Analysis of the sensitivity of death certificates in 440 hospital deaths: a comparison with necropsy findings.

BACKGROUND There is current heightened public interest in issues surrounding death certification and necropsy. The present study was initiated to determine the accuracy of death certification in providing a correct diagnosis in a series of adult deaths occurring in hospital, all of which were followed by a necropsy. METHOD We examined a series of 440 consecutive adult hospital necropsies performed at Addenbrooke's Hospital, without prior knowledge of the cause of death on the death certificate. The major causes of death at necropsy were subdivided on the basis of organ systems and subsequently compared with the cause of death stated on the death certificate. RESULTS There were 448 stated causes of death on the death certificates, compared with 508 causes recorded at necropsy. The overall sensitivity of the death certificate in predicting an individual cause of death was 0.47, with sensitivities ranging from 0.90 in the neurological system to 0.28 in the cardiovascular system, and the sensitivity for all malignant causes of death was 0.65. No significant overall differences were noted in respiratory, gastrointestinal, malignant, and "other" systems when comparing causes of death on the death certificate with those at necropsy. CONCLUSIONS There is a substantial discrepancy between the diagnosis given on death certificates compared with that at hospital necropsy. This paper discusses the importance of clinicopathological concordance and emphasises the importance of the necropsy in death certification.

[1]  M. D'Amico,et al.  Ill-defined and multiple causes on death certificates – A study of misclassification in mortality statistics , 1999, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[2]  M. Burke,et al.  Audit in forensic pathology. , 2000, The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology.

[3]  W. Mangano,et al.  Hospital autopsies: still valuable in their traditional role but in need of reform. , 2000, The West Virginia medical journal.

[4]  R. Omar,et al.  Incomplete and inaccurate death certification--the impact on research. , 2000, Journal of public health medicine.

[5]  K. Myers,et al.  Improving the accuracy of death certification. , 1998, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[6]  L. McWilliam,et al.  Can histopathologists diagnose bronchopneumonia? , 1995, Journal of clinical pathology.

[7]  R. Hanzlick,et al.  Improving the accuracy of death certificates. , 1993, JAMA.

[8]  J. Barber Improving accuracy of death certificates. , 1992, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[9]  R. Saracci,et al.  Is necropsy a valid monitor of clinical diagnosis performance? , 1991, BMJ.

[10]  T. Ashworth,et al.  Inadequacy of death certification: proposal for change. , 1991, Journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  A. Mulley,et al.  Age and the Declining Rate of Autopsy , 1986, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[12]  F. Mollo,et al.  Reliability of death certifications for different types of cancer. An autopsy survey. , 1986, Pathology, research and practice.

[13]  J. Laissue,et al.  [Significance of autopsy. Continuous evaluation of autopsy findings by internists]. , 1986, Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift.

[14]  H. Burdo,et al.  The autopsy as a measure of accuracy of the death certificate. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  L. Goldman,et al.  The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  D. Schottenfeld,et al.  The autopsy as a measure of accuracy of the death certificate. , 1982, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.

[17]  E. Mcgoogan,et al.  Necropsy: a yardstick for clinical diagnoses. , 1980, British medical journal.

[18]  S. Burrows The Postmortem Examination: Scientific Necessity or Folly? , 1975 .

[19]  M. Britton Diagnostic errors discovered at autopsy. , 2009, Acta medica Scandinavica.