MRF model-based algorithms for image segmentation

The authors empirically compare three algorithms for segmenting simple, noisy images: simulated annealing (SA), iterated conditional modes (ICM), and maximizer of the posterior marginals (MPM). All use Markov random field (MRF) models to include prior contextual information. The comparison is based on artificial binary images which are degraded by Gaussian noise. Robustness is tested with correlated noise and with object and background textured. The ICM algorithm is evaluated when the degradation and model parameters must be estimated, in both supervised and unsupervised modes and on two real images. The results are assessed by visual inspection and through a numerical criterion. It is concluded that contextual information from MRF models improves segmentation when the number of categories and the degradation model are known and that parameters can be effectively estimated. None of the three algorithms is consistently best, but the ICM algorithm is the most robust. The energy of the a posteriori distribution is not always minimized at the best segmentation.<<ETX>>

[1]  J. Besag Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems , 1974 .

[2]  J. Laurie Snell,et al.  Markov Random Fields and Their Applications , 1980 .

[3]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  J. Besag On the Statistical Analysis of Dirty Pictures , 1986 .

[5]  David B. Cooper,et al.  Simple Parallel Hierarchical and Relaxation Algorithms for Segmenting Noncausal Markovian Random Fields , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  Emile H. L. Aarts,et al.  Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications , 1987, Mathematics and Its Applications.

[7]  Haluk Derin,et al.  Modeling and Segmentation of Noisy and Textured Images Using Gibbs Random Fields , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Probabilistic Solution of Ill-Posed Problems in Computational Vision , 1987 .

[9]  Kanti V. Mardia,et al.  A Spatial Thresholding Method for Image Segmentation , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Random field models in image analysis , 1989 .

[11]  Chaur-Chin Chen,et al.  Experiments in filtering discrete Markov random fields to textures , 1989, Proceedings CVPR '89: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Sridhar Lakshmanan,et al.  Simultaneous Parameter Estimation and Segmentation of Gibbs Random Fields Using Simulated Annealing , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Kannan,et al.  ON IMAGE SEGMENTATION TECHNIQUES , 2022 .