An overview of economic issues in computer-assisted total joint arthroplasty.

Computer-assisted techniques have been successfully used in many surgical procedures. More recently, computer-assisted surgery has been used to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of implant alignment in total hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. However, the impact of computer-assisted surgery on long-term clinical outcomes and implant survivorship in total joint arthroplasty has yet to be documented. The adoption of computer-assisted surgical systems for use in total joint arthroplasty will be heavily influenced by the economic impact on the various stakeholders in the health-care system. Currently, there are mixed financial incentives for surgeons, hospitals, and payers to adopt and use computer-assisted surgical techniques for total joint arthroplasty. Careful consideration of the impact of computer-assisted surgery on surgeon and hospital productivity as well as the financial contribution of this technology to hospital profit margins would provide valuable insight into the adoption and widespread use of computer-assisted surgery.

[1]  Robert S. Huckman,et al.  Economic evaluation in orthopaedics. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  P. Scranton.  The cost effectiveness of streamlined care pathways and product standardization in total knee arthroplasty. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  Martin Buxton,et al.  Early assessment of the likely cost-effectiveness of a new technology: A Markov model with probabilistic sensitivity analysis of computer-assisted total knee replacement , 2006, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  S. Morshed,et al.  Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate new technologies in orthopaedics. The case of alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  M. Tingart,et al.  Navigation in total-knee arthroplastyCT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[6]  John Ko,et al.  Impact of Cost Reduction Programs on Short-Term Patient Outcome and Hospital Cost of Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Economic evaluation in total hip arthroplasty: analysis and review of the literature. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  Chih-Wei Chang,et al.  Kinematic navigation in total knee replacement--experience from the first 50 cases. , 2006, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[9]  Pak Lin Chin,et al.  Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[10]  K. Bozic,et al.  The economics of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. , 2010, The journal of knee surgery.

[11]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  M. Bolognesi,et al.  Computer Navigation versus Standard Instrumentation for TKA: A Single-Surgeon Experience , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  Jan Victor,et al.  Image-Based Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Leads to Lower Variability in Coronal Alignment , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  K. Buehler,et al.  Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  D. S. Pandher,et al.  Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  H. Sintonen,et al.  Costs and Cost-Effectiveness in Hip and Knee Replacements: A Prospective Study , 1997, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[17]  C. Boéri,et al.  Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. , 2001, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[18]  P. Katz,et al.  Hospital resource utilization for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  Michael Nogler,et al.  Navigation Improves Accuracy of Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  H. Sharifi,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  M. Janeček,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation , 2003, International Orthopaedics.

[22]  D. Cox,et al.  Cost comparison between bilateral simultaneous, staged, and unilateral total joint arthroplasty. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  R. Bourne,et al.  Cost Effectiveness of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  K. Bozic,et al.  Health care technology assessment. Basic principles and clinical applications. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  M. Tingart,et al.  Radiological results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty , 2004, International Orthopaedics.