Statistical Evidence of Discrimination

Abstract Generally speaking, laws against discrimination prohibit treating similarly situated persons differently. Legal analysis or social policy supplies the criteria for ascertaining which persons are similarly situated. Statistical evidence has been used in cases, among others, alleging discrimination in criminal prosecutions, educational opportunities, jury selection, and employment practices. The United States Supreme Court has been ambivalent about the need for significance testing in such cases, and it has yet to consider carefully the use of formal inferential methods. Various techniques for conveying information to a court about the inferential value of sample statistics are illustrated in the context of two jury-selection discrimination cases. The role of statistical evidence in certain employment discrimination cases is also considered. It is suggested that the classical method of hypothesis testing used by the Supreme Court is not appropriate to testing whether a given defendant discriminated...

[1]  Michael O. Finkelstein.  The Judicial Reception of Multiple Regression Studies in Race and Sex Discrimination Cases , 1980 .

[2]  Bruce E. Rosenblum.  Discriminatory Purpose and Disproportionate Impact: An Assessment after "Feeney" , 1979 .

[3]  J. Friedman.  The Burger Court and the prima facie case in employment discrimination litigation: a critique. , 1979, Cornell law review.

[4]  M. Perry.  Modern Equal Protection: A Conceptualization and Appraisal , 1979 .

[5]  B. Lerner.  Employment Discrimination: Adverse Impact, Validity, and Equality , 1979, The Supreme Court Review.

[6]  A. M. Mathai,et al.  Probability and statistics , 2014, Actuarial Mathematics for Life Contingent Risks.

[7]  Raoul Berger,et al.  Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment , 1978 .

[8]  Elaine W. Shoben.  Differential Pass-Fail Rates in Employment Testing: Statistical Proof Under Title VII , 1978 .

[9]  David Lindley,et al.  A problem in forensic science , 1977 .

[10]  John P. Lehoczky,et al.  Jury Representativeness: A Mandate for Multiple Source Lists , 1977 .

[11]  P. Brest,et al.  The Supreme Court, 1975 Term , 1976 .

[12]  Richard Lempert,et al.  Uncovering "Nondiscernible" Differences: Empirical Research and the Jury-Size Cases , 1975 .

[13]  J. S. D. Cani.  Statistical Evidence in Jury Discrimination Cases , 1974 .

[14]  W. Fairley.  Probabilistic Analysis of Identification Evidence , 1973, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[15]  John Kaplan,et al.  Decision Theory and the Factfinding Process , 1968 .

[16]  D. A. Sprott,et al.  USE OF THE LIKELIHOOD FUNCTION IN INFERENCE. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  M. Natrella.  The Relation between Confidence Intervals and Tests of Significance: A Teaching Aid , 1960 .

[18]  M. S. Bartlett,et al.  Statistical methods and scientific inference. , 1957 .

[19]  Jesse H. Choper,et al.  Democracy and Distrust , 1983 .

[20]  D. Kaye.  Naked Statistical Evidence , 1980 .

[21]  R. Cohn.  On the Use of Statistics in Employment Discrimination Cases , 1980 .

[22]  David C. Baldus,et al.  Statistical proof of discrimination , 1980 .

[23]  Glenn B. Manishin.  Section 1981: Discriminatory Purpose or Disproportionate Impact? , 1980 .

[24]  Ira Mark Ellman,et al.  Probabilities and Proof: Can HLA and Blood Group Testing Prove Paternity? , 1979 .

[25]  Lea Brilmayer,et al.  Review: Quantitative Methods and Legal Decisions , 1978 .

[26]  Elaine W. Shoben.  Probing the Discriminatory Effects of Employee Selection Procedures with Disparate Impact Analysis Under Title VII , 1977 .

[27]  M. Perry.  Disproportionate Impact Theory of Racial Discrimination , 1977 .

[28]  Barbara Lindemann Schlei,et al.  Employment Discrimination Law , 1976 .

[29]  Owen M. Fiss.  A Theory of Fair Employment Laws , 1971 .

[30]  Michael O. Finkelstein,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Identification Evidence , 1970 .

[31]  H. Zeisel.  Dr. Spock and the Case of the Vanishing Women Jurors , 1969 .