Selecting causal brain features with a single conditional independence test per feature

We propose a constraint-based causal feature selection method for identifying causes of a given target variable, selecting from a set of candidate variables, while there can also be hidden variables acting as common causes with the target. We prove that if we observe a cause for each candidate cause, then a single conditional independence test with one conditioning variable is sufficient to decide whether a candidate associated with the target is indeed causing it. We thus improve upon existing methods by significantly simplifying statistical testing and requiring a weaker version of causal faithfulness. Our main assumption is inspired by neuroscience paradigms where the activity of a single neuron is considered to be also caused by its own previous state. We demonstrate successful application of our method to simulated, as well as encephalographic data of twenty-one participants, recorded in Max Planck Institute for intelligent Systems. The detected causes of motor performance are in accordance with the latest consensus about the neurophysiological pathways, and can provide new insights into personalised brain stimulation.

[1]  A. Engel,et al.  Predictive timing functions of cortical beta oscillations are impaired in Parkinson's disease and influenced by L-DOPA and deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus , 2015, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[2]  Peter Buhlmann,et al.  Geometry of the faithfulness assumption in causal inference , 2012, 1207.0547.

[3]  Richard J. Davidson,et al.  Validation of ICA-based myogenic artifact correction for scalp and source-localized EEG , 2010, NeuroImage.

[4]  Tonio Ball,et al.  Causal interpretation rules for encoding and decoding models in neuroimaging , 2015, NeuroImage.

[5]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Measuring Statistical Dependence with Hilbert-Schmidt Norms , 2005, ALT.

[6]  I. Toni,et al.  Distinct roles for alpha- and beta-band oscillations during mental simulation of goal-directed actions. , 2014, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Kernel-based Conditional Independence Test and Application in Causal Discovery , 2011, UAI.

[8]  Patrik O. Hoyer,et al.  Data-driven covariate selection for nonparametric estimation of causal effects , 2013, AISTATS.

[9]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Kernel Measures of Conditional Dependence , 2007, NIPS.

[10]  Laura Frølich,et al.  Removal of muscular artifacts in EEG signals: a comparison of linear decomposition methods , 2018, Brain Informatics.

[11]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Personalized brain-computer interface models for motor rehabilitation , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[12]  Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy,et al.  Functional properties of human primary motor cortex gamma oscillations. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Elements of Causal Inference: Foundations and Learning Algorithms , 2017 .

[14]  A. Seth,et al.  Granger Causality Analysis in Neuroscience and Neuroimaging , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  N. J. Davis,et al.  “Non-invasive” brain stimulation is not non-invasive , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[16]  Masashi Sugiyama,et al.  High-Dimensional Feature Selection by Feature-Wise Kernelized Lasso , 2012, Neural Computation.

[17]  Jose M Carmena,et al.  Beta band oscillations in motor cortex reflect neural population signals that delay movement onset , 2017, eLife.

[18]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Identification of causal relations in neuroimaging data with latent confounders: An instrumental variable approach , 2016, NeuroImage.

[19]  Sander Greenland,et al.  An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists. , 2018, International journal of epidemiology.

[20]  S. Espenhahn The relationship between cortical beta oscillations and motor learning , 2018 .

[21]  John D. Storey,et al.  Harnessing naturally randomized transcription to infer regulatory relationships among genes , 2007, Genome Biology.

[22]  Judea Pearl,et al.  On the Testability of Causal Models With Latent and Instrumental Variables , 1995, UAI.

[23]  Rajen Dinesh Shah,et al.  The hardness of conditional independence testing and the generalised covariance measure , 2018, The Annals of Statistics.

[24]  Catharina Zich,et al.  Motor Cortical Gamma Oscillations: What Have We Learnt and Where Are We Headed? , 2018, Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports.

[25]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Probabilistic Graphical Models - Principles and Techniques , 2009 .

[26]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Beta Power May Mediate the Effect of Gamma-TACS on Motor Performance , 2019, 1905.00319.

[27]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[28]  Jiji Zhang,et al.  Adjacency-Faithfulness and Conservative Causal Inference , 2006, UAI.

[29]  Le Song,et al.  Supervised feature selection via dependence estimation , 2007, ICML '07.

[30]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Causal Consistency of Structural Equation Models , 2017, UAI.

[31]  P. Brown Oscillatory nature of human basal ganglia activity: Relationship to the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease , 2003, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[32]  Andreas K. Engel,et al.  Different coupling modes mediate cortical cross-frequency interactions , 2015, NeuroImage.

[33]  É. Moulines,et al.  Second Order Blind Separation of Temporally Correlated Sources , 1993 .

[34]  P. Brown Abnormal oscillatory synchronisation in the motor system leads to impaired movement , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[35]  Paul L. Furlong,et al.  Oscillatory Beta Activity Mediates Neuroplastic Effects of Motor Cortex Stimulation in Humans , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.