A model of growth and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

We present here a coupled mathematical model of growth and failure of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The failure portion of the model is based on the constitutive theory of softening hyperelasticity where the classical hyperelastic law is enhanced with a new constant indicating the maximum energy that an infinitesimal material volume can accumulate without failure. The new constant controls material failure and it can be interpreted as the average energy of molecular bonds from the microstructural standpoint. The constitutive model is compared to the data from uniaxial tension tests providing an excellent fit to the experiment. The AAA failure model is coupled with a phenomenological theory of soft tissue growth. The unified theory includes both momentum and mass balance laws coupled with the help of the constitutive equations. The microstructural alterations in the production of elastin and remodeling of collagen are reflected in the changing macroscopic parameters characterizing tissue stiffness, strength and density. The coupled theory is used to simulate growth and rupture of an idealized spherical AAA. The results of the simulation showing possible AAA ruptures in growth are reasonable qualitatively while the quantitative calibration of the model will require further clinical observations and in vitro tests. The presented model is the first where growth and rupture are coupled.

[1]  M. R. Roach,et al.  The composition and mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1994, Journal of vascular surgery.

[2]  K. Volokh.  A simple phenomenological theory of tissue growth. , 2004, Mechanics & chemistry of biosystems : MCB.

[3]  R. Budwig,et al.  The influence of shape on the stresses in model abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  R. Green,et al.  An evaluation of new methods of expressing aortic aneurysm size: relationship to rupture. , 1992, Journal of vascular surgery.

[5]  S. Cowin.  Bone mechanics handbook , 2001 .

[6]  J D Humphrey,et al.  A theoretical model of enlarging intracranial fusiform aneurysms. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  T Länne,et al.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: a general defect in the vasculature with focal manifestations in the abdominal aorta? , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  D A Vorp,et al.  Association of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm with local hypoxia and wall weakening. , 2001, Journal of vascular surgery.

[9]  Janet T. Powell,et al.  Mechanical properties of th aneurysmal aorta , 1992 .

[10]  J. Powell,et al.  Mechanical properties of the aneurysmal aorta , 1992, The British journal of surgery.

[11]  P N Watton,et al.  A mathematical model for the growth of the abdominal aortic aneurysm , 2004, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[12]  C. Kleinstreuer,et al.  A New Wall Stress Equation for Aneurysm-Rupture Prediction , 2005, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Jay D. Humphrey,et al.  Structure, Mechanical Properties, and Mechanics of Intracranial Saccular Aneurysms , 2000 .

[14]  A. Bissery,et al.  Compliance of abdominal aortic aneurysms: evaluation of tissue Doppler imaging. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  M I Patel,et al.  Current views on the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[16]  Konstantin Y. Volokh,et al.  Hyperelasticity with softening for modeling materials failure , 2007 .

[17]  David A. Vorp,et al.  Potential influence of intraluminal thrombus on abdominal aortic aneurysm as assessed by a new non-invasive method. , 1996, Cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  D. Vorp,et al.  The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  D Bergqvist,et al.  Diameter and compliance in the male human abdominal aorta: influence of age and aortic aneurysm. , 1992, European journal of vascular surgery.

[20]  Jonathan P Vande Geest,et al.  Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[21]  M. Webster,et al.  Ex vivo biomechanical behavior of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Assessment using a new mathematical model , 1996, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  N. Hertzer.  Outcome assessment in vascular surgery--results mean everything. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[23]  D A Vorp,et al.  Wall Strength and Stiffness of Aneurysmal and Nonaneurysmal Abdominal Aorta , 1996, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Jonathan P Vande Geest,et al.  Biomechanical determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. , 2005, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[25]  D. Vorp,et al.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  M L Raghavan,et al.  Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  D Bergqvist,et al.  Incidence and Prevalence of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms, Estimated by Necropsy Studies and Population Screening by Ultrasound a , 1996, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  K. Volokh,et al.  Stresses in growing soft tissues. , 2006, Acta biomaterialia.

[29]  K Y Volokh,et al.  Prediction of arterial failure based on a microstructural bi-layer fiber-matrix model with softening. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  The Mathematica Book , 1996 .