Gene-Gene Interactions Lead to Higher Risk for Development of Type 2 Diabetes in an Ashkenazi Jewish Population

Background Evidence has accumulated that multiple genetic and environmental factors play important roles in determining susceptibility to type 2 diabetes (T2D). Although variants from candidate genes have become prime targets for genetic analysis, few studies have considered their interplay. Our goal was to evaluate interactions among SNPs within genes frequently identified as associated with T2D. Methods/Principal Findings Logistic regression was used to study interactions among 4 SNPs, one each from HNF4A[rs1884613], TCF7L2[rs12255372], WFS1[rs10010131], and KCNJ11[rs5219] in a case-control Ashkenazi sample of 974 diabetic subjects and 896 controls. Nonparametric multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) and generalized MDR (GMDR) were used to confirm findings from the logistic regression analysis. HNF4A and WFS1 SNPs were associated with T2D in logistic regression analyses [P<0.0001, P<0.0002, respectively]. Interaction between these SNPs were also strong using parametric or nonparametric methods: the unadjusted odds of being affected with T2D was 3 times greater in subjects with the HNF4A and WFS1 risk alleles than those without either (95% CI = [1.7–5.3]; P≤0.0001). Although the univariate association between the TCF7L2 SNP and T2D was relatively modest [P = 0.02], when paired with the HNF4A SNP, the OR for subjects with risk alleles in both SNPs was 2.4 [95% CI = 1.7–3.4; P≤0.0001]. The KCNJ11 variant reached significance only when paired with either the HNF4A or WFSI SNPs: unadjusted ORs were 2.0 [95% CI = 1.4–2.8; P≤0.0001] and 2.3 [95% CI = 1.2-4.4; P≤0.0001], respectively. MDR and GMDR results were consistent with the parametric findings. Conclusions These results provide evidence of strong independent associations between T2D and SNPs in HNF4A and WFS1 and their interaction in our Ashkenazi sample. We also observed an interaction in the nonparametric analysis between the HNF4A and KCNJ11 SNPs (P≤0.001), demonstrating that an independently non-significant variant may interact with another variant resulting in an increased disease risk.

[1]  Kristin G Ardlie,et al.  Evaluation of Common Variants in the Six Known Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) Genes for Association With Type 2 Diabetes , 2007, Diabetes.

[2]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Young-onset type 2 diabetes families are the major contributors to genetic loci in the Diabetes UK Warren 2 genome scan and identify putative novel loci on chromosomes 8q21, 21q22, and 22q11. , 2003, Diabetes.

[3]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Common variants in WFS1 confer risk of type 2 diabetes , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[4]  M. Patti,et al.  The emerging genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes. , 2008, Cell metabolism.

[5]  M. Permutt,et al.  An E23K single nucleotide polymorphism in the islet ATP-sensitive potassium channel gene (Kir6.2) contributes as much to the risk of Type II diabetes in Caucasians as the PPARγ Pro12Ala variant , 2002, Diabetologia.

[6]  S. Lewitzky,et al.  A genome scan for type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci in a genetically isolated population. , 2001, Diabetes.

[7]  M J Khoury,et al.  Commentary: facing the challenge of gene-environment interaction: the two-by-four table and beyond. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[8]  M. Schwanstecher,et al.  K(IR)6.2 polymorphism predisposes to type 2 diabetes by inducing overactivity of pancreatic beta-cell ATP-sensitive K(+) channels. , 2002, Diabetes.

[9]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Association studies of genetic variation in the WFS1 gene and type 2 diabetes in U.K. populations. , 2002, Diabetes.

[10]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  Multifactor dimensionality reduction software for detecting gene-gene and gene-environment interactions , 2003, Bioinform..

[11]  M. Mensink.  Lifestyle intervention, glucose tolerance, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. , 2005, Metabolic syndrome and related disorders.

[12]  Andrzej T Galecki,et al.  Three-locus and four-locus QTL interactions influence mouse insulin-like growth factor-I. , 2006, Physiological genomics.

[13]  A. Emery,et al.  Genetic Diversity Among Jews: Diseases and Markers at the DNA Level , 1993 .

[14]  C. Willer,et al.  Replication of the association between variants in WFS1 and risk of type 2 diabetes in European populations , 2008, Diabetologia.

[15]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Large-scale association studies of variants in genes encoding the pancreatic beta-cell KATP channel subunits Kir6.2 (KCNJ11) and SUR1 (ABCC8) confirm that the KCNJ11 E23K variant is associated with type 2 diabetes. , 2003, Diabetes.

[16]  J. H. Moore,et al.  Multifactor-dimensionality reduction shows a two-locus interaction associated with Type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2004, Diabetologia.

[17]  M. Permutt,et al.  Candidate gene studies reveal that the WFS1 gene joins the expanding list of novel type 2 diabetes genes , 2008, Diabetologia.

[18]  Inês Barroso,et al.  Population-Specific Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Conferred by HNF4A P2 Promoter Variants , 2008, Diabetes.

[19]  B. Bonné-Tamir,et al.  Genetic diversity among Jews : diseases and markers at the DNA level , 1992 .

[20]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[21]  D. Hunter.  Gene–environment interactions in human diseases , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[22]  A. Hattersley,et al.  Macrosomia and Hyperinsulinaemic Hypoglycaemia in Patients with Heterozygous Mutations in the HNF4A Gene , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[23]  F B Hu,et al.  Gene–gene interactions between HNF4A and KCNJ11 in predicting Type 2 diabetes in women , 2007, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[24]  Mark Walker,et al.  Combining Information from Common Type 2 Diabetes Risk Polymorphisms Improves Disease Prediction , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[25]  R. Bergman,et al.  Evidence of Interaction Between PPARG2 and HNF4A Contributing to Variation in Insulin Sensitivity in Mexican Americans , 2008, Diabetes.

[26]  Jun Zhu,et al.  A generalized combinatorial approach for detecting gene-by-gene and gene-by-environment interactions with application to nicotine dependence. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  T. Hansen,et al.  Analysis of separate and combined effects of common variation in KCNJ11 and PPARG on risk of type 2 diabetes. , 2005, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[28]  M. Weedon,et al.  The importance of TCF7L2 , 2007, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[29]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Epistasis and the evolutionary dynamics of measured genotypic values during simulated serial bottlenecks , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[30]  A. Bergman,et al.  Lipoprotein Genotype and Conserved Pathway for Exceptional Longevity in Humans , 2006, PLoS biology.

[31]  M. Schwanstecher,et al.  KIR6.2 Polymorphism Predisposes to Type 2 Diabetes by Inducing Overactivity of Pancreatic β-Cell ATP-Sensitive K+ Channels , 2002 .

[32]  C. Wijmenga,et al.  Reconstruction of a functional human gene network, with an application for prioritizing positional candidate genes. , 2006, American journal of human genetics.

[33]  K. Al-Rubeaan,et al.  Genetic Study of Saudi Diabetes (GSSD): significant association of the KCNJ11 E23K polymorphism with type 2 diabetes , 2008, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[34]  Gil Atzmon,et al.  Unique lipoprotein phenotype and genotype associated with exceptional longevity. , 2003, JAMA.

[35]  R. Lipton,et al.  Adiponectin levels and genotype: a potential regulator of life span in humans. , 2008, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[36]  D. Altshuler,et al.  Testing of diabetes-associated WFS1 polymorphisms in the Diabetes Prevention Program , 2008, Diabetologia.

[37]  Inês Barroso,et al.  Population-specific risk of type 2 diabetes ( T 2 D ) conferred by HNF 4 A P 2 promoter variants : a lesson for replication studies , 2008 .

[38]  M. Permutt,et al.  Post Genome-Wide Association Studies of Novel Genes Associated with Type 2 Diabetes Show Gene-Gene Interaction and High Predictive Value , 2008, PloS one.

[39]  Todd Holden,et al.  A flexible computational framework for detecting, characterizing, and interpreting statistical patterns of epistasis in genetic studies of human disease susceptibility. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  J. Florez,et al.  Genetic Architecture of Type 2 Diabetes: Recent Progress and Clinical Implications , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[41]  F. Collins,et al.  Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Scott M. Williams,et al.  A balanced accuracy function for epistasis modeling in imbalanced datasets using multifactor dimensionality reduction , 2007, Genetic epidemiology.

[43]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2010 .

[44]  M. Permutt,et al.  Mice conditionally lacking the Wolfram gene in pancreatic islet beta cells exhibit diabetes as a result of enhanced endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis , 2005, Diabetologia.

[45]  J. Chan,et al.  Construction of a prediction model for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Japanese population based on 11 genes with strong evidence of the association , 2009, Journal of Human Genetics.

[46]  T. Hansen,et al.  Combined analysis of 19 common validated type 2 diabetes susceptibility gene variants shows moderate discriminative value and no evidence of gene–gene interaction , 2009, Diabetologia.

[47]  T. Reich,et al.  A perspective on epistasis: limits of models displaying no main effect. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[48]  M. Permutt,et al.  Assessing allele frequencies of single nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA pools by pyrosequencing technology. , 2002, BioTechniques.

[49]  J. H. Moore,et al.  Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.