ACCUMULATING POSTZYGOTIC ISOLATION GENES IN PARAPATRY: A NEW TWIST ON CHROMOSOMAL SPECIATION

Abstract Chromosomal rearrangements can promote reproductive isolation by reducing recombination along a large section of the genome. We model the effects of the genetic barrier to gene flow caused by a chromosomal rearrangement on the rate of accumulation of postzygotic isolation genes in parapatry. We find that, if reproductive isolation is produced by the accumulation in parapatry of sets of alleles compatible within but incompatible across species, chromosomal rearrangements are far more likely to favor it than classical genetic barriers without chromosomal changes. New evidence of the role of chromosomal rearrangements in parapatric speciation suggests that postzygotic isolation is often due to the accumulation of such incompatibilities. The model makes testable qualitative predictions about the genetic signature of speciation.

[1]  A. Kondrashov ACCUMULATION OF DOBZHANSKY‐MULLER INCOMPATIBILITIES WITHIN A SPATIALLY STRUCTURED POPULATION , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  C. A. Machado,et al.  Inferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNA sequence data: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[3]  Chung-I Wu The genic view of the process of speciation , 2001 .

[4]  L. Rieseberg,et al.  A genic view of species integration , 2001 .

[5]  M. Noor,et al.  Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Noor,et al.  Consequences of recombination rate variation on quantitative trait locus mapping studies. Simulations based on the Drosophila melanogaster genome. , 2001, Genetics.

[7]  J. Wall,et al.  Gene conversion and different population histories may explain the contrast between polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium levels. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  L H. Rieseberg,et al.  Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  Justin C. Fay,et al.  Positive and negative selection on the human genome. , 2001, Genetics.

[10]  N. Barton,et al.  Theory and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  H. A. Orr,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF POSTZYGOTIC ISOLATION: ACCUMULATING DOBZHANSKY‐MULLER INCOMPATIBILITIES , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome , 2001, Nature.

[13]  S. Gavrilets Waiting time to parapatric speciation , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  R. Hudson,et al.  Adjusting the focus on human variation. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[15]  H. A. Orr,et al.  Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. , 2000, Genetics.

[16]  S. Päällysaho,et al.  Localization of genes affecting species differences in male courtship song between Drosophila virilis and D. littoralis. , 2000, Genetical research.

[17]  Keith A. Gardner,et al.  Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species. , 1999, Genetics.

[18]  Sergey Gavrilets,et al.  A Dynamical Theory of Speciation on Holey Adaptive Landscapes , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[19]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Why sex and recombination? , 1998, Science.

[20]  Michael D. Vose,et al.  Rapid parapatric speciation on holey adaptive landscapes , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  M. Nordborg,et al.  The effect of gene conversion on intralocus associations. , 1998, Genetics.

[22]  A. Ruíz,et al.  On the fertility effects of pericentric inversions. , 1997, Genetics.

[23]  S. Gavrilets HYBRID ZONES WITH DOBZHANSKY‐TYPE EPISTATIC SELECTION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  Antonio Barbadilla,et al.  INVERSION LENGTH AND BREAKPOINT DISTRIBUTION IN THE DROSOPHILA BUZZATII SPECIES COMPLEX: IS INVERSION LENGTH A SELECTED TRAIT? , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  E. Betrán,et al.  Recombination and gene flux caused by gene conversion and crossing over in inversion heterokaryotypes. , 1997, Genetics.

[26]  N. Barton,et al.  The spread of an advantageous allele across a barrier: the effects of random drift and selection against heterozygotes. , 1997, Genetics.

[27]  H. A. Orr,et al.  Dobzhansky, Bateson, and the genetics of speciation. , 1996, Genetics.

[28]  J. Hey,et al.  The speciation history of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives: inferences from DNA sequence variation at the period locus. , 1996, Genetics.

[29]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. , 1995, Genetics.

[30]  S. Karlin,et al.  Theoretical recombination processes incorporating interference effects. , 1994, Theoretical population biology.

[31]  P. Sniegowski,et al.  The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1993, Genetics.

[32]  R. Mumme Delayed dispersal and cooperative breeding in the seychelles warbler. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  J. Coyne,et al.  Lack of underdominance in a naturally occurring pericentric inversion in Drosophila melanogaster and its implications for chromosome evolution. , 1991, Genetics.

[34]  Y. Sano,et al.  The genic nature of gamete eliminator in rice. , 1990, Genetics.

[35]  N. Barton,et al.  The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations , 1986, Heredity.

[36]  R. Lande,et al.  The fixation of chromosomal rearrangements in a subdivided population with local extinction and colonization , 1985, Heredity.

[37]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Genetic variation in recombination in Drosophila. I. Responses to selection and preliminary genetic analysis , 1985, Heredity.

[38]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Genetic variation in recombination in Drosophila. II. Genetic analysis of a high recombination stock , 1985, Heredity.

[39]  J. Felsenstein SKEPTICISM TOWARDS SANTA ROSALIA, OR WHY ARE THERE SO FEW KINDS OF ANIMALS? , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  N. Barton Gene flow past a cline , 1979, Heredity.

[41]  R. Lande EFFECTIVE DEME SIZES DURING LONG‐TERM EVOLUTION ESTIMATED FROM RATES OF CHROMOSOMAL REARRANGEMENT , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  A. Wilson,et al.  Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  D. Levin,et al.  Rates of evolution in seed plants: Net increase in diversity of chromosome numbers and species numbers through time. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  M. Slatkin Gene flow and selection in a cline. , 1973, Genetics.

[45]  C. Waddington,et al.  “Animal Cytology and Evolution” , 1955, Nature.

[46]  Sewall Wright,et al.  On the Probability of Fixation of Reciprocal Translocations , 1941, The American Naturalist.

[47]  T. Dobzhansky Studies on Hybrid Sterility. II. Localization of Sterility Factors in Drosophila Pseudoobscura Hybrids. , 1936, Genetics.