Validation of the ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 over the conterminous United States

Abstract. The ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 (GDEM v2) was evaluated over the conterminous United States in a manner similar to the validation conducted for the original GDEM Version 1 (v1) in 2009. The absolute vertical accuracy of GDEM v2 was calculated by comparison with more than 18,000 independent reference geodetic ground control points from the National Geodetic Survey. The root mean square error (RMSE) measured for GDEM v2 is 8.68 meters. This compares with the RMSE of 9.34 meters for GDEM v1. Another important descriptor of vertical accuracy is the mean error, or bias, which indicates if a DEM has an overall vertical offset from true ground level. The GDEM v2 mean error of –0.20 meters is a significant improvement over the GDEM v1 mean error of –3.69 meters. The absolute vertical accuracy assessment results, both mean error and RMSE, were segmented by land cover to examine the effects of cover types on measured errors. The GDEM v2 mean errors by land cover class verify that the presence of aboveground features (tree canopies and built structures) cause a positive elevation bias, as would be expected for an imaging system like ASTER. In open ground classes (little or no vegetation with significant aboveground height), GDEM v2 exhibits a negative bias on the order of 1 meter. GDEM v2 was also evaluated by differencing with the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) dataset. In many forested areas, GDEM v2 has elevations that are higher in the canopy than SRTM.

[1]  David A. Seal,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2007 .

[2]  Thomas A. Hennig,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2001, Digital Earth Moving.

[3]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[4]  W. Henning,et al.  Assessment of the New National Geoid Height Model, GEOID03 , 2004 .

[5]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Validation of SRTM Elevations Over Vegetated and Non-vegetated Terrain Using Medium-Footprint Lidar , 2006 .

[6]  David J. Harding,et al.  SRTM C-band and ICESat Laser Altimetry Elevation Comparisons as a Function of Tree Cover and Relief , 2006 .

[7]  Joachim Höhle,et al.  The International Archives of the Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences , 2008 .

[8]  Aster Gdem Srtm Dted,et al.  ASTER Global DEM Validation Summary Report , 2009 .

[9]  Hiroji Tsu,et al.  The ASTER Global DEM , 2010 .

[10]  D. Roman,et al.  Geodesy, Geoids, and Vertical Datums: A Perspective from the U.S. National Geodetic Survey , 2010 .

[11]  James A. Slater,et al.  Global Assessment of the New ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model , 2011 .

[12]  G. Miliaresis,et al.  An evaluation of the accuracy of the ASTER GDEM and the role of stack number: a case study of Nisiros Island, Greece , 2011 .

[13]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model Version 2 - summary of validation results , 2011 .

[14]  Christopher A. Barnes,et al.  Completion of the 2006 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States. , 2011 .

[15]  Akira Iwasaki,et al.  Characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2 , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[16]  R. Forsberg,et al.  ASTER GDEM validation using LiDAR data over coastal regions of Greenland , 2012 .

[17]  T. Yao,et al.  Evaluation of ASTER GDEM and SRTM and their suitability in hydraulic modelling of a glacial lake outburst flood in southeast Tibet , 2012 .

[18]  Takeo Tadono,et al.  Generation of High Resolution Global DSM from ALOS PRISM , 2014 .

[19]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  Accuracy assessment of the U.S. Geological Survey National Elevation Dataset, and comparison with other large-area elevation datasets: SRTM and ASTER , 2014 .

[20]  Gerhard Krieger,et al.  TanDEM-X: The New Global DEM Takes Shape , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.