follows the identification of individual trees. A common method of tree identification is through local maxima filtering, which in the context of a lidar canopy height model (CHM), seeks to locate the highest value within a specified neighbourhood of pixels. Hence, specifying an appropriate window size is a critical consideration. This study investigated the potential of the semi-variogram range towards defining an average window size for a given plot within Eucalyptus species plantations. The analysis also included comparisons of CHMs with three pixel sizes (spatial resolutions) (0.2 m, 0.5 m, and 1 m) at lidar point density of 5 points/m 2 and three lidar point densities (1 point/m 2 , 3 points/m 2 , and 5 points/m 2 ). These variations were introduced to study the effect of interpolated height surface resolution and lidar point density, respectively, on the identification of trees. Semi-variogram analysis yielded range values that varied distinctly with spatial resolution and point density. Computation of SPHA based on the semi-variogram range values resulted in overall accuracies of 73%, 56%, and 41% for 0.2 m, 0.5 m, and 1 m resolutions, respectively. A comparative approach, that defines window size based on pre-determined tree spacing, yielded corresponding accuracies of 82%, 82%, and 68% at the respective CHM resolutions. Point density comparisons based on interpolated CHM of 0.2 m resolution and the semi-variogram approach resulted in similar results between 5 points/m 2 (73%) and 3 points/m 2 (70%), whereas 1 point/m 2 returned the lowest accuracy (56%). Similar trends with superior accuracies were observed using the pre-determined tree spacing approach from the same resolution CHM: 82% (5 points/m 2 ), 80% (3 points/m 2 ), and 74% (1 point/m 2 ). While all estimates were negatively biased, the CHM with a 0.2 m spatial resolution at a point density of 3 points/m 2 resulted in a reasonable level of accuracy, negating the need for high density (>3 points/m 2 ) lidar surveys for this purpose. It was concluded that the semi-variogram approach showed promise for estimation of SPHA, particularly due to its independence from a priori knowledge regarding the tree stocking of the plantation.

[1]  D. A. Hill,et al.  Combined high-density lidar and multispectral imagery for individual tree crown analysis , 2003 .

[2]  P. Gong,et al.  Detection of individual trees and estimation of tree height using LiDAR data , 2007, Journal of Forest Research.

[3]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Estimation of timber volume and stem density based on scanning laser altimetry and expected tree size distribution functions , 2004 .

[4]  Tomas Brandtberg,et al.  Automated delineation of individual tree crowns in high spatial resolution aerial images by multiple-scale analysis , 1998, Machine Vision and Applications.

[5]  Andrew T. Hudak,et al.  Discrete return lidar-based prediction of leaf area index in two conifer forests , 2008 .

[6]  W. Cohen,et al.  Semivariograms of digital imagery for analysis of conifer canopy structure. , 1990 .

[7]  Timothy G. Gregoire,et al.  Sampling Methods for Multiresource Forest Inventory , 1993 .

[8]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Spatial variation in land cover and choice of spatial resolution for remote sensing , 2004 .

[9]  E. Næsset Airborne laser scanning as a method in operational forest inventory: Status of accuracy assessments accomplished in Scandinavia , 2007 .

[10]  P. Treitz,et al.  Mapping stand-level forest biophysical variables for a mixedwood boreal forest using lidar: an examination of scanning density , 2006 .

[11]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[12]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[13]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The use of variograms in remote sensing: I , 1988 .

[14]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Comparison of forest attributes extracted from fine spatial resolution multispectral and lidar data , 2004 .

[15]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner , 2002 .

[16]  Patrick D. Gerard,et al.  Characterizing vertical forest structure using small-footprint airborne LiDAR , 2003 .

[17]  Alex C. Lee,et al.  A LiDAR-derived canopy density model for tree stem and crown mapping in Australian forests , 2007 .

[18]  S. Roberts,et al.  Influence of Fusing Lidar and Multispectral Imagery on Remotely Sensed Estimates of Stand Density and Mean Tree Height in a Managed Loblolly Pine Plantation , 2003, Forest Science.

[19]  Johan E. S. Fransson,et al.  Effects on estimation accuracy of forest variables using different pulse density of laser data , 2007 .

[20]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas , 1999 .

[21]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Estimating stand characteristics by combining single tree pattern recognition of digital video imagery and a theoretical diameter distribution model , 2003 .

[22]  B. Koch,et al.  Detection of individual tree crowns in airborne lidar data , 2006 .

[23]  F. Ackermann Airborne laser scanning : present status and future expectations , 1999 .

[24]  I. Burke,et al.  Estimating stand structure using discrete-return lidar: an example from low density, fire prone ponderosa pine forests , 2005 .

[25]  Tomas Brandtberg Detection and analysis of individual leaf-off tree crowns in small footprint, high sampling density lidar data from the eastern deciduous forest in North America , 2003 .

[26]  P. Curran The semivariogram in remote sensing: An introduction , 1988 .

[27]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Simulation study for finding optimal lidar acquisition parameters for forest height retrieval , 2005 .

[28]  P. Litkey,et al.  Algorithms and methods of airborne laser-scanning for forest measurements , 2004 .

[29]  Josée Lévesque,et al.  Airborne digital camera image semivariance for evaluation of forest structural damage at an acid mine site , 1999 .

[30]  K. Itten,et al.  LIDAR-based geometric reconstruction of boreal type forest stands at single tree level for forest and wildland fire management , 2004 .

[31]  N. Cressie Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares , 1985 .

[32]  M. Heurich Automatic recognition and measurement of single trees based on data from airborne laser scanning over the richly structured natural forests of the Bavarian Forest National Park , 2008 .

[33]  F. Gougeon A Crown-Following Approach to the Automatic Delineation of Individual Tree Crowns in High Spatial Resolution Aerial Images , 1995 .

[34]  Emilio Chuvieco,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index and covered ground from airborne laser scanner (Lidar) in two contrasting forests , 2004 .

[35]  B. St-Onge Automated forest structure mapping from high resolution imagery based on directional semivariogram estimates , 1997 .

[36]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[37]  Y. H. Shikoku,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF FOOTPRINT SIZE AND SAMPLING DENSITY IN AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING TO EXTRACT INDIVIDUAL TREES IN MOUNTAINOUS TERRAIN , 2004 .

[38]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .

[39]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Optical remote-sensing techniques for the assessment of forest inventory and biophysical parameters , 1998 .

[40]  Daniel Schmoldt,et al.  Computers and Electronics in Agriculture , 2017 .

[41]  Randolph H. Wynne,et al.  Estimating plot-le v el tree heights with lidar : local filtering with a canopy-height based v ariable window size , 2002 .

[42]  Hans R. Zuuring,et al.  A method for quantifying vertical forest structure , 1998 .

[43]  Yong Q. Tian,et al.  Estimating Basal Area and Stem Volume for Individual Trees from Lidar Data , 2007 .

[44]  Randolph H. Wynne,et al.  Estimating plot-level tree heights with lidar : local filtering with a canopy-height based variable window size , 2002 .

[45]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The use of variograms in remote sensing. I - Scene models and simulated images. II - Real digital images , 1988 .

[46]  Alex C. Lee,et al.  Quantifying Australian forest floristics and structure using small footprint LiDAR and large scale aerial photography , 2006 .

[47]  K. O. Niemann,et al.  Local Maximum Filtering for the Extraction of Tree Locations and Basal Area from High Spatial Resolution Imagery , 2000 .

[48]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of forest resources: three decades of research development , 2005 .

[49]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Estimation of Tree Height and Stem Volume on Plots Using Airborne Laser Scanning , 2003, Forest Science.

[50]  W. Cohen,et al.  An evaluation of alternate remote sensing products for forest inventory, monitoring, and mapping of Douglas-fir forests in western Oregon , 2001 .

[51]  T. J. Dean,et al.  Estimating individual tree leaf area in loblolly pine plantations using LiDAR-derived measurements of height and crown dimensions , 2005 .

[52]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Automated derivation of geographic window sizes for use in remote sensing digital image texture analysis , 1996 .

[53]  Tomislav Hengl,et al.  Finding the right pixel size , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[54]  J. Holmgren Prediction of tree height, basal area and stem volume in forest stands using airborne laser scanning , 2004 .

[55]  R. Webster,et al.  Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems , 1990, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[56]  M. Flood,et al.  LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure , 2003 .

[57]  Douglas J. King,et al.  Automated tree crown detection and delineation in high-resolution digital camera imagery of coniferous forest regeneration , 2002 .

[58]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Geostatistics and remote sensing , 1998 .

[59]  S. Popescu,et al.  Seeing the Trees in the Forest: Using Lidar and Multispectral Data Fusion with Local Filtering and Variable Window Size for Estimating Tree Height , 2004 .

[60]  E. Næsset Practical large-scale forest stand inventory using a small-footprint airborne scanning laser , 2004 .

[61]  S. Reutebuch,et al.  Light detection and ranging (LIDAR): an emerging tool for multiple resource inventory. , 2005 .

[62]  D. King,et al.  Development and evaluation of an automated tree detection-delineation algorithm for monitoring regenerating coniferous forests , 2005 .