Assessing Advances in the Assimilation of Radar Data and Other Mesoscale Observations within a Collaborative Forecasting-Research Environment

The impacts of assimilating radar data and other mesoscale observations in real-time, convection-allowing model forecasts were evaluated during the spring seasons of 2008 and 2009 as part of the Hazardous Weather Test Bed Spring Experiment activities. In tests of a prototype continental U.S.-scale forecast system, focusing primarily on regions with active deep convection at the initial time, assimilation of these observations had a positive impact. Daily interrogation of output by teams of modelers, forecasters, and verification experts provided additional insights into the value-added characteristics of the unique assimilation forecasts. This evaluation revealed that the positive effects of the assimilation were greatest during the first 3‐6 h of each forecast, appeared to be most pronounced with larger convective systems, and may have been related to a phase lag that sometimes developed when the convective-scale information was not assimilated. These preliminary results are currently being evaluated further using advanced objective verification techniques.

[1]  M. Xue,et al.  3DVAR and Cloud Analysis with WSR-88D Level-II Data for the Prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, Tornadic Thunderstorms. Part I: Cloud Analysis and Its Impact , 2006 .

[2]  Jidong Gao,et al.  The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS), storm-scale numerical weather prediction and data assimilation , 2003 .

[3]  Douglas K. Lilly,et al.  Numerical prediction of thunderstorms—has its time come? , 1990 .

[4]  Juanzhen Sun,et al.  Dynamical and Microphysical Retrieval from Doppler Radar Observations Using a Cloud Model and Its Adjoint. Part II: Retrieval Experiments of an Observed Florida Convective Storm , 1998 .

[5]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[6]  G. Thompson,et al.  Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization , 2008 .

[7]  J. Done,et al.  The next generation of NWP: explicit forecasts of convection using the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model , 2004 .

[8]  Steven E. Koch,et al.  THE USE OF SIMULATED RADAR REFLECTIVITY FIELDS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF MESOSCALE PHENOMENA FROM HIGH-RESOLUTION WRF MODEL FORECASTS , 2005 .

[9]  Steven J. Weiss,et al.  The operational High Resolution Window WRF model runs at NCEP: Advantages of multiple model runs for severe convective weather forecasting , 2008 .

[10]  D. Stephenson,et al.  A new intensity‐scale approach for the verification of spatial precipitation forecasts , 2004 .

[11]  Stanley G. Benjamin,et al.  CONVECTIVE-SCALE WARN-ON-FORECAST SYSTEM: A vision for 2020 , 2009 .

[12]  Mingjing Tong,et al.  Ensemble kalman filter assimilation of doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model : OSS experiments , 2005 .

[13]  E. Mlawer,et al.  Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave , 1997 .

[14]  Barbara G. Brown,et al.  Forecast verification: current status and future directions , 2008 .

[15]  Ming Xue,et al.  Short-range prediction of a heavy precipitation event by assimilating Chinese CINRAD-SA radar reflectivity data using complex cloud analysis , 2006 .

[16]  Jidong Gao,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Variational Data Analysis Method with Recursive Filter for Doppler Radars , 2004 .

[17]  W. Skamarock.  Evaluating Mesoscale NWP Models Using Kinetic Energy Spectra , 2004 .

[18]  Z. Janjic.  The Step-Mountain Eta Coordinate Model: Further Developments of the Convection, Viscous Sublayer, and Turbulence Closure Schemes , 1994 .

[19]  Shepard A. Clough,et al.  Impact of an improved longwave radiation model, RRTM, on the energy budget and thermodynamic properties of the NCAR community climate model, CCM3 , 2000 .

[20]  Alexander Khain,et al.  Microphysics, Radiation and Surface Processes in the Goddard Cumulus Ensemble (GCE) Model , 2003 .

[21]  R. Rotunno,et al.  Mesoscale Predictability of Moist Baroclinic Waves: Convection-Permitting Experiments and Multistage Error Growth Dynamics , 2007 .

[22]  Ming Hu,et al.  Impact of Configurations of Rapid Intermittent Assimilation of Wsr-88d Radar Data for the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Thunderstorm Case , 2022 .

[23]  Tianyou Yu,et al.  Multi-scale Analysis and Prediction of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell Storm Assimilating Radar and Surface Network Data using EnKF , 2003 .

[24]  J. McGinley,et al.  Improving QPE and Very Short Term QPF: An Initiative for a Community-Wide Integrated Approach , 2007 .

[25]  B. Brown,et al.  Object-Based Verification of Precipitation Forecasts. Part I: Methodology and Application to Mesoscale Rain Areas , 2006 .

[26]  J. Kain,et al.  Sensitivity of Several Performance Measures to Displacement Error, Bias, and Event Frequency , 2006 .

[27]  Nigel Roberts,et al.  Impact of Data Assimilation on Forecasting Convection over the United Kingdom Using a High-Resolution Version of the Met Office Unified Model , 2009 .

[28]  M. Xue.  3B.1 CAPS REALTIME STORM-SCALE ENSEMBLE AND HIGH-RESOLUTION FORECASTS AS PART OF THE NOAA HAZARDOUS WEATHER TESTBED 2007 SPRING EXPERIMENT , 2007 .

[29]  C. Snyder,et al.  A Multicase Comparative Assessment of the Ensemble Kalman Filter for Assimilation of Radar Observations. Part I: Storm-Scale Analyses , 2009 .

[30]  Ming Hu,et al.  3DVAR and Cloud Analysis with WSR-88D Level-II Data for the Prediction of the Fort Worth, Texas, Tornadic Thunderstorms. Part II: Impact of Radial Velocity Analysis via 3DVAR , 2006 .

[31]  Ming Xue,et al.  CAPS REALTIME 4-KM MULTI-MODEL CONVECTION-ALLOWING ENSEMBLE AND 1-KM CONVECTION-RESOLVING FORECASTS FOR THE NOAA HAZARDOUS WEATHER TESTBED 2009 SPRING EXPERIMENT , 2009 .

[32]  Kevin W. Manning,et al.  Experiences with 0–36-h Explicit Convective Forecasts with the WRF-ARW Model , 2008 .

[33]  Paul R. Janish,et al.  Subjective Verification of Numerical Models as a Component of a Broader Interaction between Research and Operations , 2003 .

[34]  S. J. Weiss,et al.  Some Practical Considerations Regarding Horizontal Resolution in the First Generation of Operational Convection-Allowing NWP , 2008 .

[35]  Ming Hu,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of cloud analysis with WSR‐88D reflectivity data for GSI and WRF‐ARW , 2007 .

[36]  M. Xue,et al.  Numerical Forecasts of the 15–16 June 2002 Southern Plains Mesoscale Convective System: Impact of Mesoscale Data and Cloud Analysis , 2006 .

[37]  E. Rogers,et al.  The NCEP North American Mesoscale Modeling System : Recent changes and future plans , 2009 .

[38]  B. Brown,et al.  APPLICATION OF THE MODE OBJECT-BASED VERIFICATION TOOL FOR THE EVALUATION OF MODEL PRECIPITATION FIELDS , 1992 .

[39]  Jordan G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2 , 2005 .