Adaptation to number operates on perceived rather than physical numerosity

Humans share with many animals a number sense, the ability to estimate rapidly the approximate number of items in a scene. Recent work has shown that like many other perceptual attributes, numerosity is susceptible to adaptation. It is not clear, however, whether adaptation works directly on mechanisms selective to numerosity, or via related mechanisms, such as those tuned to texture density. To disentangle this issue we measured adaptation of numerosity of 10 pairs of connected dots, as connecting dots makes them appear to be less numerous than unconnected dots. Adaptation to a 20-dot pattern (same number of dots as the test) caused robust reduction in apparent numerosity of the connected-dot pattern, but not of the unconnected dot-pattern. This suggests that adaptation to numerosity, at least for relatively sparse dot-pattern, occurs at neural levels encoding perceived numerosity, rather than at lower levels responding to the number of elements in the scene.

[1]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Size Adaptation: A New Aftereffect , 1969, Science.

[2]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[4]  Susan Carey,et al.  Spontaneous number representation in semi–free–ranging rhesus monkeys , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  David C. Burr,et al.  Separate Mechanisms for Perception of Numerosity and Density , 2014, Psychological science.

[7]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[8]  Cognitive and Communicative Abilities of Grey Parrots , 2002 .

[9]  Irene Togoli,et al.  Motion-induced compression of perceived numerosity , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[10]  D. Burr,et al.  A Visual Sense of Number , 2007, Current Biology.

[11]  Jason Bell,et al.  Symmetry is less than meets the eye , 2015, Current Biology.

[12]  Tiangang Zhou,et al.  Topology-defined units in numerosity perception , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Comment on "Log or Linear? Distinct Intuitions of the Number Scale in Western and Amazonian Indigene Cultures" , 2009, Science.

[14]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[15]  Guido Marco Cicchini,et al.  Mechanisms for perception of numerosity or texture-density are governed by crowding-like effects. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[16]  Guido Marco Cicchini,et al.  Number As a Primary Perceptual Attribute: A Review , 2016, Perception.

[17]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .

[18]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Connectedness affects dot numerosity judgment: Implications for configural processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  Jody C Culham,et al.  Connecting the Dots , 2013, Psychological science.

[20]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. , 1995 .

[21]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  The what and how of counting , 1990, Cognition.

[22]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A common visual metric for approximate number and density , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Daniel Ling,et al.  The Mechanisms of Perception , 1969 .

[24]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Texture density aftereffects in the perception of artificial and natural textures , 1997, Vision Research.

[25]  G. Alvarez,et al.  Number estimation relies on a set of segmented objects , 2009, Cognition.

[26]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Spatially Localized Distortions of Event Time , 2006, Current Biology.

[27]  S. Anstis,et al.  Size adaptation to visual texture and print: evidence for spatial-frequency analysis. , 1974, The American journal of psychology.

[28]  Frank H. Durgin,et al.  Dividing the legs of sheep: Does Burr's Australian stockman strategy work? , 2010 .

[29]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Visual learning in the perception of texture: simple and contingent aftereffects of texture density. , 1996, Spatial vision.

[30]  F. Durgin.  Texture density adaptation and visual number revisited , 2008, Current Biology.

[31]  S. Palmer,et al.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  M Concetta Morrone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[34]  B. P. Klein,et al.  Topographic Representation of Numerosity in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2013, Science.

[35]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  The Mathematical Brain , 1999 .