Antisocial Agents and Vickrey Auctions

In recent years auctions have become more and more important in the field of multiagent systems as useful mechanisms for resource allocation and task assignment. In many cases the Vickrey (second-price sealed-bid) auction is used as a protocol that prescribes how the individual agents have to interact in order to come to an agreement. We show that the Vickrey auction, despite its theoretical benefits, is inappropriate if "antisocial" agents participate in the auction process. More specifically, an antisocial attitude for economic agents that makes reducing the profit of competitors their main goal besides maximizing their own profit is introduced. Under this novel condition, agents need to deviate from the dominant truth-telling strategy. This paper presents a strategy for bidders in repeated Vickrey auctions who are intending to inflict losses to fellow agents in order to be more successful, not in absolute measures, but relatively to the group of bidders. The strategy is evaluated in a simple task allocation scenario.

[1]  Gerhard Weiss,et al.  Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence , 1999 .

[2]  Scott H. Clearwater,et al.  A Multi-Agent System for Controlling Building Environments , 1995, ICMAS.

[3]  E. Drexler,et al.  Incentive engineering for computational resource management , 1988 .

[4]  Ketil Danielsen,et al.  User Control Modes and IP Allocation , 1995 .

[5]  Eric Bennett Rasmusen Readings in games and information , 2001 .

[6]  Michael H. Rothkopf,et al.  Two Models of Bid-Taker Cheating in Vickrey Auctions , 1995 .

[7]  Wilfried Brauer,et al.  Task Assignment in Multiagent Systems Based on Vickrey-Type Auctioning and Leveled Commitment Contracting , 2000, CIA.

[8]  R. McAfee,et al.  Auctions and Bidding , 1986 .

[9]  M. Rothkopf,et al.  Why Are Vickrey Auctions Rare? , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Foundations of distributed artificial intelligence , 1996, Sixth-generation computer technology series.

[11]  W. K. Vickery,et al.  Counter-Speculation Auctions and Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[12]  Jacques Ferber,et al.  Multi-agent systems - an introduction to distributed artificial intelligence , 1999 .

[13]  Jeffrey K. MacKie-Mason,et al.  Pricing the Internet , 1995 .

[14]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[15]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Spawn: A Distributed Computational Economy , 1992, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[16]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Issues in Automated Negotiation and Electronic Commerce: Extending the Contract Net Framework , 1997, ICMAS.

[17]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  A theory of auctions and competitive bidding , 1982 .

[18]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  The ecology of computation , 1988, Digest of Papers. COMPCON Spring 89. Thirty-Fourth IEEE Computer Society International Conference: Intellectual Leverage.

[19]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Advantages of a Leveled Commitment Contracting Protocol , 1996, AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1.

[20]  T. Sandholm Limitations of the Vickrey Auction in Computational Multiagent Systems , 1996 .

[21]  Felix Brandt,et al.  Cryptographic Protocols for Secure Second-Price Auctions , 2001, CIA.

[22]  E. Stacchetti,et al.  How (not) to sell nuclear weapons , 1996 .