A New Procedure for Selecting and Ranking Ground-Motion Prediction Equations (GMPEs): The Euclidean Distance-Based Ranking (EDR) Method

Abstract We introduce a procedure for selecting and ranking of ground‐motion prediction equations (GMPEs) that can be useful for regional or site‐specific probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA). The methodology is called Euclidean distance‐based ranking (EDR) as it modifies the Euclidean distance ( DE ) concept for ranking of GMPEs under a given set of observed data. DE is similar to the residual analysis concept; its modified form, as discussed in this paper, can efficiently serve for ranking the candidate GMPEs. The proposed procedure separately considers ground‐motion uncertainty (i.e., aleatory variability addressed by the standard deviation) and the bias between the observed data and median estimations of candidate GMPEs (i.e., model bias). Indices computed from the consideration of aleatory variability and model bias or their combination can rank GMPEs to design GMPE logic trees that can serve for site‐specific or regional PSHA studies. We discussed these features through a case study and ranked a suite of GMPEs under a specific ground‐motion database. The case study indicated that separate consideration of ground‐motion uncertainty (aleatory variability) and model bias or their combination can change the ranking of GMPEs, which also showed that the ground‐motion models having simpler functional forms generally rank at the top of the list. We believe that the proposed method can be a useful tool to improve the decision‐making process while identifying the most proper GMPEs according to the specific objectives of PSHA. Online Material: MATLAB script and sample input file for EDR index calculation.

[1]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[2]  Mustafa Erdik,et al.  Istanbul Earthquake Rapid Response and the Early Warning System , 2003 .

[3]  Philippe Volant,et al.  ATTENUATION RELATION FOR WEST EURASIA DETERMINED WITH RECENT NEAR-FAULT RECORDS FROM CALIFORNIA, JAPAN AND TURKEY , 2003 .

[4]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  AN EXPLORATION OF THE NATURE OF THE SCATTER IN GROUND-MOTION PREDICTION EQUATIONS AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR SEISMIC HAZARD ASSESSMENT , 2003 .

[5]  Polat Gülkan,et al.  Site-Dependent Spectra Derived from Ground Motion Records in Turkey , 2004 .

[6]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences , 2004, Technometrics.

[7]  Lance Manuel,et al.  An empirical attenuation relationship for Northwestern Turkey ground motion using a random effects approach , 2004 .

[8]  F. Scherbaum,et al.  On the Use of Response Spectral-Reference Data for the Selection and Ranking of Ground-Motion Models for Seismic-Hazard Analysis in Regions of Moderate Seismicity: The Case of Rock Motion , 2004 .

[9]  J. Douglas,et al.  Equations for the Estimation of Strong Ground Motions from Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Using Data from Europe and the Middle East: Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration and Spectral Acceleration , 2005 .

[10]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Orientation-Independent Measures of Ground Motion , 2006 .

[11]  J. Bommer,et al.  Relationships between Median Values and between Aleatory Variabilities for Different Definitions of the Horizontal Component of Motion , 2006 .

[12]  J. Bommer,et al.  Influence of long‐period filter cut‐off on elastic spectral displacements , 2006 .

[13]  Lucia Luzi,et al.  Ground-Motion Predictions from Empirical Attenuation Relationships versus Recorded Data: The Case of the 1997–1998 Umbria-Marche, Central Italy, Strong-Motion Data Set , 2006 .

[14]  H. Thio,et al.  Attenuation Relations of Strong Ground Motion in Japan Using Site Classification Based on Predominant Period , 2006 .

[15]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Criteria for Selecting and Adjusting Ground-Motion Models for Specific Target Regions: Application to Central Europe and Rock Sites , 2006 .

[16]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Relocation and assessment of seismicity in the Iran region , 2006 .

[17]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  Update of likelihood-based ground-motion model selection for seismic hazard analysis in western central Europe , 2007 .

[18]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA Ground-Motion Relations , 2008 .

[19]  BrianS-J. Chiou,et al.  An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra , 2008 .

[20]  E. Faccioli,et al.  Broadband (0.05 to 20 s) prediction of displacement response spectra based on worldwide digital records , 2008 .

[21]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at Spectral Periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s , 2008 .

[22]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  An evaluation of the applicability of the NGA models to ground-motion prediction in the Euro-Mediterranean region , 2008 .

[23]  K. Campbell,et al.  NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10 s , 2008 .

[24]  Maurice S. Power,et al.  An Overview of the NGA Project , 2008 .

[25]  J. Shoja-Taheri,et al.  A Test of the Applicability of NGA Models to the Strong Ground-Motion Data in the Iranian Plateau , 2009 .

[26]  G. Lanzo,et al.  A Comparison of NGA Ground-Motion Prediction Equations to Italian Data , 2009 .

[27]  Mehdi Zare,et al.  An empirical spectral ground-motion model for Iran , 2009 .

[28]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  Information-Theoretic Selection of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Seismic Hazard Analysis: An Applicability Study Using Californian Data , 2009 .

[29]  F. Scherbaum,et al.  Model Selection in Seismic Hazard Analysis: An Information-Theoretic Perspective , 2009 .

[30]  J. Kaklamanos,et al.  Implementation of the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) ground-motion prediction equations in Fortran and R , 2010 .

[31]  B. Sadık Bakır,et al.  Site classification of Turkish national strong-motion stations , 2010 .

[32]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  On the Selection of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for Seismic Hazard Analysis , 2010 .

[33]  S. Akkar,et al.  A Local Ground-Motion Predictive Model for Turkey, and Its Comparison with Other Regional and Global Ground-Motion Models , 2010 .

[34]  Polat Gülkan,et al.  The recently compiled Turkish strong motion database: preliminary investigation for seismological parameters , 2010 .

[35]  Lucia Luzi,et al.  Horizontal and vertical ground motion prediction equations derived from the Italian Accelerometric Archive (ITACA) , 2010 .

[36]  E. Faccioli,et al.  Mapping Seismic Hazard for the Needs of Displacement-Based Design: The Case of Italy , 2010 .

[37]  J. Bommer,et al.  Empirical Equations for the Prediction of PGA, PGV, and Spectral Accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean Region, and the Middle East , 2010 .

[38]  J. Kaklamanos,et al.  Model Validations and Comparisons of the Next Generation Attenuation of Ground Motions (NGA-West) Project , 2011 .

[39]  David M. Boore,et al.  Estimating Unknown Input Parameters when Implementing the NGA Ground-Motion Prediction Equations in Engineering Practice , 2011 .

[40]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  The high‐frequency limit of usable response spectral ordinates from filtered analogue and digital strong‐motion accelerograms , 2011 .

[41]  F. Scherbaum,et al.  Testing the Global Applicability of Ground‐Motion Prediction Equations for Active Shallow Crustal Regions , 2012 .

[42]  F. Cotton,et al.  On the Testing of Ground‐Motion Prediction Equations against Small‐Magnitude Data , 2012, 1212.2981.

[43]  Regional differences in subduction ground motions , 2012, 1212.3287.

[44]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  An Evaluation of the Applicability of Current Ground‐Motion Models to the South and Central American Subduction Zones , 2012 .

[45]  Alireza Azarbakht,et al.  Selection of Ground Motion Prediction Models for Seismic Hazard Analysis in the Zagros Region, Iran , 2012 .

[46]  J. Douglas,et al.  Toward a ground-motion logic tree for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Europe , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[47]  A. V. Shoushtari,et al.  On the Selection of Ground-Motion Prediction Equations Compatible with Peninsular Malaysia Region for Sumatran Subduction In-Slab Earthquakes , 2014 .