Maker Movement in Education: History and Prospects

The maker movement in education has been a revolution in waiting for a century. It rests on conceptual and technological pillars that have been engendered in schools and research labs for decades, such as project-based learning, constructivism, and technological tools for “making things,” such as physical computing kits, programming languages for novices, and inexpensive digital fabrication equipment. This chapter reconstructs the history of the maker movement in education analyzing five societal trends that made it come to life and reach widespread acceptance: (1) greater social acceptance of the ideas and tenets of progressive education, (2) countries vying to have an innovation-based economy, (3) growth of the mindshare and popularity of coding and making, (4) sharp reduction in cost of digital fabrication and physical computing technologies, and (5) development of more powerful, easier-to-use tools for learners, and more rigorous academic research about learning in makerspaces. The chapter also explicates the differences and historical origins of diverse types of spaces, such as Hackerspaces, FabLabs, Makerspaces, and commercial facilities such as the Techshop, and discusses educationally sound design principles for these spaces and their tools. Finally, strategies for adoption in large educational systems are suggested, such as the inclusion in national standards and the local generation of maker curricula by schools.

[1]  Randy Pausch,et al.  Alice: a 3-D tool for introductory programming concepts , 2000 .

[2]  Ngss Lead States Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[3]  Leah Buechley,et al.  A Construction Kit for Electronic Textiles , 2006, 2006 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[4]  Seymour Papert,et al.  What's the big idea? Toward a pedagogy of idea power , 2000, IBM Syst. J..

[5]  Gary S. Stager,et al.  Invent To Learn: Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom , 2013 .

[6]  Charles Alpheus Bennett History of Manual and Industrial Education, 1870 to 1917 , 1937 .

[7]  K. Peppler,et al.  Maker Movement Spreads Innovation One Project at a Time , 2013 .

[8]  Maria Montessori,et al.  Spontaneous Activity In Education , 1965 .

[9]  Paulo Blikstein Computationally Enhanced Toolkits for Children: Historical Review and a Framework for Future Design , 2015, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  Caroline McEnnis,et al.  FAB LAB: AN ALTERNATE MODEL OF ICT FOR DEVELOPMENT , 2002 .

[11]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Makeology : Makers as Learners (Volume 2) , 2016 .

[12]  Ernst von Glasersfeld,et al.  A Constructivist Approach to Teaching , 2012 .

[13]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[14]  Paulo Freire,et al.  Pedagogy of the Oppressed , 2019, Toward a Just World Order.

[15]  Leah Buechley,et al.  The LilyPad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education , 2008, CHI.

[16]  Luis C. Moll,et al.  Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms , 1992 .

[17]  Edwin Hutchins How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995 .

[18]  University of California-Davis,et al.  The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education , 2017 .

[19]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  Scratch: programming for all , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[20]  Daniel C. Edelson Design Research: What We Learn When We Engage in Design , 2002 .

[21]  S. Turkle,et al.  Epistemological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete. , 1992 .

[22]  Michael Eisenberg,et al.  Output Devices, Computation, and the Future of Mathematical Crafts , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[23]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  Multimodal learning analytics , 2013, LAK '13.

[25]  Ricardo Nemirovsky,et al.  Episodic Feelings and Transfer of Learning , 2011 .

[26]  Neil Gershenfeld,et al.  FAB: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop--from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication , 2005 .

[27]  Jonathan Bean,et al.  Making: movement or brand? , 2014, INTR.

[28]  Dale Dougherty,et al.  The Maker Mindset , 2013 .

[29]  H. Freudenthal Mathematics as an Educational Task , 1972 .

[30]  J. Dewey The child and the curriculum , 1902 .

[31]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[32]  Leah Buechley,et al.  Handcrafting textile interfaces from a kit-of-no-parts , 2010, TEI.

[33]  Marcelo Worsley,et al.  Children Are Not Hackers: Building a Culture of Powerful Ideas, Deep Learning, and Equity in the Maker Movement. , 2016 .

[34]  Glen Bull,et al.  Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. , 2005 .

[35]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  Digital Fabrication and Making' in Education: The Democratization of Invention , 2013 .

[36]  Bruce L. Sherin,et al.  A Comparison of Programming Languages and Algebraic Notation as Expressive Languages for Physics , 2001, Int. J. Comput. Math. Learn..

[37]  Marcelo Worsley,et al.  Towards the development of multimodal action based assessment , 2013, LAK '13.

[38]  Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry , 2003 .

[39]  Dor Abrahamson,et al.  Classroom model, model classroom: computer-supported methodology for investigating collaborative-learning pedagogy , 2007, CSCL.

[40]  Frank O'Malley,et al.  The Education of Man , 1944, The Review of Politics.

[41]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[42]  Erica Halverson,et al.  The Maker Movement in Education , 2014, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.

[43]  Robert Glaser,et al.  Individuals and Learning: The New Aptitudes , 1972 .

[44]  Michael Eisenberg,et al.  The LilyPad Arduino: Toward Wearable Engineering for Everyone , 2008, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[45]  John Cresswell,et al.  Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy : a framework for PISA 2006 , 2006 .