Assessing the Effectiveness of Tradable Landuse Rights for Biodiversity Conservation: An Application to Canada's Boreal Mixedwood Forest

Ecological reserve networks are an important strategy for conserving biodiversity. One approach to selecting reserves is to use optimization algorithms that maximize an ecological objective function subject to a total reserve area constraint. Under this approach, economic factors such as potential land values and tenure arrangements are often ignored. Tradable landuse rights are proposed as an alternative economic mechanism for selecting reserves. Under this approach economic considerations determine the spatial distribution of development and reserves are allocated to sites with the lowest development value, minimizing the cost of the reserve network. The configuration of the reserve network as well as the biodiversity outcome is determined as a residual. However cost savings can be used to increase the total amount of area in reserve and improve biodiversity outcomes. The appropriateness of this approach for regional planning is discussed in light of key uncertainties associated with biodiversity protection. A comparison of biodiversity outcomes and costs under ecological versus economic approaches is undertaken for the Boreal Forest Natural Region of Alberta, Canada. We find a significant increase in total area protected and an increase in species representation under the TLR approach.

[1]  Martin L. Weitzman,et al.  An Application of Diversity Theory to Crane Conservation , 1993 .

[2]  Les G. Underhill,et al.  Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms , 1994 .

[3]  P. Pearse.  Introduction to Forestry Economics , 2002 .

[4]  W. Adamowicz,et al.  Coarse Filter Ecosystem Management in a Nonequilibrating Forest , 2003, Forest Science.

[5]  J. Lawton,et al.  The Gaps between Theory and Practice in Selecting Nature Reserves , 1999 .

[6]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  HABITAT LOSS AND FRAGMENTATION IN DYNAMIC LANDSCAPES: AVIAN PERSPECTIVES FROM THE BOREAL FOREST* , 2002 .

[7]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Ad Hoc Reservations: Forward or Backward Steps in Developing Representative Reserve Systems? , 1994 .

[8]  C. Puppe,et al.  A Theory of Diversity , 2002 .

[9]  W. Walls,et al.  Competition in a Repeated Spatial Auction Market with an Application to Timber Sales , 1999 .

[10]  Harvey R. Doerksen,et al.  Allocating scarce resources for endangered species recovery , 1995 .

[11]  L. Fahrig.  How much habitat is enough , 2001 .

[12]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Tradable Land-Use Rights for Cumulative Environmental Effects Management , 2002 .

[13]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  INDEPENDENT EFFECTS OF FOREST COVER AND FRAGMENTATION ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF FOREST BREEDING BIRDS , 1999 .

[14]  W. Montgomery,et al.  Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs" Journal of Economic Theory , 1972 .

[15]  H. Weikard.  Diversity Functions and the Value of Biodiversity , 2002, Land Economics.

[16]  Francesco Pigliaru,et al.  How Fast are the Tourism Countries Growing? The Cross-Country Evidence , 2003 .

[17]  C. Hendee,et al.  Introduction to forestry , 2002 .

[18]  T. Tietenberg.  The Tradable Permits Approach to Protecting the Commons: What Have We Learned? , 2002 .

[19]  Martin L. Weitzman,et al.  Conflicts and Choices in Biodiversity Preservation , 1998 .

[20]  Richard L. Church,et al.  Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem , 1996 .

[21]  Monica Eberle,et al.  Theoretical topics in ecological economics , 2003 .

[22]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation , 1998, Science.

[23]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much? , 1996 .

[24]  D. P. Faith,et al.  Integrating conservation and development: effective trade-offs between biodiversity and cost in the selection of protected areas , 1996, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[25]  Michael Ash.  Pollution Abatement Investment When Firms Lobby Against Environmental Regulation , 2002 .

[26]  C. Flather,et al.  Accounting for connectivity and spatial correlation in the optimal placement of wildlife habitat , 1996 .

[27]  K. Kirby,et al.  The conservation of a fragmented ecosystem within a cultural landscape—The case of ancient woodland in England , 1997 .

[28]  F. van Langevelde,et al.  Competing land use in the reserve site selection problem , 2000, Landscape Ecology.

[29]  Alberto Petrucci,et al.  Taxing Land Rent in an Open Economy , 2003 .

[30]  Mansell,et al.  Biodiversity assessment and conservation strategies , 1998, Science.

[31]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice , 1991 .

[32]  Steven R. Beissinger,et al.  Why Economics Matters for Endangered Species Protection , 1999 .

[33]  S. Polasky,et al.  Selecting Biological Reserves Cost-Effectively: An Application to Terrestrial Vertebrate Conservation in Oregon , 2001, Land Economics.

[34]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[35]  Manuela M. P. Huso,et al.  A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon , 1997 .

[36]  H. M. Yildiz.  National Versus International Mergers and Trade Liberalization , 2003 .

[37]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Integrating conservation and forestry production: exploring trade-offs between biodiversity and production in regional land-use assessment , 1996 .

[38]  Andrew R. Solow,et al.  A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection , 1996 .

[39]  D. Simberloff.  Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passé in the landscape era? , 1998 .