Affective Interactions

This paper considers how research into empathy in teaching and learning can inform the research into intelligent systems and intelligent agents embedded in educational applications. It also relates this research to some analysis of classroom practice completed as part of the EU funded NIMIS project. The project is developing three applications, one of which aims to support writing development with young children aged 5-6 years based on a cartoon format. The NIMIS classroom as a whole is designed to enhance and augment existing classroom practices and to foster collaboration by non-intrusive hardware and intuitive hardware and software interfaces. To this end it seeks to enhance both human and electronic communication in the classroom. Empathy is central to ensuring the quality of human communication and personal development. This paper suggests that intelligent systems that can consider more carefully the processes and feelings involved in human interactions in teaching and learning, may promote higher quality support for students in classrooms.

[1]  Robert Trappl,et al.  Creating Personalities for Synthetic Actors , 1997, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[2]  Joseph Weizenbaum,et al.  and Machine , 1977 .

[3]  Joseph Bates,et al.  The role of emotion in believable agents , 1994, CACM.

[4]  Aaron Sloman,et al.  Why Robots Will Have Emotions , 1981, IJCAI.

[5]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[6]  Cristiano Castelfranchi To believe and to feel: The case of "needs" , 1998 .

[7]  E. Vesterinen,et al.  Affective Computing , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[8]  Aaron Bryan Loyall,et al.  Believable agents: building interactive personalities , 1997 .

[9]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Integrating pedagogical capabilities in a virtual environment agent , 1997, AGENTS '97.

[10]  W. S. Reilly,et al.  Believable Social and Emotional Agents. , 1996 .

[11]  R. Lazarus Emotion and Adaptation , 1991 .

[12]  Michael L. Mauldin,et al.  CHATTERBOTS, TINYMUDS, and the Turing Test: Entering the Loebner Prize Competition , 1994, AAAI.

[13]  James C. Lester,et al.  The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents , 1997, CHI.

[14]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[15]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  How might people interact with agents , 1994, CACM.

[16]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  Multiagent Collaboration in Directed Improvisation , 1997, ICMAS.

[17]  P. Mcghee,et al.  The psychology of humor : theoretical perspectives and empirical issues , 1972 .

[18]  Andrew Stern,et al.  Socially intelligent virtual petz , 1997 .

[19]  A. B. Loyall,et al.  Integrating Reactivity, Goals, and Emotion in a Broad Agent , 1992 .

[20]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[21]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[22]  S. Penny Embodied Cultural Agents : at the intersection of Robotics , Cognitive Science and Interactive Art , 2002 .

[23]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology , 1994, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  James C. Lester,et al.  Increasing believability in animated pedagogical agents , 1997, AGENTS '97.

[25]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Goal-Based Personalities and Social Behaviors in Believable Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[26]  Thomas Rist,et al.  Integrating reactive and scripted behaviors in a life-like presentation agent , 1998, AGENTS '98.

[27]  Elisabeth André,et al.  The Persona Effect: How Substantial Is It? , 1998, BCS HCI.

[28]  Paola Rizzo Personalities in Believable Agents: a goal-based model and its realization with an integrated planning architecture , 1999, AI Commun..

[29]  Athomas Goldberg IMPROV: A System for Real-Time Animation of Behavior-Based Interactive Synthetic Actors , 1997, Creating Personalities for Synthetic Actors.

[30]  Brenda K. Laurel,et al.  Interface as Mimesis , 1986 .

[31]  Susanne van Mulken,et al.  The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  Jaime G. Carbonell,et al.  Towards a Process Model of Human Personality Traits , 1980, Artif. Intell..

[33]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[34]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct manipulation vs. interface agents , 1997, INTR.

[35]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Credibility and computing technology , 1999, CACM.

[36]  Thomas Rist,et al.  Integrating Models of Personality and Emotions into Lifelike Characters , 1999, IWAI.

[37]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[38]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Pathematic agents: rapid development of believable emotional agents in intelligent virtual environments , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[39]  George K. Papakonstantinou,et al.  A Framework for Plot Control in Interactive Story Systems , 1996, AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1.

[40]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Designing Comprehensible Agents , 1999, IJCAI.

[41]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[42]  C. Elliott The affective reasoner: a process model of emotions in a multi-agent system , 1992 .

[43]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoeia: computers as social actors , 1993, INTERCHI Adjunct Proceedings.

[44]  F. Thomas,et al.  Disney Animation: The Illusion of Life , 1981 .