Collective Decision Dynamics in Group Evacuation: Behavioral Experiment and Machine Learning Models

Identifying factors that affect human decision making and quantifying their influence remain essential and challenging tasks for the design and implementation of social and technological communication systems. We report results of a behavioral experiment involving decision making in the face of an impending natural disaster. In a controlled laboratory setting, we characterize individual and group evacuation decision making influenced by several key factors, including the likelihood of the disaster, available shelter capacity, group size, and group decision protocol. Our results show that success in individual decision making is not a strong predictor of group performance. We use an artificial neural network trained on the collective behavior of subjects to predict individual and group outcomes. Overall model accuracy increases with the inclusion of a subject-specific performance parameter based on laboratory trials that captures individual differences. In parallel, we demonstrate that the social media activity of individual subjects, specifically their Facebook use, can be used to generate an alternative individual personality profile that leads to comparable model accuracy. Quantitative characterization and prediction of collective decision making is crucial for the development of effective policies to guide the action of populations in the face of threat or uncertainty.

[1]  T. Graepel,et al.  Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Michael C. Munger,et al.  Choosing in Groups: Analytical Politics Revisited , 2015 .

[3]  J. M. Digman PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[4]  D. Isenberg Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. , 1986 .

[5]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[6]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Flexible human collective wisdom. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Yevgeniy Vorobeychik,et al.  Behavioral dynamics and influence in networked coloring and consensus , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  J. Stephen Judd,et al.  Behavioral experiments on biased voting in networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors , 2002 .

[10]  M. Kearns,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Coloring Problem on Human Subject Networks , 2006, Science.

[11]  Weblog Wikipedia,et al.  In Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia , 2005 .

[12]  Pamela M Allen,et al.  Decision Making for Risk Management: A Comparison of Graphical Methods for Presenting Quantitative Uncertainty , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Neural Mechanisms Underlying Paradoxical Performance for Monetary Incentives Are Driven by Loss Aversion , 2012, Neuron.

[14]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for Adult Populations , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.

[15]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[16]  Michael Kearns,et al.  Experiments in social computation , 2012, KDD.

[17]  Carla S. Prater,et al.  Introduction to Emergency Management , 2006 .

[18]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[19]  Kate Sweeny,et al.  Crisis decision theory: Decisions in the face of negative events. , 2008 .

[20]  Lixin Huang,et al.  Predicting hurricane evacuation decisions: When, how many, and how far , 2011 .

[21]  Yadin Dudai,et al.  Following the Crowd: Brain Substrates of Long-Term Memory Conformity , 2011, Science.

[22]  Reid Hastie,et al.  The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. , 2005, Psychological review.

[23]  Kimberly J. Schlesinger,et al.  Collective Decision Dynamics in Group Evacuation II: Modeling Tradeoffs and Optimal Behavior , 2016, 1611.09767.

[24]  Richard L. Church,et al.  Modeling Small Area Evacuation: Can Existing Transportation Infrastructure Impede Public Safety? , 2002 .

[25]  N. Kerr,et al.  Group performance and decision making. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  Jason C. Crews Determining Optimal Evacuation Decision Policies for Disasters , 2012 .

[27]  J. Stoner Risky and Cautious Shifts in Group Decisions: The Influence of Widely Held Values , 2015 .

[28]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Kimberly J. Schlesinger,et al.  Collective decision dynamics in group evacuation , 2017, SummerSim.

[30]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[31]  C. List,et al.  Group decisions in humans and animals: a survey , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  R. Blendon,et al.  Experiences of hurricane Katrina evacuees in Houston shelters: implications for future planning. , 2006, American journal of public health.

[33]  Joya F. Golden,et al.  Disaster planning and risk communication with vulnerable communities: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[34]  William P. Langford A Space-Time Flow Optimization Model for Neighborhood Evacuation , 2010 .

[35]  T. Drabek Human system responses to disaster , 1986 .

[36]  Kevin P. Murphy,et al.  Machine learning - a probabilistic perspective , 2012, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[37]  Elizabeth Blakesley Lindsay,et al.  The Internet Movie Database (IMDb) , 2013 .

[38]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Collective Decision Dynamics in the Presence of External Drivers , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[39]  M. Kosinski,et al.  Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making , 2007, Biology Letters.

[41]  Nicole Dash,et al.  Evacuation Decision Making and Behavioral Responses: Individual and Household , 2007 .

[42]  Albert B. Kao,et al.  Decision accuracy in complex environments is often maximized by small group sizes , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[44]  S. Redner,et al.  Voter models on heterogeneous networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  I. Couzin,et al.  Emergent Sensing of Complex Environments by Mobile Animal Groups , 2013, Science.

[46]  Eva D. Regnier,et al.  Public Evacuation Decisions and Hurricane Track Uncertainty , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[47]  Emily M. Craparo,et al.  Measuring and Modeling Behavioral Decision Dynamics in Collective Evacuation , 2013, PloS one.

[48]  H. Klein,et al.  Emergent Leadership in the Group Goal-Setting Process , 1995 .

[49]  Michel C. A. Klein,et al.  Modelling collective decision making in groups and crowds: Integrating social contagion and interacting emotions, beliefs and intentions , 2013, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.