Deformation of the North American plate interior from a decade of continuous GPS measurements

[1] A combination of two independent geodetic solutions using data from close to 300 continuous GPS stations covering the central and eastern United States shows that surface deformation in the North American plate interior is best fit by a model that includes rigid rotation of North America with respect to ITRF2000 and a component of strain qualitatively consistent with that expected from glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA). After correcting for the North American plate motion, residual horizontal velocities show a north-to-south deformation gradient of ∼1 mm yr−1, mostly localized between 1000 and 2200 km from the GIA center, corresponding to strain rates of about 10−9 yr−1. At distances farther than 2100 km from the GIA center, horizontal residual velocities are random with no evidence for regions of elevated strain rates. In particular, we find no detectable residual motion at the 95% confidence level in the New Madrid Seismic Zone, where the average weighted misfit of 0.7 mm yr−1 is the same as the weighted misfit of our rigid plate model. Vertical velocities show (1) a maximum uplift rate of 10 mm yr−1 at the assumed GIA center, (2) a hinge line located 1500 km from that center, and (3) a subsidence rate up to 1.4 mm yr−1 in the forebulge, with a maximum located about 2000 km from the GIA center. Our results have the potential to better constrain glacial isostatic adjustment models and contribute to a better definition of stable North America for tectonic and geodetic applications.

[1]  R. Geller,et al.  Earthquakes along the passive margin of eastern Canada , 1979 .

[2]  John G. Anderson.  Estimating the seismicity from geological structure for seismic-risk studies , 1979 .

[3]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Statistical tests of additional plate boundaries from plate motion inversions , 1984 .

[4]  W. Peltier.  Deglaciation‐induced vertical motion of the North American continent and transient lower mantle rheology , 1986 .

[5]  S. Stein,et al.  Passive Margin Earthquakes, Stresses and Rheology , 1989 .

[6]  H. Hasegawa,et al.  Spatial Correlation between Seismicity and Postglacial Rebound in Eastern Canada , 1989 .

[7]  M. Zoback,et al.  Rapid Intraplate Strain Accumulation in the New Madrid Seismic Zone , 1992, Science.

[8]  H. Philip,et al.  Ruptures of Major Earthquakes and Active Deformation in Mongolia and Its Surroundings , 1993 .

[9]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions , 1994 .

[10]  W. Peltier,et al.  Ice Age Paleotopography , 1994, Science.

[11]  W. Peltier.  VLBI baseline variations from the Ice-4G Model of postglacial rebound , 1995 .

[12]  M. Tuttle,et al.  Archeological and pedological evidence for large prehistoric earthquakes in the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States , 1995 .

[13]  K. Kelson,et al.  Multiple late Holocene earthquakes along the Reelfoot fault, central New Madrid seismic zone , 1996 .

[14]  J. Mitrovica,et al.  Glacial isostatic adjustment and the anomalous tide gauge record of eastern North America , 1996, Nature.

[15]  A. Johnston.  Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions—III. New Madrid 1811–1812, Charleston 1886 and Lisbon 1755 , 1996 .

[16]  W. Peltier.  Mantle Viscosity and Ice-Age Ice Sheet Topography , 1996, Science.

[17]  J. Mitrovica,et al.  Glacial isostatic adjustment and the anomalous tide gauge record of eastern North America , 1996, Nature.

[18]  D. Argus,et al.  Tests of the rigid-plate hypothesis and bounds on intraplate deformation using geodetic data from very long baseline interferometry , 1996 .

[19]  S. Stein,et al.  How rigid is the stable interior of the North American Plate , 1996 .

[20]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Southern California permanent GPS geodetic array: Error analysis of daily position estimates and site velocities , 1997 .

[21]  John Langbein,et al.  Correlated errors in geodetic time series: Implications for time‐dependent deformation , 1997 .

[22]  Peter Molnar,et al.  The field of crustal velocity in Asia calculated from Quaternary rates of slip on faults , 1997 .

[23]  J. Zumberge,et al.  Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks , 1997 .

[24]  S. Stein,et al.  Estimation of intraplate strain accumulation in the New Madrid seismic zone from repeat GPS surveys , 1998 .

[25]  A space geodetic target for mantle viscosity discrimination: Horizontal motions induced by glacial isostatic adjustment , 1998 .

[26]  M. Watkins,et al.  Glacial isostatic adjustment observed using very long baseline interferometry and satellite laser ranging geodesy , 1999 .

[27]  Robert H. Lafferty,et al.  New evidence for a large earthquake in the New Madrid seismic zone between A.D. 1400 and 1670 , 1999 .

[28]  T. Dixon,et al.  Noise in GPS coordinate time series , 1999 .

[29]  Newman,et al.  Slow deformation and lower seismic hazard at the new madrid seismic zone , 1999, Science.

[30]  S. Hough,et al.  On the Modified Mercalli intensities and magnitudes of the 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes , 2000 .

[31]  Kenner,et al.  A mechanical model for intraplate earthquakes: application to the new madrid seismic zone , 2000, Science.

[32]  Arthur L. Lerner-Lam,et al.  Geodetic constraints on the rigidity and relative motion of Eurasia and North America , 2000 .

[33]  A. Bent,et al.  Focal mechanisms for eastern Canadian earthquakes: 1 July-31 December 1998 , 2000 .

[34]  P. Johnston,et al.  Can deglaciation trigger earthquakes in N. America? , 2000 .

[35]  W. Prescott,et al.  Crustal deformation rates in central and eastern U.S. inferred from GPS , 2001 .

[36]  M. Zoback,et al.  Did deglaciation trigger intraplate seismicity in the New Madrid seismic zone , 2001 .

[37]  Michael Bevis,et al.  Motion and rigidity of the Pacific Plate and implications for plate boundary deformation , 2002 .

[38]  A. Bent,et al.  Focal Mechanisms for Eastern Canadian Earthquakes, 1994–2000 , 2002 .

[39]  Geoffrey Blewitt,et al.  Effect of annual signals on geodetic velocity , 2002 .

[40]  Timothy H. Dixon,et al.  REVEL: A model for Recent plate velocities from space geodesy , 2002 .

[41]  James L. Davis,et al.  Investigation of glacial isostatic adjustment in the northeast U.S. using GPS measurements , 2002 .

[42]  Zuheir Altamimi,et al.  ITRF2000: A new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for earth science applications , 2002 .

[43]  Richard A. Snay,et al.  The Synergistic CORS Program Continues to Evolve , 2002 .

[44]  S. Williams.  The effect of coloured noise on the uncertainties of rates estimated from geodetic time series , 2003 .

[45]  C. Demets,et al.  Crustal velocity field of Mexico from continuous GPS measurements, 1993 to June 2001: Implications for the neotectonics of Mexico , 2003 .

[46]  W. Peltier.  GLOBAL GLACIAL ISOSTASY AND THE SURFACE OF THE ICE-AGE EARTH: The ICE-5G (VM2) Model and GRACE , 2004 .

[47]  Yehuda Bock,et al.  Error analysis of continuous GPS position time series , 2004 .

[48]  Boudewijn Ambrosius,et al.  Angular velocities of Nubia and Somalia from continuous GPS data: implications on present-day relative kinematics , 2004 .

[49]  Jean-Mathieu Nocquet,et al.  Geodetic constraints on glacial isostatic adjustment in Europe , 2005 .

[50]  M. Ellis,et al.  Space geodetic evidence for rapid strain rates in the New Madrid seismic zone of central USA , 2005, Nature.

[51]  J. Beavan.  Noise properties of continuous GPS data from concrete pillar geodetic monuments in New Zealand and comparison with data from U.S. deep drilled braced monuments , 2005 .

[52]  S. Mazzotti,et al.  Rates and uncertainties on seismic moment and deformation in eastern Canada , 2005 .

[53]  T. James,et al.  GPS crustal strain, postglacial rebound, and seismic hazard in eastern North America: The Saint Lawrence valley example , 2005 .