Two-stage ensemble-based history matching with multiple modes in the objective function

Application of the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) to parameter estimation problems in reservoir engineering has increased steadily in the last few years. This increase has been driven primarily by the ease of implementing this technique on large scale history matching problems and the relatively low computational cost (adjoint computation is unnecessary). Although EnKF is optimal for multivariate Gaussian model variables and linear data model, acceptable history matching results have been obtained for mild deviations from these optimality conditions. In the presence of strong nonlinearities and for problems with multimodal probability distribution functions (PDFs), the history matching results from implementing EnKF are generally poor. In this paper we present an approach to improving the performance of EnKF for history matching problems with multiple modes by proposing a two-stage ensemble-based technique. This type of problem is not handled well by the traditional EnKF or the ensemble smoother. Our proposed approach utilizes two data assimilation stages to generate conditional samples of the reservoir model around a mode of the posterior multimodal PDF. We demonstrate the applicability of this approach on a low-order reservoir model and show that compared to the standard EnKF, the two-stage ensemble-based technique improved the history match quality significantly and much better estimates of the model variables were obtained. Although the predictions from the final ensemble using our technique may not quantify the full prediction uncertainty, we note that the objective in this case is primarily to obtain acceptable matches to production measurements, which may be used to quantify some local uncertainty.

[1]  Laura Dovera,et al.  Multimodal ensemble Kalman filtering using Gaussian mixture models , 2011 .

[2]  Keston W. Smith Cluster ensemble Kalman filter , 2007 .

[3]  F. Roggero,et al.  Reducing Uncertainties in Production Forecasts by Constraining Geological Modeling to Dynamic Data , 1999 .

[4]  Rolf Johan Lorentzen,et al.  Analysis of the ensemble Kalman filter for estimation of permeability and porosity in reservoir models , 2005 .

[5]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  History Matching of the PUNQ-S3 Reservoir Model Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2004 .

[6]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  Experimental Assessment of Gradual Deformation Method , 2004 .

[7]  Henning Omre,et al.  Uncertainty in Production Forecasts based on Well Observations, Seismic Data and Production History , 2001 .

[8]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  A Hybrid Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method for Generating Permeability Fields Conditioned to Multiwell Pressure Data and Prior Information , 1998 .

[9]  Yalchin Efendiev,et al.  An Efficient Two-Stage Sampling Method for Uncertainty Quantification in History Matching Geological Models , 2008 .

[10]  Alexander Y. Sun,et al.  Sequential updating of multimodal hydrogeologic parameter fields using localization and clustering techniques , 2009 .

[11]  L. Hu Gradual Deformation and Iterative Calibration of Gaussian-Related Stochastic Models , 2000 .

[12]  Albert C. Reynolds,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainty for the PUNQ-S3 Problem in a Bayesian Setting With RML and EnKF , 2005 .

[13]  P. A. Swaby,et al.  Combining Geostatistical Modelling With Gradient Information for History Matching: The Pilot Point Method , 1997 .

[14]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  Conditioning Permeability Fields to Pressure Data , 1996 .

[15]  L. M. Berliner,et al.  A Bayesian tutorial for data assimilation , 2007 .

[16]  P. Kitanidis Quasi‐Linear Geostatistical Theory for Inversing , 1995 .

[17]  D. Oliver,et al.  Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for conditioning a permeability field to pressure data , 1997 .

[18]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  Joint Updating of Petrophysical Properties and Discrete Facies Variables From Assimilating Production Data Using the EnKF , 2011 .

[19]  Albert C. Reynolds,et al.  Iterative Ensemble Kalman Filters for Data Assimilation , 2009 .

[20]  J. W. Barker,et al.  Quantifying Uncertainty in Production Forecasts: Another Look at the PUNQ-S3 Problem , 2001 .

[21]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  Evaluation of Monte Carlo Methods for Assessing Uncertainty , 2003 .

[22]  Albert C. Reynolds,et al.  Assessing the Uncertainty in Reservoir Description and Performance Predictions With the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2005 .