A Normative Model for Holonic Multi-agent Systems

Modeling and design of complex intelligent systems (Intelligent transportation systems, shared health information systems, resource sharing systems, Smart city management systems, etc.) is a very difficult task due to the lack of design processes capable of covering all the characteristics of these types of systems: systems that require both a hierarchical structure which allows to bring together different levels of abstraction within the same system and require the maintenance of regulation and social control of the various entities involved in these systems by using a set of norms. Holonic Multiagent System (HMAS) forms a promising approach to software engineering for the modeling and development of hierarchical complex systems. One of the main challenges currently faced in HMAS research is that of social control. In particular, how can the HMAS be configured and organised given their structure of control and regulation? One of the main solutions is to employ the use of norms. Therefore, norms have been proposed as a mechanism for coordinating and controlling of various entities behaviors involved in the system. In this paper, we propose a new model of norms adapted to the holonic structure of HMAS. To do this, (1) we introduce two new types of norms: internal (private) and external (public) norms; (2) we identify and verify the alignment between these two types of norms. These two types of norms have implications for the control, organization and structure of holons.

[1]  Stéphane Galland,et al.  ASPECS: an agent-oriented software process for engineering complex systems , 2010, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[2]  Annie S. Wu,et al.  The Current State of Normative Agent-Based Systems , 2011, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[3]  Jörg H. Siekmann,et al.  Holonic Multiagent Systems: A Foundation for the Organisation of Multiagent Systems , 2003, HoloMAS.

[4]  Carlos E. Alchourrón,et al.  On Law and Logic , 1996 .

[5]  A Koestler,et al.  Ghost in the Machine , 1970 .

[6]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Implementing norms in electronic institutions , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[7]  Guido Boella,et al.  Introduction to normative multiagent systems , 2006, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[8]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Artificial Social Systems , 1992, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  Paul McNamara,et al.  Deontic logic , 2006, Logic and the Modalities in the Twentieth Century.

[10]  Munindar P. Singh.  An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems: , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[11]  Olivier Boissier,et al.  MOISE+: towards a structural, functional, and deontic model for MAS organization , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[12]  Guido Boella,et al.  A Game-Theoretic Approach to Normative Multi-Agent Systems , 2007, Normative Multi-agent Systems.

[13]  P. J. Fitzgerald,et al.  Law and Logic , 1964 .

[14]  Sandip Sen,et al.  Emergence of Norms with Biased Interactions in Heterogeneous Agent Societies , 2007, 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Workshops.

[15]  Jacques Ferber,et al.  Multi-agent systems - an introduction to distributed artificial intelligence , 1999 .

[16]  Catherine Garbay,et al.  Normative multi-agent approach to support collaborative work in distributed tangible environments , 2012, CSCW.

[17]  Matthias Mittag.  A Legal Theoretical Approach to Criminal Procedure Law: The Structure of Rules in the German Code of Criminal Procedure , 2006, German Law Journal.

[18]  Stéphane Galland,et al.  Holonic Multi-Agent Systems , 2011, Self-organising Software.

[19]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Autonomous agents with norms , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[20]  Huib Aldewereld,et al.  Autonomy vs. Conformity: An Institutional Perspective on Norms and Protocols , 2007, The Knowledge Engineering Review.