Assessing impacts of intensified biomass removal and biodiversity protection on European forests.

Verkerk P.J. (2015). Assessing impacts of intensified biomass removal and biodiversity protection on European forests. Dissertationes Forestales 197. 50 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.14214/df.197 Forests provide many benefits to society and it is important to understand if, and how, policies affect the provisioning of ecosystem services. The objective of this dissertation was to analyze and evaluate impacts of intensified biomass production and biodiversity protection on ecosystem services provided by European forests. Article I assessed to what extent forests are protected and how felling restrictions affect the potential annual wood supply. Felling restrictions applied to currently protected forest areas reduce the long-term potential supply of wood by 35 million m 3 yr -1 . Despite these restrictions, wood harvesting is allowed to a fair extent in these protected forests. Articles II-V assessed the future woody biomass potentials and impacts of different scenarios on forests using the European Forest Information SCENario model (EFISCEN). In article II, the realisable woody biomass potential was estimated at 741 million m 3 yr -1 in 2010, including woody biomass from stems, residues, stumps and other biomass, ranging from 620 to 891 million m 3 yr -1 in 2030. Mobilising these potentials would imply drastic changes in the management of European forests. According to articles III-V intensified biomass removals could involve trade-offs with other forest ecosystem services. Carbon storage in forest biomass, as well as the amount of deadwood, was projected to decline due to measures to intensify the use of forests. An economic valuation showed that intensifying biomass removals could lead to a net economic benefit measured by the aggregated value of five ecosystem services, as compared to projections without measures to intensify use of forest biomass. Larger social benefits could potentially be obtained if biodiversity protection is enhanced in European forests. The results presented in this dissertation illustrate that careful planning is required to accommodate the need for protection of biodiversity, the expected growing demand for wood, as well as the provisioning of forest ecosystem services.

[1]  T. Pukkala Does biofuel harvesting and continuous cover management increase carbon sequestration , 2014 .

[2]  Werner Rammer,et al.  Increasing forest disturbances in Europe and their impact on carbon storage. , 2014, Nature climate change.

[3]  L. Joppa,et al.  High and Far: Biases in the Location of Protected Areas , 2009, PloS one.

[4]  Per Gundersen,et al.  The impact of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration by European forests , 2009 .

[5]  B. Solberg,et al.  Increasing Forest Conservation in Norway: Consequences for Timber and Forest Products Markets , 2005 .

[6]  Werner Rammer,et al.  Potential stocks and increments of woody biomass in the European Union under different management and climate scenarios , 2013, Carbon Balance and Management.

[7]  J. Liski,et al.  Carbon and decomposition model Yasso for forest soils , 2005 .

[8]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Importing Timber, Exporting Ecological Impact , 2005, Science.

[9]  H. Haberl,et al.  Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Lauri Hetemäki,et al.  Studying the future of the forest sector: Review and implications for long-term outlook studies , 2013 .

[11]  Maximilian Posch,et al.  Modelling the impact of nitrogen deposition, climate change and nutrient limitations on tree carbon sequestration in Europe for the period 1900-2050. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[12]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Nutrient availability as the key regulator of global forest carbon balance , 2014 .

[13]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[14]  H. D. Klerk,et al.  Fynbos (fine bush) vegetation and the supply of water: a comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis , 1997 .

[15]  M. Koehl,et al.  State of Europe's Forests 2007: The MCPFE Report on Sustainable Forest Management in Europe , 2007 .

[16]  Marco Bindi,et al.  Assessing risk and adaptation options to fires and windstorms in European forestry , 2010 .

[17]  T. Virtanen,et al.  Loss of habitats, naturalness and species diversity in Eurasian forest landscapes , 2010 .

[18]  P. Lasch-Born,et al.  Projections of regional changes in forest net primary productivity for different tree species in Europe driven by climate change and carbon dioxide , 2014, Annals of Forest Science.

[19]  T Wiesenthal,et al.  How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment , 2006 .

[20]  K. Helming,et al.  Ex-ante Impact Assessments (IA) in the European Commission — an overview , 2008 .

[21]  M. Harmon,et al.  Dynamics of the dead wood carbon pool in northwestern Russian boreal forests , 1995 .

[22]  J. Parviainen,et al.  COST Action E27. Protected Forest Areas in Europe - analysis and harmonisation (PROFOR): results, conclusions and recommendations. , 2007 .

[23]  J. Rolstad,et al.  How long do Norway spruce snags stand? Evaluating four estimation methods , 2004 .

[24]  Gert-Jan Nabuurs,et al.  Validation of the European Forest Information Scenario Model (EFISCEN) and a projection of Finnish forests , 2000 .

[25]  G. Weiss,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Sustainability Impact Assessment of Forest Management Alternatives in Europe Public Preferences Across Europe for Different Forest Stand Types as Sites for Recreation , 2012 .

[26]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  The European carbon balance. Part 3: forests , 2010 .

[27]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change , 2005 .

[28]  R. Houghton,et al.  Bias in the attribution of forest carbon sinks , 2013 .

[29]  M. Lindén,et al.  Econometric analysis of forest conservation: the Finnish experience , 2002, Environment and Development Economics.

[30]  R. Sathre,et al.  Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution , 2010 .

[31]  Juha Siitonen,et al.  Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example , 2001 .

[32]  M. Jonsell The Effects Of Forest Biomass Harvesting On Biodiversity , 2008 .

[33]  R. Hänninen,et al.  Economic impacts on the forest sector of increasing forest biodiversity conservation in Finland , 2007 .

[34]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  FOREST CARBON SINKS IN THE NORTHERN HEMISPHERE , 2002 .

[35]  Douglas L. Godbold,et al.  Stump Harvesting for Bioenergy - A Review of the Environmental Impacts , 2010 .

[36]  K. Puettmann,et al.  Forest management, restoration, and designer ecosystems: Integrating strategies for a crowded planet , 2008 .

[37]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[38]  Sylvain Delzon,et al.  Climate change and European forests: what do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management? , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[39]  T. Strong,et al.  Carbon storage in managed forests of the northern Great Lake States , 1996 .

[40]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria , 2007 .

[41]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[42]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines , 2010, Science.

[43]  Sigrid Stagl,et al.  Exploring alternatives for environmental valuation , 2005 .

[44]  M. Herold,et al.  A high-resolution and harmonized model approach for reconstructing and analysing historic land changes in Europe , 2012 .

[45]  M. Lindner,et al.  A concept for assessing sustainability impacts of forestry-wood chains , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[46]  J. Kaplan,et al.  The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe , 2009 .

[47]  A. Bončina,et al.  Conceptual Approaches to Integrate Nature Conservation into Forest Management: A Central European Perspective , 2011 .

[48]  Henrik Andrén,et al.  Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species , 2013, Nature Communications.

[49]  Sedat Keleş,et al.  Quantifying the Effects of Forest Management Strategies on the Production of Forest Values: Timber, Carbon, Oxygen, Water, and Soil , 2010 .

[50]  D. C. van der Werf,et al.  Model documentation for the European Forest Information Scenario model (EFISCEN 3.1.3) , 2007 .

[51]  Victor M. Yakovenko,et al.  Temporal Evolution , 2005, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[52]  W. M. Aust,et al.  Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE)-Predicted Soil Loss for Harvesting Regimes in Appalachian Hardwoods , 2002 .

[53]  W. Reid,et al.  Keeping Options Alive: The Scientific Basis for Conserving Biodiversity , 1989 .

[54]  M. Schelhaas,et al.  Evaluation of a large-scale forest scenario model in heterogeneous forests: a case study for Switzerland , 2006 .

[55]  Jari Liski,et al.  Scenario analysis of the impacts of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget , 2003 .

[56]  Michael Williams,et al.  Dark ages and dark areas: global deforestation in the deep past , 2000 .

[57]  Mats Jonsell,et al.  Effects of fuelwood harvesting on biodiversity - a review focused on the situation in Europe. , 2012 .

[58]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Global cost estimates of reducing carbon emissions through avoided deforestation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  J. Parviainen,et al.  Protected forests in Europe approaches-harmonising the definitions for international comparison and forest policy making. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[60]  Niklaus E. Zimmermann,et al.  Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land , 2013 .

[61]  Danae Diakoulaki,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis and cost–benefit analysis of alternative scenarios for the power generation sector in Greece , 2007 .

[62]  B. Solberg,et al.  Economic impacts of increased forest conservation in Europe: a forest sector model analysis , 2006 .

[63]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Carbon management and biodiversity. , 2003, Journal of Environmental Management.

[64]  G. Nabuurs,et al.  Sustainable management regimes for Europe's forests — a projection with EFISCEN until 2050 , 2001 .

[65]  C. M. Molina,et al.  Forest policy and economics in Mediterranean Spanish forests. , 2003 .

[66]  P. Ciais,et al.  Reconstruction and attribution of the carbon sink of European forests between 1950 and 2000 , 2011 .

[67]  Y. Paillet,et al.  Biodiversity Differences between Managed and Unmanaged Forests: Meta‐Analysis of Species Richness in Europe , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[68]  R. Siegwolf,et al.  Carbon Flux and Growth in Mature Deciduous Forest Trees Exposed to Elevated CO2 , 2005, Science.

[69]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection , 2014, Science.

[70]  G. Mace,et al.  Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom , 2013, Science.

[71]  J. Farrington,et al.  Ex ante impact assessment of policies affecting land use, Part B: application of the analytical framework , 2011 .

[72]  H. Mooney,et al.  Confronting the human dilemma , 2005, Nature.

[73]  G. Fiorese,et al.  An Integrated Modelling Framework for the Forest-based Bioeconomy , 2014, bioRxiv.

[74]  A. Barbati,et al.  Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems , 2010 .

[75]  M. Schelhaas,et al.  Adding natural disturbances to a large-scale forest scenario model and a case study for Switzerland , 2002 .

[76]  K. Blennow,et al.  Forest owner motivations and attitudes towards supplying biomass for energy in Europe , 2014 .

[77]  B. Reineking,et al.  Models for forest ecosystem management: a European perspective. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[78]  R. Bradshaw Past anthropogenic influence on European forests and some possible genetic consequences. , 2004 .

[79]  W. de Vries,et al.  Impacts of acid deposition, ozone exposure and weather conditions on forest ecosystems in Europe: an overview , 2014, Plant and Soil.

[80]  Ola Sallnäs,et al.  A matrix growth model of the Swedish forest , 1990 .

[81]  P. Leitão,et al.  Drivers of forest harvesting intensity patterns in Europe , 2014 .

[82]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Forest stand growth dynamics in Central Europe have accelerated since 1870 , 2014, Nature Communications.

[83]  Jari Liski,et al.  Impact of changing wood demand, climate and land use on European forest resources and carbon stocks during the 21st century , 2008 .

[84]  Meredith Welch-Devine,et al.  Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being , 2011 .

[85]  T. Pukkala,et al.  Optimizing the joint production of timber and bilberries , 2010 .

[86]  R. Howarth,et al.  The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations , 2011 .

[87]  Patrick Lamers,et al.  Feedstock specific environmental risk levels related to biomass extraction for energy from boreal and temperate forests , 2013 .

[88]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Optimizing forest management in Finland with carbon subsidies and taxes , 2011 .

[89]  A. Felton,et al.  Linking forest management, policy and biodiversity indicators – A comparison of Lithuania and Southern Sweden , 2013 .

[90]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment , 2015 .

[91]  M. Pekkanen,et al.  Conducting sustainability impact assessments of forestry-wood chains: examples of ToSIA applications , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.