Adjoint error estimation and grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to quasi-one-dimensional flow

Abstract An error estimation and grid adaptive strategy is presented for estimating and reducing simulation errors in functional outputs of partial differential equations. The procedure is based on an adjoint formulation in which the estimated error in the functional can be directly related to the local residual errors of both the primal and adjoint solutions. This relationship allows local error contributions to be used as indicators in a grid-adaptive strategy designed to produce specially tuned grids for accurately estimating the chosen functional. In this paper, attention is limited to one-dimensional problems, although the procedure is readily extendable to multiple dimensions. The error estimation procedure is applied to a standard, second-order, finite volume discretization of the quasi-one-dimensional Euler equations. Both isentropic and shocked flows are considered. The chosen functional of interest is the integrated pressure along a variable-area duct. The error estimation procedure, applied on uniform grids, provides superconvergent values of the corrected functional. Results demonstrate that additional improvements in the accuracy of the functional can be achieved by applying the proposed adaptive strategy to an initially uniform grid. The proposed adaptive strategy is also compared with a standard adaptive scheme based on the interpolation error in the computed pressure. The proposed scheme consistently yields more accurate functional predictions than does the standard scheme.

[1]  L. Richardson The Approximate Arithmetical Solution by Finite Differences of Physical Problems Involving Differential Equations, with an Application to the Stresses in a Masonry Dam , 1911 .

[2]  L. Richardson,et al.  The Deferred Approach to the Limit. Part I. Single Lattice. Part II. Interpenetrating Lattices , 1927 .

[3]  A. Shapiro The dynamics and thermodynamics of compressible fluid flow. , 1953 .

[4]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[5]  G. D. van Albada,et al.  A comparative study of computational methods in cosmic gas dynamics , 1982 .

[6]  J. Whiteman The Mathematics of Finite Elements and Applications. , 1983 .

[7]  Ivo Babuška,et al.  The post-processing approach in the finite element method—part 1: Calculation of displacements, stresses and other higher derivatives of the displacements , 1984 .

[8]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineerng analysis , 1987 .

[9]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Adaptive remeshing for compressible flow computations , 1987 .

[10]  C. Hirsch,et al.  Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. By C. HIRSCH. Wiley. Vol. 1, Fundamentals of Numerical Discretization. 1988. 515 pp. £60. Vol. 2, Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows. 1990, 691 pp. £65. , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Error estimation and adaptivity in Navier-Stokes incompressible flows , 1990 .

[12]  C. Hirsch Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, Volume 2: Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows , 1990 .

[13]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Grid convergence for adaptive methods , 1991 .

[14]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The superconvergent patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part 1: The recovery technique , 1992 .

[15]  Dominique Pelletier,et al.  Fast, Adaptive Finite Element Scheme for Viscous Incompressible Flows , 1992 .

[16]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  On Error Control in CFD , 1994 .

[17]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  Analysis of the accuracy of shock-capturing in the steady quasi-1D Euler equations , 1995 .

[18]  M. Giles On adjoint equations for error analysis and optimal grid adaptation in CFD , 1997 .

[19]  Timothy J. Baker,et al.  Mesh adaptation strategies for problems in fluid dynamics , 1997 .

[20]  J. Peraire,et al.  Aerodynamic optimization of unstructured meshes with viscous effects , 1997 .

[21]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Optimum aerodynamic design using the Navier-Stokes equations , 1997 .

[22]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[23]  J. Eric,et al.  Aerodynamic Design Optimization on Unstructured Meshes Using the Navier-Stokes Equations , 1998 .

[24]  Anthony T. Patera,et al.  Asymptotic a Posteriori Finite Element Bounds for the Outputs of Noncoercive Problems: the Helmholtz , 1999 .

[25]  A. Jameson,et al.  Optimum Aerodynamic Design Using the Navier–Stokes Equations , 1997 .

[26]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  Adaptive finite element methods for low-mach-number flows with chemical reactions , 1999 .

[27]  J. Oden,et al.  A Posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis , 2000 .

[28]  David Anthony Venditti,et al.  Grid adaptation for functional outputs of compressible flow simulations , 2000 .

[29]  Michael B. Giles,et al.  Adjoint Recovery of Superconvergent Functionals from PDE Approximations , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[30]  David L. Darmofal,et al.  AIAA 2001-2659 A Grid Adaptive Methodology for Functional Outputs of Compressible Flow Simulations , 2001 .

[31]  Anthony T. Patera,et al.  A posteriori finite-element output bounds for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations: application to a natural convection problem , 2001 .