In vivo delineation of subdivisions of the human amygdaloid complex in a high‐resolution group template

The nuclei of the human amygdala remain difficult to distinguish in individual subject structural magnetic resonance images. However, interpretation of the amygdala's role in whole brain networks requires accurate localization of functional activity to a particular nucleus or subgroup of nuclei. To address this, high spatial resolution, three‐dimensional templates, using joint high accuracy diffeomorphic registration of T1‐ and T2‐weighted structural images from 168 typical adults between 22 and 35 years old released by the Human Connectome Project were constructed. Several internuclear boundaries are clearly visible in these templates, which would otherwise be impossible to delineate in individual subject data. A probabilistic atlas of major nuclei and nuclear groups was constructed in this template space and mapped back to individual spaces by inversion of the individual diffeomorphisms. Group level analyses revealed a slight (∼2%) bias toward larger total amygdala and nuclear volumes in the right hemisphere. No substantial sex or age differences were found in amygdala volumes normalized to total intracranial volume, or subdivision volumes normalized to amygdala volume. The current delineation provides a finer parcellation of the amygdala with more accurate external boundary definition than current histology‐based atlases when used in conjunction with high accuracy registration methods, such as diffeomorphic warping. These templates and delineation are intended to be an open and evolving resource for future functional and structural imaging studies of the human amygdala. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3979–3998, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Dennis S. Charney,et al.  Amygdala volume in depressed patients with bipolar disorder assessed using high resolution 3T MRI: The impact of medication , 2010, NeuroImage.

[2]  Jarrod D. Hadfield,et al.  MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models , 2010 .

[3]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[4]  M. Mallar Chakravarty,et al.  Quantitative comparison of 21 protocols for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions in in vivo MRI: Towards a harmonized segmentation protocol , 2015, NeuroImage.

[5]  G Lohmann,et al.  Parcellation of the human amygdala using 7T structural MRI , 2009, NeuroImage.

[6]  A. David,et al.  The human amygdala: a systematic review and meta-analysis of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, Brain Research Reviews.

[7]  E. Lauterbach The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion, Memory, and Mental Dysfunction , 1993 .

[8]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[9]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[10]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies , 2011, NeuroImage.

[11]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Deep and Superficial Amygdala Nuclei Projections Revealed In Vivo by Probabilistic Tractography , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  The optimal template effect in hippocampus studies of diseased populations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Connectivity-based segmentation of human amygdala nuclei using probabilistic tractography , 2011, NeuroImage.

[14]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging segments the human amygdala in vivo , 2010, NeuroImage.

[15]  Ryan K. Jessup,et al.  Differentiable contributions of human amygdalar subregions in the computations underlying reward and avoidance learning , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[16]  Allan R. Jones,et al.  An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome , 2012, Nature.

[17]  D. Amaral,et al.  Organization of the intrinsic connections of the monkey amygdaloid complex: Projections originating in the lateral nucleus , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[19]  Jakub Hort,et al.  Volumetry of the human amygdala — An anatomical study , 2010, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[20]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Multivariate Normalization with Symmetric Diffeomorphisms for Multivariate Studies , 2007, MICCAI.

[21]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[22]  Agustín González,et al.  Evolution of the amygdaloid complex in vertebrates, with special reference to the anamnio‐amniotic transition , 2007, Journal of anatomy.

[23]  N. Daw,et al.  Differential roles of human striatum and amygdala in associative learning , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Arno Klein,et al.  Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration , 2009, NeuroImage.

[25]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Ahmad R. Hariri,et al.  Beyond Genotype: Serotonin Transporter Epigenetic Modification Predicts Human Brain Function , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[28]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[29]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences What Does the Amygdala Contribute to Social Cognition? , 2022 .

[30]  Bradford C. Dickerson,et al.  Intrinsic Amygdala–Cortical Functional Connectivity Predicts Social Network Size in Humans , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  S. Rauch,et al.  Structural brain magnetic resonance imaging of limbic and thalamic volumes in pediatric bipolar disorder. , 2005, The American journal of psychiatry.

[32]  Brian Avants,et al.  Multivariate analysis of structural and diffusion imaging in traumatic brain injury. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[33]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[34]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  BEaST: Brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique , 2012, NeuroImage.

[35]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[36]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Histology-derived volumetric annotation of the human hippocampal subfields in postmortem MRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[37]  Lucía Prensa,et al.  Stereological Analysis of Neuron, Glial and Endothelial Cell Numbers in the Human Amygdaloid Complex , 2012, PloS one.

[38]  K. Amunts,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps , 2005, Anatomy and Embryology.

[39]  Jarrod Had MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package , 2010 .

[40]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Accurate, Robust, and Automated Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Brain Change Analysis , 2002, NeuroImage.

[41]  M. Mallar Chakravarty,et al.  Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates , 2014, NeuroImage.

[42]  J Mazziotta,et al.  A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[43]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[44]  Polina Golland,et al.  Automated segmentation of hippocampal subfields from ultra‐high resolution in vivo MRI , 2009, Hippocampus.

[45]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Testing anatomically specified hypotheses in functional imaging using cytoarchitectonic maps , 2006, NeuroImage.

[46]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Regional Spatial Normalization: Toward an Optimal Target , 2001, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[47]  Bradford C. Dickerson,et al.  A reliable protocol for the manual segmentation of the human amygdala and its subregions using ultra-high resolution MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[48]  A. McDonald Cortical pathways to the mammalian amygdala , 1998, Progress in Neurobiology.