Electronic portfolios in the classroom: factors impacting teachers’ integration of new technologies and new pedagogies

This article presents the findings of a study on the use of an electronic portfolio (EP) in 16 elementary classrooms across Canada. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected to understand how teachers used EPs in their classrooms, to what extent they integrated the EP into their practice, and the factors influencing their use. Using expectancy theory, findings indicate that low implementers experienced significant technical obstacles and/or were reluctant to change their established practices, whereas high implementers reported feeling supported by their administration, experiencing growth in their teaching practice, and using more pedagogical practices that support self-regulated learning as a result of the scaffolding provided by the software.

[1]  Carolyn M. Evertson,et al.  Layers and links: Learning to juggle 'one more thing' in the classroom , 2007 .

[2]  Debra N. A. Hayes,et al.  ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[3]  P. Abrami,et al.  Directions for Research and Development on Electronic Portfolios , 2005 .

[4]  B. Zimmerman.  Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. , 2000 .

[5]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2005 .

[6]  Pedro F. Hernández-Ramos,et al.  If Not Here, Where? Understanding Teachers’ Use Of Technology In Silicon Valley Schools , 2005 .

[7]  Marjolein Drent,et al.  Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  Using Technology to Assist Children Learning to Read and Write , 2008 .

[9]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  Improving literacy and metacognition with electronic portfolios: Teaching and learning with ePEARL , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Michael Zellers,et al.  Electronic portfolios and metacognition: a phenomenological examination of the implementation of E-portfolios from the instructors' perspective , 2007 .

[11]  W. Firestone,et al.  Administrative support and teacher leadership in schools implementing reform , 2008 .

[12]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Computers Meet Classroom: Classroom Wins , 1993, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[13]  Stephen J. Norton,et al.  Can twenty years of technology education assist ‘grass roots’ syllabus implementation? , 2007 .

[14]  Eva Mary Bures,et al.  Encouraging Self-Regulated Learning through Electronic Portfolios. , 2007 .

[15]  Anne Wade,et al.  An Electronic Portfolio to Support Learning , 2005 .

[16]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[17]  Cheryl A. Franklin.  Factors That Influence Elementary Teachers Use of Computers , 2005 .

[18]  Terry C. Ley,et al.  Portfolios and Second Graders' Self-Assessments of Their Development as Writers. , 1996 .

[19]  P. Abrami,et al.  Implementing Computer Technologies: Teachers' Perceptions and Practices , 2006 .

[20]  Johan van Braak,et al.  The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[22]  E. Judson.  How Teachers Integrate Technology and Their Beliefs About Learning: Is There a Connection? , 2006 .

[23]  HadjithomaChristina,et al.  The use of ICT in primary schools within emerging communities of implementation , 2009 .

[24]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook , 1996 .

[25]  Lucy Avraamidou,et al.  Exploring the Influence of Web-Based Portfolio Development on Learning to Teach Elementary Science. , 2002 .

[26]  Yiasemina Karagiorgi,et al.  The use of ICT in primary schools within emerging communities of implementation , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Helen C. Barrett.  Researching Electronic Portfolios and Learner Engagement: The REFLECT Initiative , 2007 .

[28]  Nancy E. Perry.  Young children's self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. , 1998 .

[29]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) , 2009 .

[30]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Learning Activity Types , 2009 .

[31]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Mary Webb,et al.  A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology , 2004 .