Opening the Platform vs. Opening the Complementary Good? The Effect on Product Innovation in Handheld Computing

Some open strategies involve giving up control of a core platform technology. Others involve encouraging outsiders to build complementary innovations on top of the core technology. While these approaches often go hand in hand, I argue they should relate to different objectives, instruments and economic mechanisms. This paper presents evidence from a panel of handheld computing systems (1990-2004) to reveal different relationships between rates of new handheld device introductions and different open strategies. The core of the analysis deals with addressing endogeneity concerns and assuring that econometric comparisons between policy switchers and non-switchers are meaningful. I find that opening the complement (in terms of licensing and IP policies) was related to up to five-times acceleration in the development of new devices. The degree of openness mattered, too; intermediate levels of opening the complement were associated with fastest rates. Opening the platform (in terms of ownership, vertical scope and outside contributions) was associated with a smaller effect, a roughly 20% acceleration in development rates. I interpret these results in the light of emerging theories of openness and innovation.

[1]  Lamar Pierce.  Big Losses in Ecosystem Niches: How Core Firm Decisions Drive Complementary Product Shakeouts , 2009 .

[2]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Faster, smaller, cheaper: an hedonic price analysis of PDAs , 2004 .

[3]  J. West,et al.  The Economic Realities of Open Standards : Black , White and Many Shades of Gray Joel West , 2005 .

[4]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[5]  Ron Adner,et al.  Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations , 2009 .

[6]  Jeffrey T. Macher.  Technological Development and the Boundaries of the Firm: A Knowledge-Based Examination in Semiconductor Manufacturing , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Open Platform Development and the Commercial Internet , 2009 .

[8]  Farasat A. S. Bokhari.  Open Versus Closed Firms and the Dynamics of Industry Evolution , 2007 .

[9]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  A Survey of the Economic Role of Software Platforms in Computer-Based Industries , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Chi-Hyon Lee,et al.  Preferential Linkage and Network Evolution: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Test in the U.S. Video Game Sector , 2004 .

[11]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Does Opening a Platform Stimulate Innovation? The Effect on Systemic and Modular Innovations , 2007 .

[13]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The power of modularity , 2000 .

[14]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Coordination versus Differentiation in a Standards War , 2006 .

[15]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[16]  Robert K. Perrons,et al.  The open kimono: How Intel balances trust and power to maintain platform leadership , 2009 .

[17]  Jay Pil Choi,et al.  The Effects of Integration on R&D Incentives in Systems Markets , 2003 .

[18]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[19]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[20]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  The Vertical Organization of Industry: Systems Competition versus Component Competition , 1998 .

[21]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Dynamic Mixed Duopoly: A Model Motivated by Linux vs. Windows , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[23]  C R Morris,et al.  How architecture wins technology wars. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[24]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs Via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software , 2002 .

[25]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  External Economies and Economic Progress: The Case of the Microcomputer Industry , 1992, Business History Review.

[26]  Andrei Hagiu.  Merchant or Two-Sided Platform? , 2006 .

[27]  C. Wolter,et al.  The Effects of Innovation on Vertical Structure: Perspectives on Transaction Costs and Competences , 2008 .

[28]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Platform Rules: Multi-Sided Platforms as Regulators , 2008 .

[29]  Lior Jacob Strahilevitz,et al.  Information Asymmetries and the Rights to Exclude , 2005 .

[30]  Andrei Hagiu,et al.  Proprietary vs. Open Two-Sided Platforms and Social Efficiency , 2006 .

[31]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[32]  Peng Huang,et al.  Participation in a Platform Ecosystem: Appropriability, Competition and Access to the Installed Base , 2009 .

[33]  Volker Nocke,et al.  Platform Ownership , 2004 .

[34]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  Competition Through Institutional Form: The Case of Cluster Tool Standards , 2004 .

[35]  A. Gawer,et al.  Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel , 2005 .

[36]  Harikesh S. Nair,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Indirect Network Effects in the Market for Personal Digital Assistants , 2004 .

[37]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[38]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Innovation, Rent Extraction, and Integration in Systems Markets , 2000 .

[39]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[40]  Stephan Billinger,et al.  Designing the Boundaries of the Firm: From 'Make, Buy or Ally' to the Dynamic Benefits of Vertical Architecture , 2005 .

[41]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[42]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Open vs. Integrated Innovation: A Model of Discovery and Confinement , 2007 .

[43]  M. Jacobides,et al.  Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures , 2006 .

[44]  Michael Kende,et al.  Profitability under an Open versus a Closed System , 1998 .

[45]  Urs Von Burg,et al.  The Triumph of Ethernet: Technological Communities and the Battle for the LAN Standard , 2002 .

[46]  Jerry Kaplan,et al.  Startup: A Silicon Valley Adventure , 1995 .

[47]  Joseph Farrell.  Standards and Public Policy: Should competition policy favor compatibility? , 2006 .

[48]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization , 1994 .

[49]  P. Rey,et al.  Abuse of Dominance and Licensing of Intellectual Property , 2008 .

[50]  D. Teece.  Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[51]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[52]  R. Heeb,et al.  Innovation and Vertical Integration in Complementary Markets , 2003 .

[53]  Steven J. Davis,et al.  A Competitive Perspective on Internet Explorer , 2000 .

[54]  M. Cusumano,et al.  Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta , 1992, Business History Review.

[55]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  How open should an open system be? essays on mobile computing , 2006 .

[56]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry , 2003 .

[57]  George Westerman,et al.  Disruption, disintegration and the dissipation of differentiability , 2002 .

[58]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[59]  Thomas Marschak.  Strategy and Organization in a System Development Project , 1962 .

[60]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Opening Platforms: How, When and Why? , 2008 .

[61]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Two-Sided Competition of Proprietary vs. Open Source Technology Platforms and the Implications for the Software Industry , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[62]  Shane M. Greenstein,et al.  Invisible hands versus invisible advisors : coordination mechanisms in economic networks / 1993:111 , 1993 .

[63]  Daniel F. Spulber.  Unlocking Technology: Antitrust and Innovation , 2008 .

[64]  Joel West,et al.  How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies , 2003 .

[65]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[66]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[67]  Jean-Charles Rochet,et al.  Two-Sided Markets: An Overview ∗ , 2004 .

[68]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View , 2008 .

[69]  Marc Rysman.  The Economics of Two-Sided Markets , 2009 .

[70]  J. T. Wulu,et al.  Regression analysis of count data , 2002 .

[71]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  Second-sourcing as a Commitment: Monopoly Incentives to Attract Competition - eScholarship , 1986 .

[72]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The product family and the dynamics of core capability , 1992 .

[73]  Andras Niedermayer,et al.  On Platforms, Incomplete Contracts, and Open Source Software , 2013 .

[74]  Luigi Paganetto,et al.  The determinants of suboptimal technological development in the system company–component producers relationship , 2001 .

[75]  Oscar Hauptman,et al.  Platform leadership , 2002 .

[76]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[77]  C. Jason Woodard,et al.  Architectural Control Points , 2008 .

[78]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The Power of Product Platforms , 1997 .

[79]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Network Externalities, Complementarities, and Invitations to Enter , 1996 .

[80]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software , 2005 .

[81]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[82]  Philip J. Weiser,et al.  Modularity, Vertical Integration, and Open Access Policies: Towards a Convergence of Antitrust and Regulation in the Internet Age , 2003 .

[83]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Palm (A): The Debate on Licensing Palm's OS (1997) , 2008 .

[84]  J. Wooldridge.  Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models , 1999 .

[85]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability , 2004 .

[86]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Innovation, openness & platform control , 2010, EC '10.

[87]  Juanjuan Zhang,et al.  Growing Two-Sided Networks by Advertising the User Base: A Field Experiment , 2010, Mark. Sci..