Servant, friend or master? The relationships users build with voice-controlled smart devices

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the different relationships consumers build with anthropomorphised devices and how these relationships affect actual and intended future usage. An exploratory, three-week empirical study of 39 informants using voice controls on their smartphone uncovered a diversity of relationships that the informants built with such devices. We complement anthropomorphism theory by drawing on extended-self theorising to identify three primary roles that emerge from consumers’ interactions with these devices. Our findings theorise the distinct ways in which consumers perceive the object agency of anthropomorphised smart devices and how these perceptions impact the consumers’ engagement and future use intentions.

[1]  Robert V. Kozinets,et al.  Technology/Ideology: How Ideological Fields Influence Consumers’ Technology Narratives , 2008 .

[2]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Avatar Color and Social Identity Effects On Attitudes and Group Dynamics in Online Video Games , 2006 .

[3]  Victoria K. Wells.  Foraging: An ecology model of consumer behaviour? , 2012 .

[4]  P. Aggarwal,et al.  Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products , 2007 .

[5]  S. Fournier,et al.  Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research , 1998 .

[6]  Marina Puzakova,et al.  When Humanizing Brands Goes Wrong: The Detrimental Effect of Brand Anthropomorphization amid Product Wrongdoings , 2013 .

[7]  J. Reichertz,et al.  Abduction: The Logic of Discovery of Grounded Theory , 2009 .

[8]  Jörg Strübing,et al.  Research as Pragmatic Problem-solving: The Pragmatist Roots of Empirically-grounded Theorizing , 2007 .

[9]  Felicitas Morhart,et al.  Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale , 2013 .

[10]  C. Veloutsou.  Identifying the Dimensions of the Product-Brand and Consumer Relationship , 2007 .

[11]  Thomas Kramer,et al.  Do Materialists Prefer the “Brand-as-Servant”? The Interactive Effect of Anthropomorphized Brand Roles and Materialism on Consumer Responses , 2015 .

[12]  E. Hultink,et al.  “Honey, Have You Seen Our Hamster?” Consumer Evaluations of Autonomous Domestic Products , 2003 .

[13]  Y. Ibrahim,et al.  Deconstructing the meerkat: fabular anthropomorphism, popular culture, and the market , 2013 .

[14]  R. Belk.  Extended Self in a Digital World , 2013 .

[15]  Russell W. Belk,et al.  Digital consumption and the extended self , 2014 .

[16]  Min-Sun Kim,et al.  Humanoid robots as “The Cultural Other”: are we able to love our creations? , 2012, AI & SOCIETY.

[17]  S. Timmermans,et al.  Theory Construction in Qualitative Research , 2012 .

[18]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Making Sense by Making Sentient : Effectance Motivation Increases , 2010 .

[19]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Use does not wear ragged the fabric of friendship: Thinking of objects as alive makes people less willing to replace them , 2010 .

[20]  Wenyu Dou,et al.  The Internet of Things and interaction style: the effect of smart interaction on brand attachment , 2017 .

[21]  J. Tam,et al.  Customer Satisfaction, Service Quality and Perceived Value: An Integrative Model , 2004 .

[22]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Humans, Animals, and Robots: A Phenomenological Approach to Human-Robot Relations , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[23]  I. Hodder.  Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships Between Humans and Things , 2012 .

[24]  M. Slater,et al.  Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of object sizes and implicit attitude changes , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Fiona Schweitzer,et al.  To Be or Not to Be in Thrall to the March of Smart Products , 2016, Psychology & marketing.

[26]  S. Fournier,et al.  Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies , 1998 .

[27]  E. A. V. D. Hende,et al.  Investigating Gender‐Schema Congruity Effects on Consumers’ Evaluation of Anthropomorphized Products , 2014 .

[28]  M. Bing,et al.  The Effects of Brand Metaphors as Design Innovation: A Test of Congruency Hypotheses , 2013 .

[29]  Michael S. W. Lee,et al.  Anti-consumption, Materialism, and Consumer Well-being , 2016 .

[30]  R. Belk.  Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[31]  J. Christopher Brill,et al.  Natural-Born Cyborgs – Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence by Andy Clark 2003, 229 pages, $26.00 New York Oxford University Press ISBN 0-19-514866-5 , 2004 .

[32]  M. Royne,et al.  The human lens: How anthropomorphic reasoning varies by product complexity and enhances personal value , 2013 .

[33]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Unlocking value from machines: business models and the industrial internet of things , 2017 .

[34]  Aner Sela,et al.  How Experience Variety Shapes Postpurchase Product Evaluation , 2016 .

[35]  Jan R. Landwehr,et al.  It's Got the Look: The Effect of Friendly and Aggressive “Facial” Expressions on Product Liking and Sales , 2011 .

[36]  S. Blatt,et al.  Individuality and relatedness: Evolution of a fundamental dialectic. , 1994 .

[37]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Construing Consumer Decision Making , 2007 .

[38]  Erik Jan Hultink,et al.  How Today’s Consumers Perceive Tomorrow’s Smart Products , 2007 .

[39]  J. Bailenson,et al.  Transformed Representation 1 RUNNING HEAD: TRANSFORMED REPRESENTATION The Proteus Effect: Implications of Transformed Digital Self-Representation on Online and Offline Behavior , 2008 .

[40]  Peter Smagorinsky,et al.  The Reliability and Validity of Protocol Analysis , 1989 .

[41]  M. Sääksjärvi,et al.  Development of a scale measuring childlike anthropomorphism in products , 2013 .

[42]  Leslie Marsh.  Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence , 2009 .

[43]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions , 1993 .

[44]  E. Wan,et al.  Judging a Book by Its Cover? The Effect of Anthropomorphism on Product Attribute Processing and Consumer Preference , 2016 .

[45]  A. David Redish,et al.  Memory and decision making , 2015, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[46]  R. Belk.  Understanding the robot: Comments on Goudey and Bonnin (2016) , 2016 .

[47]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[48]  Bang Nguyen,et al.  The integrity challenge of the Internet-of-Things (IoT): on understanding its dark side , 2017 .

[49]  W. Hofmann,et al.  When Temptations Come Alive: How Anthropomorphism Undermines Self-Control , 2015 .

[50]  Jean-Paul Dionne,et al.  Accessing Problem-Solving Strategy Knowledge: The Complementary Use of Concurrent Verbal Protocols and Retrospective Debriefing. , 2000 .

[51]  Zied Mani,et al.  Drivers of consumers’ resistance to smart products , 2017 .

[52]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Consumer and Object Experience in the Internet of Things: An Assemblage Theory Approach , 2018 .

[53]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[54]  Adam Richardson,et al.  Using Customer Journey Maps to Improve Customer Experience , 2015 .

[55]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Curvilinear Effects of Consumer Loyalty Determinants in Relational Exchanges , 2005 .

[56]  Sara Kim,et al.  Anthropomorphized Helpers Undermine Autonomy and Enjoyment in Computer Games , 2016 .

[57]  A. Aron,et al.  Love and the expansion of self: Understanding attraction and satisfaction. , 1988 .

[58]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Measuring Consumer Innovativeness , 1991 .

[59]  Hirofumi Katsuno,et al.  The Robot's Heart: Tinkering with Humanity and Intimacy in Robot-Building , 2011 .

[60]  Pallab Paul,et al.  A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. , 2000, The American journal of psychology.

[61]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[62]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Creating Social Connection Through Inferential Reproduction , 2008, Psychological science.

[63]  Antonia Mantonakis,et al.  Consumer Memory, Fluency, and Familiarity , 2008 .

[64]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .