The impact of sensorimotor experience on affective evaluation of dance

Past research demonstrates that we are more likely to positively evaluate a stimulus if we have had previous experience with that stimulus. This has been shown for judgment of faces, architecture, artworks and body movements. In contrast, other evidence suggests that this relationship can also work in the inverse direction, at least in the domain of watching dance. Specifically, it has been shown that in certain contexts, people derive greater pleasure from watching unfamiliar movements they would not be able to physically reproduce compared to simpler, familiar actions they could physically reproduce. It remains unknown, however, how different kinds of experience with complex actions, such as dance, might change observers' affective judgments of these movements. Our aim was to clarify the relationship between experience and affective evaluation of whole body movements. In a between-subjects design, participants received either physical dance training with a video game system, visual and auditory experience or auditory experience only. Participants' aesthetic preferences for dance stimuli were measured before and after the training sessions. Results show that participants from the physical training group not only improved their physical performance of the dance sequences, but also reported higher enjoyment and interest in the stimuli after training. This suggests that physically learning particular movements leads to greater enjoyment while observing them. These effects are not simply due to increased familiarity with audio or visual elements of the stimuli, as the other two training groups showed no increase in aesthetic ratings post-training. We suggest these results support an embodied simulation account of aesthetics, and discuss how the present findings contribute to a better understanding of the shaping of preferences by sensorimotor experience.

[1]  P. Hekkert,et al.  'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[2]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Representing others’ actions: the role of expertise in the aging mind , 2011, Psychological Research.

[3]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  Structural neuroplasticity in the sensorimotor network of professional female ballet dancers , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[4]  S. Tipper,et al.  Self produced and observed actions influence emotion: the roles of action fluency and eye gaze , 2008, Psychological research.

[5]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Neurocognitive control in dance perception and performance. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[6]  W. Sluckin,et al.  Some experimental studies of familiarity and liking , 1982 .

[7]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Motor Simulation without Motor Expertise: Enhanced Corticospinal Excitability in Visually Experienced Dance Spectators , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Heather Winskel,et al.  Perceiving dance: schematic expectations guide experts' scanning of a contemporary dance film. , 2010, Journal of dance medicine & science : official publication of the International Association for Dance Medicine & Science.

[10]  Sara Torriero,et al.  The What and How of Observational Learning , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Shared networks for auditory and motor processing in professional pianists: Evidence from fMRI conjunction , 2006, NeuroImage.

[12]  A. Jacobs,et al.  When we like what we know – A parametric fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity , 2013, Brain and Language.

[13]  Patricia Leighten,et al.  Novice Strategies for Understanding Paintings , 1989 .

[14]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  M. Heil,et al.  Expertise in dance modulates alpha/beta event‐related desynchronization during action observation , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[16]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[17]  D. Rubin,et al.  Comparing Correlated but Nonoverlapping Correlations , 1996 .

[18]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Corinne Jola,et al.  The experience of watching dance: phenomenological–neuroscience duets , 2012 .

[20]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Neuroaesthetics and beyond: new horizons in applying the science of the brain to the art of dance , 2012 .

[21]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Dissociable substrates for body motion and physical experience in the human action observation network , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  Julie Grèzes,et al.  The influence of visual and motor familiarity during action observation: An fMRI study using expertise. , 2005 .

[23]  Helen De Cruz,et al.  The artistic design stance and the interpretation of Paleolithic art. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[24]  Dai,et al.  Platelet activation. , 2020, Arteriosclerosis.

[25]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty , 2006, NeuroImage.

[26]  Alberto Fernández,et al.  Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Andrew A G Mattar,et al.  Motor Learning by Observing , 2005, Neuron.

[28]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[29]  S Zeki,et al.  The neurology of kinetic art. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  R. Passingham,et al.  Seeing or Doing? Influence of Visual and Motor Familiarity in Action Observation , 2006, Current Biology.

[31]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience , 1999 .

[32]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[33]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Action Prediction in Younger versus Older Adults: Neural Correlates of Motor Familiarity , 2013, PloS one.

[34]  S. Zeki,et al.  Neural correlates of beauty. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Michael J. Martinez,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj057 Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published October 12, 2005 The Neural Basis of Human Dance , 2022 .

[37]  V. Gallese,et al.  Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The influence of visual training on predicting complex action sequences , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[39]  Guido Orgs,et al.  Learning to like it: Aesthetic perception of bodies, movements and choreographic structure , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[40]  Oshin Vartanian,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings , 2004, Neuroreport.

[41]  H. Leder,et al.  A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. , 2004, British journal of psychology.

[42]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The Impact of Aesthetic Evaluation and Physical Ability on Dance Perception , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[43]  B. Montero,et al.  Practice makes perfect: the effect of dance training on the aesthetic judge , 2012 .

[44]  D. Berlyne Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, , 1974 .

[45]  D. E. Glaser,et al.  Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[46]  Gerard J. Fogarty,et al.  Construct Validity of the Profile of Mood States , 2003 .

[47]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders : A study in the appraisal of art , 1996 .

[48]  S. Tipper,et al.  Sensorimotor fluency influences affect: Evidence from electromyography , 2010 .

[49]  P. Haggard,et al.  Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation , 2010, Psychological research.

[50]  H. D. Cruz,et al.  The artistic design stance and the interpretation of Paleolithic art. , 2013 .